Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
Beroepsvorming ergotherapie in België en Nederland hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

2. Kerndomein van ergotherapie

Auteurs : Ton Satink, PhD, Prof. dr. Daphne Kos, Prof. dr. Dominique Van de Velde

Gepubliceerd in: Grondslagen van ergotherapie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

Het kerndomein van ergotherapie is het dagelijks handelen van mensen. Het dagelijks handelen gaat over de dingen die je doet: alleen of samen, omdat iets leuk is om te doen of omdat het van je verwacht wordt. Het dagelijks handelen is onderdeel van taken en rollen die mensen vervullen in de samenleving. Kijk je specifieker naar het dagelijks handelen, dan gaat het om activiteiten die door personen in een bepaalde context worden uitgevoerd en waaraan een betekenis wordt gegeven. Activiteiten kunnen worden ingedeeld op basis van het type activiteit, de betekenis ervan of de beleving die mensen hebben tijdens de uitvoering. Het uitvoeren van activiteiten geeft betekenis aan het leven, sociale relaties en gemeenschappen. Dit maakt dat het dagelijks handelen een krachtig middel is voor verandering of ontwikkeling, alleen of met elkaar. De wetenschap die het dagelijks handelen bestudeert, is Occupational Science en is onder andere gericht op veranderingen op individueel en maatschappelijk niveau.
vorige hoofdstuk Beroepsvorming ergotherapie in België en Nederland
volgende hoofdstuk Gezondheid, welzijn en participatie
Literatuur
1.
Ramugondo EL, Kronenberg F. Explaining collective occupations from a human relations perspective: bridging the individual-collective dichotomy. J Occup Sci. 2015;22:3–16.CrossRef
2.
Meyer A. The philosophy of occupation therapy. Reprinted from the Archives of Occupational Therapy, Volume 1, pp. 1–10, 1922. Am J Occup Ther. 1977;31:639–42.
3.
Pierce D. Occupational science for occupational therapy: Slack Inc.; 2013.
4.
Gerlach AJ, Teachman G, Laliberte-Rudman D, Aldrich RM, Huot S. Expanding beyond individualism: engaging critical perspectives on occupation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25:35–43.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Christiansen C, Bass JD, Baum CM. Theory, models, frameworks, and classifications. In: Christiansen C, Bass JD, Baum CM, editors. Occupational therapy: performance, participation, and well-being. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2015.
6.
Law MC, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. 1996;63:9–23.
7.
Polatajko H, Davis J, Hobson S, Landry JE, Mandich A, Street SL, et al. Meeting the responsibility that comes with the privilege: introducing a taxonomic code for understanding occupation. Can J Occup Ther Revue Canadienne d’ergothérapie. 2005;71:261–8.
8.
Polatajko HJ, Backman C, Baptiste S, et al. Human occupation in context. In: Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ, editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. 2nd edition. CAOT Publications ACE; 2013.
9.
Brink C. Zelfregie, eigen kracht, zelfredzaamheid en eigen verantwoordelijkheid. De begrippen ontward. Movisie. 2013.
10.
11.
Graff MJL. Ergotherapie en de kracht van het betekenisvol dagelijks handelen. Nijmegen: Inaugurele rede Radboud University; 2019.
12.
Satink T. What about self-management post-stroke? – Challenges for stroke survivors, spouses and professionals. Enschede: Ipskamp Printing; 2016.
13.
Christiansen CH. The 1999 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. Defining lives: occupation as identity: An essay on competence, coherence, and the creation of meaning. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:547–58.
14.
Rebeiro KL, Day DG, Semeniuk B, O’Brien MC, Wilson B. Northern initiative for social action: an occupation-based mental health program. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:493–500.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Wilcock AA, Hocking C. An occupational perspective on health. 3rd edition. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated; 2015.
17.
Hammell KW. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:296–305.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Davis JP, HJ. Occupational development. In: Christiansen CT, EA, editor. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2010. pp. 135–74.
19.
Christiansen C, Townsend E. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2011.
20.
Philippa M, Debrabandere F, Quak A, Schoonheim T, Van der Sijs N. Etymologisch Woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam; 2009.
21.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
22.
23.
Schkade JK, Schultz S. Occupational adaptation: toward a holistic approach for contemporary practice, Part 1. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46:829–37.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Townsend E. Enabling occupation, an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2002.
26.
Ikiugu MN, Pollard N. Meaningful living across the lifespann: occupation-based intervention strategies for occupational therapists and scientists. London: Whting & Birch Ltd.; 2015.
27.
Frankl VE. De zin van het bestaan – Een psycholoog beleeft het concentratiekamp & een inleiding tot de logotherapie. 14th edition. Rotterdam: Uitgeversmaatschappij Ad. Donker; 2014.
28.
Wilcock AA. Occupation and health: are they one and the same? J Occup Sci. 2007;14:3–8.CrossRef
29.
Bar MA, Jarus T. The effect of engagement in everyday occupations, role overload and social support on health and life satisfaction among mothers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:6045–65.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Roberts AEK, Bannigan K. Dimensions of personal meaning from engagement in occupations: a metasynthesis. Can J Occup Ther. 2018;85:386–96.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Turner A. Health through occupation: beyond the evidence. J Occup Sci. 2007;14:9–15.CrossRef
32.
Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ, Therapists CAoO. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. Can Assoc Occup Therapists. 2013.
33.
34.
Whiteford G, Wright-St CV. Occupation & practice in context. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
35.
Christiansen CH, Baum CM, Bass J. The person-environment-occupational performance model (PEOP). In: Duncan EAS, editor. Foundations for practice in occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2015. pp. 93–104.
36.
