Elsevier

Brain and Cognition

Volume 44, Issue 3, December 2000, Pages 324-341
Brain and Cognition

Regular Article
Extinction-like Effects in Normals: Independence of Localization and Response Selection

https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1999.1195Get rights and content

Abstract

An extinction-like effect in normal subjects was previously elicited when a low-salience target in the left was simultaneously presented with a highly salient distractor in the right visual hemifield, but not vice versa (Pollmann, 1996). We investigated in four experiments whether this extinction-like effect depends on (a) explicit localization and (b) response competition. It was found that the extinction-like effect could be replicated in the absence of both. In contradistinction to our previous results, low-salience distractors had no effect on pop-out target search. This showed that explicit spatial localization demands lead to low-salience distractor interference on pop-out search.

References (37)

  • Beringer, J. 1993, Experimentelles run time system, Version 3.0. Berisoft, Frankfurt am...
  • E. Bisiach et al.

    Hemineglect in humans

  • R. Caminiti et al.

    The sources of visual information to the primate frontal lobe: A novel role for the superior parietal lobule

    Cerebral Cortex

    (1996)
  • Clarke, J. M. 1990, Interhemispheric functions in humans: Relationships between anatomical measures of the corpus...
  • M. Corbetta et al.

    A PET study of visuospatial attention

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1993)
  • J. Duncan et al.

    Visual search and stimulus similarity

    Psychological Review

    (1989)
  • E. Eviatar et al.

    Letter matching within and between the disconnected hemispheres

    Brain and Cognition

    (1994)
  • K.M. Heilman et al.

    Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect)

    Neurology

    (1980)
  • Cited by (0)

    Experiments 1 and 2 were carried out at the Biopsychology Lab of the Free University of Berlin with the support of Rainer Boesel, whom I thank. I am also indebted to Britt Reimann for running Experiments 3 and 4 and Torsten Schubert and Anja Dove for their valuable comments on a previous version of the paper.

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Stefan Pollmann, Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Stephanstr.1a, 22–26, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]. Fax: ++49 314 9940 221.

    View full text