Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

8. Kosteneffectiviteit van behandelingen van lage rugklachten

Auteurs : M.W. van Tulder, B.W. Koes

Gepubliceerd in: Evidence-based handelen bij lage rugpijn

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Inleiding

Kosten en kosteneffectiviteit van interventies spelen een steeds belangrijker rol bij de beslissing om nieuwe interventies in te voeren of bestaande interventies te blijven vergoeden vanuit het basispakket van de zorgverzekering. De vraag naar gezondheidszorg neemt toe door de toenemende vergrijzing en de groei van technologische mogelijkheden. De financiële middelen voor de gezondheidszorg zijn echter niet toereikend om volledig aan deze vraag te kunnen voldoen. Er moeten dus keuzes gemaakt worden welke interventies wel en welke niet vergoed worden vanuit het basispakket. Economische evaluaties onderbouwen deze keuzes.

vorige hoofdstuk Implementatie van richtlijnen voor lage rugpijn in de eerstelijnsgezondheidszorg

volgende hoofdstuk Is het mogelijk om subgroepen van patiënten met lage rugpijn te onderscheiden?

Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Third Edition ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

Briggs AH, O’Brien BJ. The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ 2001 Mar; 10(2):179–84.PubMedCrossRef

Lapre R, Rutten F, Schut E. Algemene economie van de gezondheidszorg. Elsevier Gezondheidszorg, 2001.

Van Lienden HW, Boot JMD. Economie van de volksgezondheid. Van Gorcum, Assen, 2011.

Korthals – de Bos I, van Tulder M, van Dieten H, Bouter L. Economic evaluations alongside randomised trials in the field of spinal disorders: principles and methods. Spine 2004; 29: 442–8.PubMedCrossRef

Van der Roer N, Boos N, van Tulder MW. Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disorders. Eur Spine J 2006;15 Suppl 1:S109–17.CrossRef

Lin C, Haas M, Maher CG, Machado LAC, Van Tulder M. Cost-effectiveness of guideline-endorsed treatments for low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011; 20(7):1024–38.PubMedCrossRef

Lin C, Haas M, Maher CG, Machado LAC, Van Tulder M. Cost-effectiveness of general practice care for low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011; 20(7):1012–23.PubMedCrossRef

Uegaki K, de Bruijne MC, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W, van Tulder MW. Economic Evaluations of Occupational Health Interventions from a Company’s Perspective: A Systematic Review of Methods to Estimate the Cost of Health-Related Productivity Loss. J Occup Rehabil. 2011; 21(1):90–9.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19: 2075–94.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Evers S, Goossens M, de Vet H, van Tulder M, Ament A (2005) Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on health economic criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21 (2):240–245PubMed

12.

Appleby J, Devlin N, Parkin D (2007) Nice’s cost effectiveness threshold. BMJ 335(7616):358–359.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Towse A (2009) Should nice’s threshold range for cost per qaly be raised? Yes. BMJ 338:b181.CrossRef

14.

Moore JE, Von Korff M, Cherkin D, Saunders K, Lorig K (2000) A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavioral program for enhancing back pain self care in a primary care setting. Pain 88 (2):145–153.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Von Korff M, Moore JE, Lorig K, Cherkin DC, Saunders K, González VM, Laurent D, Rutter C, Comite F (1998) A randomized trial of a lay person-led self-management group intervention for back pain patients in primary care. Spine 23 (23):2608–2615.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Strong LL, Von Korff M, Saunders K, Moore JE (2006) Cost-effectiveness of two self-care interventions to reduce disability associated with back pain. Spine 31 (15):1639–1645.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H, Mutanen P, Rissanen P, Pahkajarvi H, Levon H, Karpoff H, Roine R (2003) Mini-intervention for subacute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine 28 (6):533–540.PubMed

18.

Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Mutanen P, Roine R, Hurri H, Pohjolainen T (2004) Mini-intervention for subacute low back pain: Two-year follow-up and modifiers of effectiveness. Spine 29 (10):1069–1076.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Niemisto L, Lahtinen-Suopanki T, Rissanen P, Lindgren K-A, Sarna S, Hurri H (2003) A randomized trial of combined manipulation, stabilizing exercises, and physician consultation compared to physician consultation alone for chronic low back pain. Spine 28 (19):2185–2191.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Niemisto L, Rissanen P, Sarna S, Lahtinen-Suopanki T, Lindgren K-A, Hurri H (2005) Cost-effectiveness of combined manipulation, stabilizing exercises, and physician consultation compared to physician consultation alone for chronic low back pain: A prospective randomized trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine 30 (10):1109–1115.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Hlobil H, Uegaki K, Staal JB, de Bruyne MC, Smid T, van Mechelen W (2007) Substantial sick-leave costs savings due to a graded activity intervention for workers with non-specific sub-acute low back pain. Eur Spine J 16 (7):919–924.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Molde Hagen E, Grasdal A, Eriksen HR (2003) Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain: A 3-year follow-up study. Spine 28 (20):2309–2315.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Skouen JS, Grasdal AL, Haldorsen EMH, Ursin H (2002) Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: Randomized controlled study. Spine 27 (9):901–909.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Torstensen TA, Ljunggren AE, Meen HD, Odland E, Mowinckel P, Geijerstam S (1998) Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. A pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine 23 (23):2616–2624.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Kominski GF, Heslin KC, Morgenstern H, Hurwitz EL, Harber PI (2005) Economic evaluation of four treatments for low-back pain: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Med Care 43 (5):428–435.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Seferlis T, Lindholm L, Nemeth G (2000) Cost-minimisation analysis of three conservative treatment programmes in 180 patients sick-listed for acute low-back pain. Scand J Prim Health Care 18 (1):53–57.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Herman PM, Szczurko O, Cooley K, Mills EJ (2008) Cost-effectiveness of naturopathic care for chronic low back pain. Altern Ther Health Med 14 (2):32–39.PubMed

28.

Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Durand MJ, Champagne F, Stock S, Diallo B, Tremblay C (2002) Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: A six year follow up study. Occup Environ Med 59 (12):807–815.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Rivero-Arias O, Gray A, Frost H, Lamb SE, Stewart-Brown S (2006) Cost-utility analysis of physiotherapy treatment compared with physiotherapy advice in low back pain. Spine 31 (12):1381–1387.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Lamb SE, Hansen Z, Lall R, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, Potter R, Underwood MR (2010) Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Lancet 375 (9718):916–923.CrossRef

31.

Critchley DJ, Ratcliffe J, Noonan S, Jones RH, Hurley MV (2007) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability: A pragmatic randomized trial with economic evaluation. Spine 32 (14):1474–1481.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Van der Roer N, van Tulder M, van Mechelen W, de Vet H (2008) Economic evaluation of an intensive group training protocol compared with usual care physiotherapy in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 33 (4):445–451.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Whitehurst DGT, Lewis M, Yao GL, Bryan S, Raftery JP, Mullis R, Hay EM (2007) A brief pain management program compared with physical therapy for low back pain: Results from an economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 57 (3):466–473.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Johnson RE, Jones GT, Wiles NJ, Chaddock C, Potter RG, Roberts C, Symmons DPM, Watson PJ, Torgerson DJ, Macfarlane GJ (2007) Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine 32 (15):1578–1585.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Rivero-Arias O, Campbell H, Gray A, Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J (2005) Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: Cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 330 (7502):1239.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Hollinghurst S, Sharp D, Ballard K, Barnett J, Beattie A, Evans M, Lewith G, Middleton K, Oxford F, Webley F, Little P (2008) Randomised controlled trial of alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ateam) for chronic and recurrent back pain: Economic evaluation. BMJ 337:a2656.CrossRef

37.

UK BEAM Trial Team (2004). United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (uk beam) randomised trial: Cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 329 (7479):1381–1385.CrossRef

38.

Schweikert B, Jacobi E, Seitz R, Cziske R, Ehlert A, Knab J, Leidl R (2006) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding a cognitive behavioral treatment to the rehabilitation of chronic low back pain. J Rheumatol 33 (12):2519–2526.PubMed

39.

Smeets RJ, Severens JL, Beelen S, Vlaeyen JW, Knottnerus J (2009) More is not always better: Cost-effectiveness analysis of combined, single behavioral and single physical rehabilitation programs for chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain 13 (1):71–81.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Goossens ME, Rutten-Van Molken MP, Kole-Snijders AM, Vlaeyen JW, Van Breukelen G, Leidl R (1998) Health economic assessment of behavioural rehabilitation in chronic low back pain: A randomised clinical trial. Health Econ 7 (1):39–51.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Witt CM, Jena S, Selim D, Brinkhaus B, Reinhold T, Wruck K, Liecker B, Linde K, Wegscheider K, Willich SN (2006) Pragmatic randomized trial evaluating the clinical and economic effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol 164 (5):487–496.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Ratcliffe J, Thomas KJ, MacPherson H, Brazier J (2006) A randomised controlled trial of acupuncture care for persistent low back pain: Cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 333 (7569):626.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Abraira V, Lazaro P, Pozo F, Kleinbaum D, Group KAP (2002) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of neuroreflexotherapy for subacute and chronic low back pain in routine general practice: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Spine 27 (11):1149–1159.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Jellema P, van der Roer N, van der Windt DA, van Tulder MW, van der Horst HE, Stalman WA, Bouter LM. Low back pain in general practice: cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychosocial intervention versus usual care. Eur Spine J 2007; 16(11):1812–21.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378(9802):1560–71.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Apeldoorn AT, Bosmans JE, Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of a classification-based system for sub-acute and chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(7):1290–300.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Lambeek LC, Bosmans JE, Van Royen BJ, Van Tulder MW, Van Mechelen W, Anema JR. Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010;341:c6414.CrossRef

48.

Roelofs PD, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Poppel MN, van Mechelen W, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar supports for home care workers with recurrent low back pain: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized-controlled trial. Spine 2010; 35(26):E1619–26.CrossRef

49.

Steenstra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, van Mechelen W. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2006; 16(4):557–78.PubMedCrossRef

50.

van Duijn M, Eijkemans MJ, Koes BW, Koopmanschap MA, Burton KA, Burdorf A. The effects of timing on the cost-effectiveness of interventions for workers on sick leave due to low back pain. Occup Environ Med. 2010 Nov; 67(11):744–50.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Hoeijenbos M, Bekkering T, Lamers L, Hendriks E, van Tulder M, Koopmanschap M. Cost-effectiveness of an active implementation strategy for the Dutch physiotherapy guideline for low back pain. Health Policy 2005; 75:85–98.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Tan SS, Bouwmans CAM. Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek: Methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. Geactualiseerde versie 2010. [Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations]. Diemen: College voor zorgverzekeringen (CVZ); 2011.

Titel: Kosteneffectiviteit van behandelingen van lage rugklachten
Auteurs: M.W. van Tulder
B.W. Koes
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Evidence-based handelen bij lage rugpijn
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-0276-5

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-0277-2

Copyright: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0277-2_8

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Inleiding

Log in om toegang te krijgen