Link between Inattentive, Hyperactive/Impulsive, and Disorganized Behaviors and Peer Disliking Analyzed with Quadratic Assignment Procedure | mijn-bsl Skip to main content

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Nieuws
Boeken
Tijdschriften
E-learning
Web-tv
Video
Audio

Tips voor Mijn BSL

UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Journal of Child and Family Studies

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 4/2020

07-12-2019 | Original Paper

Link between Inattentive, Hyperactive/Impulsive, and Disorganized Behaviors and Peer Disliking Analyzed with Quadratic Assignment Procedure

Auteurs: Dominic P. Tannoia, A. Michele Lease

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 4/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Objectives

Research has demonstrated that inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behaviors are associated with peer rejection. Adding to prior research, which has relied on third-party raters or used aggregated peer nominations, we used Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP) correlations and logistic regressions (LRQAP) to examine concordance in peer nomination patterns, controlling for gender homophily between nominator/nominee. We also explored if classroom behavioral norms helped explain in which classrooms LRQAP models were significant.

Methods

Participants (387 fourth and fifth graders from 21 general education classrooms) nominated classmates for three problem behaviors (i.e., inattention, disorganization, and hyperactivity/impulsivity) and as liked-most and liked-least. Teachers also rated each participating student on two scales—distractible and organized; classroom means were used to characterize the behavioral norms in each classroom.

Results

In QAP correlations, nominations for at least one problem behavior were significantly tied with dislike in 81% of classrooms (e.g., child nominated the peer as both inattentive and as liked-least), with inattention the most consistent predictor. Gender homophily had a significant, positive relation to dislike in LRQAP models for 43% of classrooms, but results were largely unchanged. Chi-square analyses of teacher ratings indicated that perceived inattention was more often tied to disliking in classrooms with low and moderate levels of distractibility than high distractibility. Variability of the LRQAP results was otherwise unrelated to classroom norms and grade level.

