Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 11/2020

10-06-2020

Known-groups validity and responsiveness to change of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS vs. 2.0): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden

Auteurs: David T. Eton, Minji K. Lee, Jennifer L. St. Sauver, Roger T. Anderson

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 11/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to test the known-groups validity and responsiveness to change of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS, vs. 2.0), a measure of treatment burden.

Methods

The PETS and other standard measures were mailed at baseline and 12-month follow-up to adults living with multiple chronic conditions in southeast Minnesota (USA). A sample of 365 people (mean age = 62.1 years) completed both surveys. Baseline, 12-month, and changes in PETS burden scores were examined. Clinical anchors used to test validity included number of diagnoses (2–4 vs. 5+), mental health diagnosis (yes/no), medication adherence and health literacy (suboptimal/optimal), and changes in self-efficacy, global physical, and global mental health (worsening/improving). Independent-samples t-tests were used to compare scores.

Results

PETS scales showed good internal consistency (αs ≥ 0.80). There were few differences across number of diagnoses, but having a mental health diagnosis was associated with higher baseline PETS burden scores (Ps < .05). Suboptimal medication adherence and health literacy over time were associated with worse 12-month PETS burden scores (Ps < .05). Compared with improvements, declines over time in self-efficacy, global physical health, and global mental health were each associated with worsening change scores on PETS impact summary, medical expenses, and bother due to medication reliance and medication side effects (Ps < .05).

Conclusion

Among multi-morbid adults, the PETS demonstrated evidence of known-groups validity and responsiveness to change across both objective (e.g., mental health diagnoses) and subjective anchors (e.g., changes in self-efficacy, global physical, and global mental health).
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
15.
go back to reference Mohammed, M. A., Moles, R. J., Hilmer, S. N., Kouladjian O'Donnel, L., & Chen, T. F. (2018). Development and validation of an instrument for measuring the burden of medicine on functioning and well-being: The Medication-Related Burden Quality of Life (MRB-QoL) tool. British Medical Journal Open, 8(1), e018880. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2017-018880. CrossRef Mohammed, M. A., Moles, R. J., Hilmer, S. N., Kouladjian O'Donnel, L., & Chen, T. F. (2018). Development and validation of an instrument for measuring the burden of medicine on functioning and well-being: The Medication-Related Burden Quality of Life (MRB-QoL) tool. British Medical Journal Open, 8(1), e018880. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2017-018880. CrossRef
20.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). Multiple chronic conditions—A strategic framework: Optimum health and quality of life for individuals with multiple chronic conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). Multiple chronic conditions—A strategic framework: Optimum health and quality of life for individuals with multiple chronic conditions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
26.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
go back to reference Gallacher, K., May, C. R., Montori, V. M., & Mair, F. S. (2011). Understanding patients' experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalization process theory. Annals of Family Medicine, 9(3), 235–243. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gallacher, K., May, C. R., Montori, V. M., & Mair, F. S. (2011). Understanding patients' experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalization process theory. Annals of Family Medicine, 9(3), 235–243. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Metagegevens
Titel
Known-groups validity and responsiveness to change of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS vs. 2.0): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden
Auteurs
David T. Eton
Minji K. Lee
Jennifer L. St. Sauver
Roger T. Anderson
Publicatiedatum
10-06-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02546-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2020

Quality of Life Research 11/2020 Naar de uitgave