Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Distraction is an emotion regulation strategy that has an ambiguous status within cognitive-behavior therapy. According to some treatment protocols it is counterproductive, whereas according to other protocols it is seen as a quite useful strategy. The main purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that distraction is adaptive when combined with active acceptance, but maladaptive when combined with avoidant strategies. A non-clinical community sample of adults (N = 638) and a clinical sample (N = 172) completed measures of emotion regulation and well-being. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups with different profiles on six emotion regulation variables, and these subgroups were then compared on well-being (positive and negative emotionality, and life quality) and on clinical status. A nine-cluster solution was chosen on the basis of explained variance and homogeneity coefficients. Two of these clusters had almost identical scores on distraction, but showed otherwise very different profiles (distraction combined with acceptance vs. distraction combined with avoidance). The distraction-acceptance cluster scored significantly higher than the distraction-avoidance cluster on all measures of well-being; it was also under-represented in the clinical sample, whereas the distraction-avoidance cluster was over-represented. Limitations include a cross-sectional design, and use of self-report measures. The findings suggest that distraction may be either adaptive or maladaptive, depending on whether it is combined with an attitude of acceptance or avoidance.
Arch, J. J., & Craske, M. G. (2008). Acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: different treatments, similar mechanisms? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 263–279.
Barlow, D. H., Farchione, T. J., Fairholme, C. P., Ellard, K. K., Boisseau, C. L., Allen, L. B., & Ehrenreich-Way, J. (2011). Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bergman, L. R. (1998). A pattern-oriented approach to studying individual development: Snapshots and processes. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.). Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 82–31). Thousand Oaks
Bergman, L. R., & El-Khouri, B. M. (1987). EXACON: A fortran 77 program for the exact analysis of single cells in a contingency table. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 155–161. CrossRef
Bergman, L. R., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2002). SLEIPNER. A statistical package for pattern-oriented analyses. Version 2.1. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Psychology. www.psychol-ogy.su.se/sleipner .
Berking, M., Wupperman, P., Reichardt, A., Pejic, T., Dippel, A., & Znoj, H. (2008). Emotion-regulation skills as treatment targets in psychotherapy. Behavior Research and Therapy, 46, 1230–1237. CrossRef
Blackledge, J. T., & Hayes, S. C. (2001). Emotion regulation in acceptance and commitment therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 161–165.
Boulanger, J. L., Hayes, S. C., & Pistorello, J. (2010). In A. M. Kring & D. M. Sloan (Eds.), Emotion regulation and psychopathology (pp. 107–136). New York: Guilford Press.
Clark, D. M. (1999). Anxiety disorders: why they persist and how to treat them. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 5–27. CrossRef
Craske, M. G., & Barlow, D. H. (2008). Panic disorder and agoraphobia. In D. H. Barlow (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders (4th ed., pp. 1–65). New York: Guilford Press.
Gratz, K. L. (2010). An acceptance-based emotion regulation group therapy fordeliberate self-harm. Unpublished treatment manual. Jackson: University of Mississippi Medical Center.
Gratz, K. L., & Tull, M. T. (2011). Extending research on the utility of an adjunctive emotion regulation group therapy for deliberate self-harm among women with borderline personality pathology. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 316–326. CrossRef
Hayes, S. C. (2008). Climbing our hills: a beginning conversation on the comparison of acceptance and commitment therapy and traditional cognitive behavioral therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 286–295.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.
LeDoux, J. (1993). Emotional networks in the brain. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 109–118). New York: Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M. (1993b). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Publications.
Russel, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172. CrossRef
Wolgast, M., Lundh, L.-G., & Viborg, G. (2012). Cognitive restructuring and acceptance: an empirically grounded conceptual analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research. doi: 10.1007/s10608-012-9477-0.
- Is Distraction an Adaptive or Maladaptive Strategy for Emotion Regulation? A Person-Oriented Approach
- Springer US
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505