Conclusions

Children who perceived peers as inattentive or hyperactive/impulsive also reported disliking those same peers in the majority of classrooms suggesting a targeted dislike in response to these behaviors.
vorige artikel Family Functioning in Latinx Families of Children with ADHD: The Role of Parental Gender and Acculturation
volgende artikel Effects of Family Obligation Values and Autonomy Support on Internalizing Symptoms of Vietnamese-American and European-American Adolescents
Literatuur
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: Author.
Bagwell, C. L., Molina, B. S., Pelham, Jr. W. E., & Hoza, B. (2001). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and problems in peer relations: predictions from childhood to adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1285–1292. CrossRef
Barkley, R. A. (2014). Sluggish cognitive tempo (concentration deficit disorder?): current status, future directions, and a plea to change the name. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(1), 117–125. PubMedCrossRef
Becker, S. P., McBurnett, K., Hinshaw, S. P., & Pfiffner, L. J. (2013). Negative social preference in relation to internalizing symptoms among children with ADHD predominantly inattentive type: Girls fare worse than boys. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42(6), 784–795. CrossRef
Boivin, M., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1995). Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: the social misfit revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(2), 269. PubMedCrossRef
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cantrell, V. L., & Prinz, R. J. (1985). Multiple perspectives of rejected, neglected, and accepted children: Relation between sociometric status and behavioral characteristics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(6), 884–889. PubMedCrossRef
Card, N. A., Hodges, E. V., Little, T. D., & Hawley, P. H. (2005). Gender effects in peer nominations for aggression and social status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 146–155. CrossRef
Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children’s social status: a five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(3), 261–282.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557. CrossRef
Coie, J., Terry, R., Lenox, K., Lochman, J., & Hyman, C. (1995). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of stable patterns of adolescent disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 7(04), 697. CrossRef
Deal, J. E., Halverson, C. F., Havill, V., & Martin, R. (2005). Temperament factors as longitudinal predictors of young adult personality. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 51, 315–334. CrossRef
Deal, J. E., Halverson, Jr. C. F., Martin, R. P., Victor, J., & Baker, S. (2007). The inventory of children’s individual differences: development and validation of a short version. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(2), 162–166. PubMedCrossRef
Diamantopoulou, S., Rydell, A. M., Thorell, L. B., & Bohlin, G. (2007). Impact of executive functioning and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on children’s peer relations and school performance. Developmental neuropsychology, 32(1), 521–542. PubMedCrossRef
Erhardt, D., & Hinshaw, S. P. (1994). Initial sociometric impressions of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and comparison boys: predictions from social behaviors and from nonbehavioral variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 833–842. PubMedCrossRef
Evans, S. W., Brady, C. E., Harrison, J. R., Bunford, N., Kern, L., State, T., & Andrews, C. (2013). Measuring ADHD and ODD symptoms and impairment using high school teachers’ ratings. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: The Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 42(2), 197–207. CrossRef
Gomez, R., & Gomez, A. (2015). Agreement of adolescent ratings with mother ratings and teacher ratings of ADHD symptom groups: A correlated trait-correlated method minus one analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 131–135. CrossRef
Hartup, W. W., & Sancilio, M. F. (1986). Children’s friendships. In Social behavior in autism. Boston, MA: Springer.
Halverson, C. F., Havill, V., Deal, J. E., Baker, S., Victor, J., & Pavlopoulos, V. (2003). Personality structure as derived from parental ratings of free descriptions of children: the inventory of child individual differences. Journal of Personality, 71, 995–1026. PubMedCrossRef
Hecht, D. B., Inderbitzen, H. M., & Bukowski, A. L. (1998). The relationship between peer status and depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26(2), 153–160. PubMedCrossRef
Hinshaw, S. P., Zupan, B. A., Simrnel, C., Nigg, J. T., & Melnick, S. (1997). Peer status in boys with and without attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: predictions from overt and covert antisocial behavior, social isolations, and authoritative parenting beliefs. Child Development, 68(5), 880–896. PubMedCrossRef
Hirsch, B. T., Prange, S., Hauver, S. A., & Gehrt, S. D. (2013). Genetic relatedness does not predict raccoon social network structure. Animal Behavior, 85(2), 463–470. CrossRef
Hodgens, J. B., Cole, J., & Boldizar, J. (2000). Peer-based differences among boys with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(3), 443–452. PubMedCrossRef
Hoza, B. (2007). Peer functioning in children with ADHD. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(6), 655–663. PubMedCrossRef
Hymel, S., Rubin, K. H., Rowden, L., & LeMare, L. (1990). Children’s peer relationships: longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Development, 61(6), 2004–2021.
Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10(4), 359–381. CrossRef
Ladd, G. W., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003). The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children’s psychological adjustment problems. Child Development, 74(5), 1344–1367. PubMedCrossRef
Landau, S., & Moore, L. A. (1991). Social skill deficits in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review 20(2), 235–251.
McKee, T. E. (2012). Examining the dimensionality of ADHD symptomatology in young adults using factor analysis and outcome prediction. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(5), 427–437. PubMedCrossRef
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. CrossRef
Meisinger, E., Blake, J., Lease, A., Palardy, G., & Olejnik, S. (2007). Variant and invariant predictors of perceived popularity across majority-Black and majority-White classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 45(1), 21–44. CrossRef
Mrug, S., Brooke, B. S., Hoza, B., Gerdes, A. C., Hinshaw, S. P., Hechtman, L., & Arnold, L. E. (2012). Peer rejection and friendships in children with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: Contributions to long-term outcomes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(6), 1013–1026. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Mrug, S., Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, E. M., & Greiner, A. R. (2007). Behavior and peer status in children with ADHD: continuity and change. Journal of Attention Disorders, 10(4), 359–371. PubMedCrossRef
MTA Cooperative Group (1999). A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 1073–1086. CrossRef
Palili, A., Kolaitis, G., Vassi, I., Veltsista, A., Bakoula, C., & Gika, A. (2011). Inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity–epidemiology and correlations: a nationwide Greek study from birth to 18 years. Journal of Child Neurology, 26(2), 199–204. PubMedCrossRef
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 357–389. PubMedCrossRef
Parker, J. G., Rubin, K. H., Erath, S., Wojslawowicz, J. C., & Buskirk, A. A. (2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: a developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti (Ed), Developmental psychopathology Vol. 3: Risk, disorder, and adaptation. New York: Wiley.
Peery, J. C. (1979). Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: a reconceptualization of sociometric status in preschool children. Child Development, 50(4), 1231–1234. CrossRef
Pelham, W., & Milich, R. (1984). Peer relations in children with hyperactivity/attention deficit disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(9), 560–567. PubMedCrossRef
Pope, A. W., Bierman, K. L., & Mumma, G. H. (1989). Relations between hyperactive and aggressive behavior and peer relations at three elementary grade levels. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17(3), 253–267. PubMedCrossRef
Prinstein, M. J., Rancourt, D., Adelman, C. B., Ahlich, E., Smith, J., & Guerry, J. D. (2018). Peer status and psychopathology. In Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 4(5), 1–48.
Solanto, M. V., Pope-Boyd, S. A., Tryon, W. W., & Stepak, B. (2009). Social functioning in predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 13(1), 27–35. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Spangler, T., & Gazelle, H. (2009). Anxious solitude, unsociability, and peer exclusion in middle childhood: a multitrait–multimethod matrix. Social Development, 18(4), 833–856. PubMedCrossRef
Stenseng, F., Belsky, J., Skalicka, V., & Wichstrøm, L. (2014). Social exclusion predicts impaired self-regulation: a 2-year longitudinal panel study including the transition from preschool to school. Journal of Personality, 83(2), 212–220. PubMedCrossRef
Stenseng, F., Belsky, J., Skalicka, V., & Wichstrøm, L. (2015). Peer rejection and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: reciprocal relations through ages 4, 6, and 8. Child Development, 87(2), 365–373.
Stormshak, E. A., Bierman, K. L., Bruschi, C., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1999). The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Child Development, 70(1), 169–182. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Tseng, W. L., Kawabata, Y., Gau, S. S. F., & Crick, N. R. (2014). Symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and peer functioning: a transactional model of development. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(8), 1353–1365. PubMedCrossRef
Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M., & Parad, H. W. (1986). Social status in small groups: individual-group similarity and the social “misfit.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 523–536. CrossRef
Zoromski, A. K., Owens, J. S., Evans, S. W., & Brady, C. E. (2015). Identifying ADHD symptoms most associated with impairment in early childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence using teacher report. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(7), 1243–1255. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Link between Inattentive, Hyperactive/Impulsive, and Disorganized Behaviors and Peer Disliking Analyzed with Quadratic Assignment Procedure
Auteurs
Dominic P. Tannoia
A. Michele Lease
Publicatiedatum
07-12-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01679-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Journal of Child and Family Studies 4/2020 Naar de uitgave

Original Paper

Applying a Momentary Parenting Goal-Regulation Model to Discipline Episodes with Toddlers

Original Paper

Cross-Cultural Validity of the Emotion Matching Task

Original Paper

Organized Chaos: Daily Routines Link Household Chaos and Child Behavior Problems

Original Paper

Short Form Version of the Father and Mother Attachment Questionnaire (FMAQ)

Original Paper

A Pilot Study of One-Session Treatment for Specific Phobias in Children with ASD Traits

Original Paper

Adolescents’ Attachment: Content and Discriminant Validity of the Friends and Family Interview