Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1469-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Comparison of patient-reported outcomes may be invalidated by the occurrence of item bias, also known as differential item functioning. We show two ways of using structural equation modeling (SEM) to detect item bias: (1) multigroup SEM, which enables the detection of both uniform and nonuniform bias, and (2) multidimensional SEM, which enables the investigation of item bias with respect to several variables simultaneously.
Gender- and age-related bias in the items of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond and Snaith in Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370, 1983) from a sample of 1068 patients was investigated using the multigroup SEM approach and the multidimensional SEM approach. Results were compared to the results of the ordinal logistic regression, item response theory, and contingency tables methods reported by Cameron et al. (Qual Life Res 23:2883–2888, 2014).
Both SEM approaches identified two items with gender-related bias and two items with age-related bias in the Anxiety subscale, and four items with age-related bias in the Depression subscale. Results from the SEM approaches generally agreed with the results of Cameron et al., although the SEM approaches identified more items as biased.
SEM provides a flexible tool for the investigation of item bias in health-related questionnaires. Multidimensional SEM has practical and statistical advantages over multigroup SEM, and over other item bias detection methods, as it enables item bias detection with respect to multiple variables, of various measurement levels, and with more statistical power, ultimately providing more valid comparisons of patients’ well-being in both research and clinical practice.
Cameron, I. M., Scott, N. W., Adler, M., & Reid, I. C. (2014). A comparison of three methods of assessing differential item functioning (DIF) in the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: ordinal logistic regression, Rasch analysis and the Mantel chi square procedure. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2883–2888. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0719-3. CrossRefPubMed
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jöreskog, K. G. (2002). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 631–639. doi: 10.2307/2285946.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 users’ guide (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Scientific software international Inc.
Oort, F. J. (1992). Using restricted factor analysis to detect item bias. Methodika, 6, 150–166.
Oort, F. J. (1998). Simulation study of item bias detection with restricted factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 107–124. CrossRef
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
- Item bias detection in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using structural equation modeling: comparison with other item bias detection methods
Mathilde G. E. Verdam
Frans J. Oort
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
- Springer International Publishing