Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The graded response model (GRM), which is based on item response theory (IRT), was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms in an ADHD rating scale. To accomplish this, parents and teachers completed the DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale (DARS; Gomez et al., Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 265–274, 1999) for a group of 1,475 primary school-aged children. The results for the discrimination parameters showed that all symptoms for both groups of respondents were generally good for discriminating their respective latent traits. For virtually all symptoms, their threshold values showed moderate to large increases in the level of the latent trait at each subsequent response dichotomy, with the symptoms being especially good at representing the appropriate traits from mean to moderately high trait levels. The item information function values for most symptoms indicated reasonable reliability from, approximately, the mean trait levels to moderately high trait levels. These findings indicate good psychometric properties for the parent and teacher ratings of the DARS. The implications of the findings for the use of the DARS and other similar scales are discussed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders III. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—IV text revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Anastopoulos, A. D., & Shelton, T. L. (2001). Assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. New York: Kluwer.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1993). Estimated resident population by age and sex (Catalogue No. 3201.2). Canberra: Author.
Barkley, R. A. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
DuPaul, G. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., Power, T. J., Reid, R., McGoey, K. E., & Ikeda, M. J. (1998). Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms: Factor structure, normative data, and psychometric properties. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20, 83–102. CrossRef
DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., Reid, R., McGoey, K. E., & Ikeda, M. J. (1997). Teacher ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: Factor structure and normative data. Psychological Assessment, 9, 436–444. CrossRef
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lord, F. N., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
Power, T. J., Andrews, T. J., Eiraldi, R. B., Doherty, B. J., Ikeda, B., & DuPaul, G. J. (1998). Evaluating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using multiple informants: The incremental utility of combining teacher with parent reports. Psychological Assessment, 10, 250–260. CrossRef
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reeves, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related Quality of Life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information systems (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S22–S31. CrossRef
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, no. 17.
Sprafkin, J., Gadow, K. D., & Nolan, E. E. (2001). The utility of the DSM-IV-Referenced Screening Instrument for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 182–191. CrossRef
Stark, S., Chemyshenko, S., Chua, W. L., & Wadlington, P. (2001). Computing chi-square statistics and fit-plots using the MODFIT program. http://work.psych.uiuc.edu/irt/mdf_modfit.asp, downloaded on 6 October 2003.
Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1995). Item response theory in personality research. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG: Multiple category item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1988). Data analysis using item response theory. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 385–395. CrossRef
Wender, E. (2004). ADHD symptoms and parent–teacher agreement. (Commentary). Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 48–49. CrossRef
- Item Response Theory Analyses of the Parent and Teacher Ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale
- Springer US