Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

9. Is het mogelijk om subgroepen van patiënten met lage rugpijn te onderscheiden?

Auteurs : M.W. van Tulder, B.W. Koes

Gepubliceerd in: Evidence-based handelen bij lage rugpijn

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Inleiding

Er zijn zeer veel verschillende behandelingen beschikbaar voor patiënten met lage rugpijn. Zoals bleek in hoofdstuk 4 en 5 van dit boek zijn sommige behandelingen effectief gebleken in effectstudies, andere behandelingen niet. In het algemeen zijn de effecten van de beschikbare behandelingen niet erg groot en houden ze vaak slechts op de korte termijn stand. Indien patiënten langere tijd gevolgd worden, bijvoorbeeld tot twaalf maanden, zijn effecten meestal niet meer aantoonbaar. Er is geen enkele behandeling met grote, significante en consistente effecten voor patiënten met aspecifieke lage rugpijn.1

vorige hoofdstuk Kosteneffectiviteit van behandelingen van lage rugklachten

Foster NE Barriers and progress in the treatment of low back pain. BMC Med. 2011 Sep 27;9:108. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-108.

Borkan JM, Koes B, Reis S, Cherkin DC. A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain. Reexamining priorities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 15; 23(18):1992–6.CrossRef

Cunha Menezes Costa L da, Koes BW, Pransky G, Borkan J, Maher CG, Smeets RJ. Primary Care Research Priorities in Low Back Pain: an update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 7. [Epub ahead of print]

Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, Koes BW, Croft PR, Hay E. Treatment-based subgroups of low back pain: a guide to appraisal of research studies and a summary of current evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010 Apr;24(2):181–91. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.003.

Billis EV, McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA: Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison. Eur Spine J 2007, 16: 865–879.PubMedCrossRef

Apeldoorn AT, Ostelo RW, van Helvoirt H, Fritz JM, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW. The cost-effectiveness of a treatment-based classification system for low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Mar 26;11:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-58.

Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937–9.

Koes B. Management of low back pain in primary care: a new approach Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1530-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61033–7.

Delitto A, Erhard RE, Bowling RW: A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment. Phys Ther 1995, 75: 470–485.PubMed

10.

Delitto A, Shulman AD, Rose SJ: On developing expert-based decision-support systems in physical therapy: the NIOSH low back atlas. Phys Ther 1989, 69: 554–558.PubMed

11.

McKenzie R, May S: The lumbar spine. Mechanical diagnosis & therapy, 2^nd edition. Waikanae: Spinal Publications New Zealand Ltd; 2003.

12.

Delitto A, Cibulka MT, Erhard RE, Bowling RW, Tenhula JA: Evidence for use of an extension-mobilization category in acute low back syndrome: a prescriptive validation pilot study. Phys Ther 1993, 73: 216–222.PubMed

13.

Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J, Wainner R, Magel J, Rendeiro D et al.: A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002, 27: 2835–2843.CrossRef

14.

Fritz JM, Delitto A, Erhard RE: Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003, 28: 1363–1371.

15.

Schenk R, Jozefczyk C, Kopf A: A randomized trial comparing interventions in patients with lumbar posterior derangement. J Man Manip Ther 2003, 11: 95–102.CrossRef

16.

Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR et al.: A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141: 920–928.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Long A, Donelson R, Fung T: Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004, 29: 2593–2602.CrossRef

18.

Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, McGill SM: Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86: 1753–1762.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Fritz JM, Childs JD, Flynn TW: Pragmatic application of a clinical prediction rule in primary care to identify patients with low back pain with a good prognosis following a brief spinal manipulation intervention. BMC Fam Pract 2005, 6: 29.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Childs JD: Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 89:1745–1752.CrossRef

21.

Brennan GP, Fritz JM, Hunter SJ, Thackeray A, Delitto A, Erhard RE: Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute „nonspecific“ low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006, 31: 623–631.CrossRef

22.

Fritz JM, Lindsay W, Matheson JW, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ, Moffit SD et al.: Is there a subgroup of patients with low back pain likely to benefit from mechanical traction? Results of a randomized clinical trial and subgrouping analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007a, 32: E793–E800.CrossRef

23.

Browder DA, Childs JD, Cleland JA, Fritz JM: Effectiveness of an extension-oriented treatment approach in a subgroup of subjects with low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2007, 87: 1608–1618.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Apeldoorn AT, Ostelo RW, van Helvoirt H, Fritz JM, Knol DL, van Tulder MW, de Vet HC. A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of a classification-based system for subacute and chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 15;37(16):1347–56. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824d9f2b.

25.

McKenzie RA: The lumbar spine: mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand: Spinal Publications; 1981.

26.

Kilby J, Stigant M, Roberts A: The reliability of back pain assessment by physiotherapists, using a „McKenzie algorithm“. Physiother 1990, 76: 579–583.CrossRef

27.

Riddle DL, Rothstein JM: Intertester reliability of McKenzie’s classifications of the syndrome types present in patients with low back pain. Spine 1993, 18: 133–1344.CrossRef

28.

Clare HA, Adams R, Maher CG: A systematic review of efficacy of McKenzie therapy for spinal pain. Aust J Physiother 2004, 50: 209–216.PubMed

29.

Razmjou H, Kramer JF, Yamada R: Intertester reliability of the McKenzie evaluation in assessing patients with mechanical low-back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000, 30: 368–383.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Clare HA, Adams R, Maher CG: Reliability of McKenzie classification of patients with cervical or lumbar pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005, 28: 122–127.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Stankovic R, Johnell O: Conservative treatment of acute low-back pain. A prospective randomized trial: McKenzie method of treatment versus patient education in „mini back school“. Spine 1990, 15: 120–123.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battie M, Street J, Barlow W: A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low-back pain. N Eng J Med 1998, 339: 1021–29.CrossRef

33.

Petersen T, Kryger P, Ekdahl C, Olsen S, Jacobsen S: The effect of McKenzie therapy as compared with that of intensive strengthening training for the treatment of patients with subacute or chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2002, 27: 1702–1709.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Machado LA, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Clare H, McAuley JH. The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2010 Jan 26;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-10.

35.

Machado LA, de Souza Mv, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML. The McKenzie method for low back pain: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20; 31(9):E254–62.CrossRef

36.

Nederlandse Vereniging voor Anesthesiologie (NVA). Richtlijn Wervelkolomgerelateerde pijnklachten van de lage rug. www.anesthesiologie.nl

37.

Maas ET, Juch JN, Groeneweg JG, Ostelo RW, Koes BW, Verhagen AP, Raamt M, Wille F, Huygen FJ, Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of minimal interventional procedures for chronic mechanical low back pain: design of four randomised controlled trials with an economic evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 28;13(1):260. [Epub ahead of print].PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Is het mogelijk om subgroepen van patiënten met lage rugpijn te onderscheiden?
Auteurs: M.W. van Tulder
B.W. Koes
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Evidence-based handelen bij lage rugpijn
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-0276-5

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-0277-2

Copyright: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0277-2_9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Inleiding

Log in om toegang te krijgen