Elsevier

Brain and Cognition

Volume 27, Issue 2, March 1995, Pages 147-179
Brain and Cognition

Regular Article
A Model and Diagnostic Measures for Response-Time Series on Tests of Concentration - Historical Background, Conceptual-Framework, and Some Applications

https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1015Get rights and content

Abstract

Based upon classical hypotheses about accumulating mental fatigue and distraction and its effect on response times, put forward in late 19th and early 20th century papers, a mathematical model is proposed for response times on tests of speed and concentration. The model assumes the random occurrence of very short distractions during information processing. It explains fluctuation and the increasing trend in response times on successive equivalent task units and leads to some simple diagnostic RT measures of speed and concentration as alternatives to the mean RT. A review is given of several experimental applications of the model, with subjects with and without concentration problems, using cancellation and digit addition tasks. The results demonstrate the potential usefulness of the model and the diagnostic measures derived from it. As predicted by the model, prolonged task performance yields an increasing trend in RT mean and variance that can be strongly reduced by giving very short resting periods very frequently, and to a lesser extent also by task alternation, but not by simply motivating the subjects to concentrate. Some practical implications for the administration and scoring of tests of speed and concentration are discussed, as well as limitations of the present results and the complementary relation of our approach to popular ones such as ′stage analysis."

References (0)

Cited by (32)

  • Pace yourself: Neural activation and connectivity changes over time vary by task type and pacing

    2019, Brain and Cognition
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some studies exploring TOT effects in self-paced paradigms have in fact recognized this possibility. For example, an older model for predicting response times on a self-paced task (specifically, a symbol cancellation paradigm) explicitly accounts for switches between “processing time” and “distraction time” to predict the relative negative influences of overload and underload on performance (Van Breukelen et al., 1995). Self-paced tasks are thought to require a continual, effortful process of self-regulation (Steinborn et al., 2010), putatively resulting in a greater accumulation of fatigue than in work-paced paradigms.

  • Electrophysiological and information processing variability predicts memory decrements associated with normal age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease (AD)

    2006, Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, Brinley plots that combine reaction time means across groups without regard to the task, the specific experimental manipulation, or to individual differences, may be less sensitive in the identification of task-, process-, or domain-specific effects of aging (Fisk et al., 1992; Fisk and Fisher, 1994; Mayr and Kliegl, 1993; Sliwinski et al., 1994). Other researchers have highlighted the more complex relationships between response distributions, task parameters and individual differences (Balota and Spieler, 1999, Logan, 1992; Van Breukelen, 1995). Without further application of more advanced experimental and statistical techniques, it would be hasty to conclude that RT SD is less important than RT mean, particularly given that there are theoretical reasons for assuming that RT SD may be more sensitive to the effects of aging than mean RT.

  • Effects of goal-setting on sustained attention and attention lapses

    2023, Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text