Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

29-09-2015 | Original Article

Let it be? Pain control attempts critically amplify attention to somatosensory input

Auteurs: Wouter Durnez, Stefaan Van Damme, PhD

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that the threat of pain may redirect attention towards specific features of the pain stimulus via attentional control settings. For instance, it has been shown that anticipating pain results in attentional prioritization of the location where pain is expected. In contemporary theories on attention and pain, it has been argued that pain control motivation—e.g., attempting to avoid pain—is capable of enhancing these effects. The present study investigated if the threat of pain prioritizes attention towards somatosensory input over other sensory information, and if pursuing a pain control goal augments this effect. In a Temporal Order Judgment experiment, 41 participants were presented with visuo-tactile stimulus pairs and asked to judge which stimulus they had perceived first. Half of all trials were associated with the threat of acute pain, while the other half was not. Furthermore, half of our sample was encouraged to avoid the administration of pain by means of a specified behavioral response, whereas the other half was not. In line with our hypotheses, we found the threat of pain to prioritize attention towards the somatosensory modality, i.e., participants tended to perceive the tactile stimulus as occurring earlier in time than the visual stimulus. Interestingly, in-depth analyses suggested that this effect was predominantly carried by participants who were engaged in pain control efforts. These findings support the idea that pain goals exert top–down attentional control prioritizing pain-relevant sensory information. Clinical relevance and future directions are discussed.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Alcalá-Quintana, R., & García-Pérez, M. A. (2013). Fitting model-based psychometric functions to simultaneity and temporal-order judgment data: MATLAB and R routines. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 972–998. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0325-2.CrossRefPubMed Alcalá-Quintana, R., & García-Pérez, M. A. (2013). Fitting model-based psychometric functions to simultaneity and temporal-order judgment data: MATLAB and R routines. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 972–998. doi:10.​3758/​s13428-013-0325-2.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1.CrossRefPubMed Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. doi:10.​1037/​0033-2909.​133.​1.​1.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Durnez, W., & Van Damme, S. (2015). Trying to fix a painful problem: The impact of pain control attempts on the attentional prioritization of a threatened body location. The Journal of Pain, 16(2), 135–143.CrossRefPubMed Durnez, W., & Van Damme, S. (2015). Trying to fix a painful problem: The impact of pain control attempts on the attentional prioritization of a threatened body location. The Journal of Pain, 16(2), 135–143.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eccleston, C., & Crombez, G. (1999). Pain demands attention. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 356–366.CrossRefPubMed Eccleston, C., & Crombez, G. (1999). Pain demands attention. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 356–366.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
go back to reference Öhman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention and learning: an information-processing perspective. In Kimmel H.D., Van Olst E.H. & Orlebeke J.F. (Eds.) The orienting reflex in human (pp. 55–80). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Öhman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention and learning: an information-processing perspective. In Kimmel H.D., Van Olst E.H. & Orlebeke J.F. (Eds.) The orienting reflex in human (pp. 55–80). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Spence, C., Baddeley, R., Zampini, M., James, R., & Shore, D. I. (2003). Multisensory temporal order judgments: When two locations are better than one. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(2), 318–328. doi:10.3758/BF03194803.CrossRefPubMed Spence, C., Baddeley, R., Zampini, M., James, R., & Shore, D. I. (2003). Multisensory temporal order judgments: When two locations are better than one. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(2), 318–328. doi:10.​3758/​BF03194803.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Spence, C., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 799–832.CrossRef Spence, C., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 799–832.CrossRef
go back to reference Stein, B. E., & Stanford, T. R. (2008). Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of a single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 255–266.CrossRefPubMed Stein, B. E., & Stanford, T. R. (2008). Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of a single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 255–266.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S., & Pivik, J. (1995). The pain catastrophizing scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 524–535.CrossRef Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S., & Pivik, J. (1995). The pain catastrophizing scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 524–535.CrossRef
go back to reference Titchener, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: Macmillan.CrossRef Titchener, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Wiech, K., Legrain, V., Peters, M. L., & Eccleston, C. (2009a). Why become more general when we can be more specific? Comment on Hollins et al. “Perceived intensity and unpleasantness of cutaneous and auditory stimuli: an evaluation of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis” [Pain 2009; 141:215–221], and on Rollman. Pain, 144(3), 342–343. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.04.035. (author reply 343–4).CrossRefPubMed Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Wiech, K., Legrain, V., Peters, M. L., & Eccleston, C. (2009a). Why become more general when we can be more specific? Comment on Hollins et al. “Perceived intensity and unpleasantness of cutaneous and auditory stimuli: an evaluation of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis” [Pain 2009; 141:215–221], and on Rollman. Pain, 144(3), 342–343. doi:10.​1016/​j.​pain.​2009.​04.​035. (author reply 343–4).CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van Damme, S., Gallace, A., Spence, C., Crombez, G., & Moseley, G. L. (2009b). Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures. Brain Research, 1253, 100–106. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.072.CrossRefPubMed Van Damme, S., Gallace, A., Spence, C., Crombez, G., & Moseley, G. L. (2009b). Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures. Brain Research, 1253, 100–106. doi:10.​1016/​j.​brainres.​2008.​11.​072.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Verbruggen, F., & Aron, A. R. (2010). Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(31), 13966–13971. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001957107.CrossRef Verbruggen, F., & Aron, A. R. (2010). Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(31), 13966–13971. doi:10.​1073/​pnas.​1001957107.CrossRef
go back to reference Weinstein, S. (1968). Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. In Kenshalo D. R. (Ed.), The Skin Senses (pp. 195–200). Springfield: Thomas. Weinstein, S. (1968). Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. In Kenshalo D. R. (Ed.), The Skin Senses (pp. 195–200). Springfield: Thomas.
Metagegevens
Titel
Let it be? Pain control attempts critically amplify attention to somatosensory input
Auteurs
Wouter Durnez
Stefaan Van Damme, PhD
Publicatiedatum
29-09-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0712-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2017

Psychological Research 1/2017 Naar de uitgave