Townsend E, Polatajko, H; Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, CAOT. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. Ottawa, Canadia: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Publications; 2007.
37.
Pierce D. Occupation by design, building therapeutic power. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2003.
38.
Csíkszentmihályi M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row; 1990.
39.
Satink T, Josephsson S, Zajec J, Cup E, De Swart B, Nijhuis-van der Sanden M. Negotiating role management through everyday activities: narratives in action of two stroke survivors and their spouses. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2354–64.
40.
Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation. Theory and application. 3rd edition. Baltimore – Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams and Wilkins; 2002.
41.
Schkade J, McClung M. Occupational adaptation in practice: concepts and cases. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2001.
42.
Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. 2nd edition. Pearson Education; 2011.
43.
Kiepek N. Innocent observers? Discursive choices and the construction of ‘occupation.’ J Occup Sci. 2021;28:235–48.CrossRef
44.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists C. CAOT position statement: occupations and health. Occup Ther Now. 2009;11:24–6.
45.
Van Hartingsveldt MJ, Logister-Proost I, Kinébanian A. Beroepsprofiel ergotherapeut. Utrecht: Ergotherapie Nederland/Boom Lemma; 2010.
46.
Zemke R, Clark F. Co-occupations of mothers and children. In: Zemke R, Clark F, editors. Occupational science, the evolving discipline. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1996. pp. 213–5.
47.
Van Nes F. Everyday activities of ageing couples: changes in the face of declining health. Doctoral thesis. Enschede: Gildeprint Drukkerijen; 2013.
48.
49.
Segal R. The construction of family occupations: a study of families with children who have attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Can J Occup Ther. 1998;65:292.CrossRef
50.
Kantartzis S, Molineux M. Collective occupation in public spaces and the construction of the social fabric: L’occupation collective dans les espaces publics et la construction du tissu social. Can J Occup Ther. 2017;84:168–77.CrossRefPubMed
51.
The American Occuptational Therapy Association. A occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. 3rd edition. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68:S1–48.
52.
Motimele M, Peters L. Understanding human occupation. In: Dsouza SA, Galvaan R, Ramugondo EL, editors. Concepts in occupational therapy – understanding southern perspectives. Manipal: Manipal University Press; 2017.
53.
Morris K, Cox DL. Developing a descriptive framework for ‘occupational engagement.’ J Occup Sci. 2017;24:152–64.CrossRef
54.
Persson D, Jonsson H. Importance of experiential challenges in a balanced life: micro- and macro- perspectives. In: Matuska K, Christiansen CH, Polatajko H, Davis J, editors. Life balance: multidisciplinary theories and research. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2009.
55.
Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
56.
57.
Twinley R. The dark side of occupation: a concept for consideration. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:301–3.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Twinley R. The dark side of occupation. In: Jacobs K, Macrae N, editors. Occupational therapy essentials for clinical competence. 3rd edition: SLACK Incorporated; 2017. pp. 29–36.
59.
Kiepek N, Magalhaes L. Addictions and impulse-control disorders as occupation: a selected literature review and synthesis. J Occup Sci. 2011;18:254–76.CrossRef
60.
Stewart KE, Fischer TM, Hirji R, Davis JA. Toward the reconceptualization of the relationship between occupation and health and well-being. Can J Occup Ther. 2016;83:249–59.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Jonsson H. The first steps into the third age: the retirement process from a Swedish perspective. Occup Ther Int. 2011;18:32–8.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation. 2nd ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013.
63.
Madsen J, Josephsson S. Engagement in occupation as an inquiring process: exploring the situatedness of occupation. J Occup Sci. 2017;24:13.CrossRef
64.
Erlandsson LK, Christiansen CA. The complexity and patterns of human occupations. In: Christiansen C, Baum C, Bass J, editors. Occupational therapy: performance, participation and well-being. Thorafor, NJ: Slack; 2015.
65.
Case-Smith J. Development of childhood occupations. In: Case-Smith J, Allen AS, Pratt PN, editors. Occupational therapy for children. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2015. pp. 65–101.
66.
Edwards D, Christiansen C. Occupational development. In: Christiansen C, CB, CB-H, editors. Occupational therapy: performance, participation and well-being. Thorafor, NJ: Slack; 2005. pp. 113–127.
67.
Yerxa EJ. An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occup Ther Health Care. 1990;6:1–17.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Clark F, Parham F, Carlson M, Frank G, Jackson J, Pierce D. Occupational science: academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:10.CrossRef
69.
Kumas -Tan Z, Townsend E. Occupational science: What can it do for the practice of occupational therapy. Western Shore, Nova Scotia: OT Atlantic; 2003.
70.
Hulstein-van Gennep G, Ten Hove-Moerdijk K. De activiteitenweger - Methodisch werken aan belasting en belastbaarheid. Ned Tijdschr Ergotherapie. 2008:22–5.
71.
Backman CL. Occupational balance: exploring the relationships among daily occupations and their influence on well-being. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:202–9.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Nayar S, Stanley M. Qualitative research methods in occupational science and occupational therapy. New York & London: Routeledge; 2015.
73.
Forwell S. CAOT Presidential address: Informing therapy with studies in occupation; 2008.
Metagegevens
Titel
Kerndomein van ergotherapie
Auteurs
Ton Satink, PhD
Prof. dr. Daphne Kos
Prof. dr. Dominique Van de Velde
Copyright
2023
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Grondslagen van ergotherapie

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2828-4

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2829-1

Copyright: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2829-1_2