Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
During the past 20 years involuntary memories have been established as a noteworthy phenomenon, which occur spontaneously in everyday life and with greater frequency than expected. Other types of ideations also occur involuntarily and very frequently, both in the normal population and in clinical groups. The aim of this paper was to assess for the first time whether involuntary memories and involuntary future thoughts differ in the amount of cognitive resources, considering that both are experienced as being rather automatic. As in previous work on mind wandering, this was done by assessing the effect of different conditions on frequency of spontaneous thoughts about past and future. Involuntary memories and future thoughts were obtained in an experimental setting (vigilance task) that mimics a mind-wandering task. In it, participants saw slides (trials) with horizontal or vertical (target) lines. In half or one-fourth of the trials verbal cues were also presented. In a third condition one-fourth of the trials had verbal cues and one-fourth had simple arithmetic calculations. Participants were asked to report any mental content that crosses their mind when the vigilance task stopped. Results show that the manipulation modulates the number of both involuntary memories and future thoughts, and both engage cognitive resources. Future involuntary thoughts seem to require more cognitive effort than involuntary memories and, specifically, future scenarios require more cognitive resources than both involuntary memories and future plans. The results support previous findings showing that reporting spontaneous mental contents makes use of cognitive resources and are discussed linking the involuntary memory literature with mind wandering and metacognitive processes.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Antrobus, J. S. (1968). Information theory and stimulus independent thought. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(4), 423–430.
Antrobus, J. S., Singer, L., Goldstein, S., & Fortgang, M. (1970). Mind-wandering and cognitive structure. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 32(2), 242–252. CrossRef
Baddeley, A. D. (1986) Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ball, C. T. (2007). Can we elicit involuntary autobiographical memories in the laboratory? In J. H. Mace (Ed.), Involuntary memory (pp. 127–152). Malden: Blackwell. CrossRef
Ball, C. T., Mace, J. H., & Corona, H. (2007). Cues to the gusts of memory. In J. H. Mace (Ed.), Involuntary memory (pp. 113–126). Malden: Blackwell Publishing. CrossRef
Batool, I., & Mazzoni, G. (2011). Involuntary memories: are pictorial cues more effective? New York: Poster presented at ICOM.
Berntsen, D. (1996). Involuntary autobiographical memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 435–454. CrossRef
Berntsen, D. (2009). Involuntary autobiographical memories. An introduction to the unbidden past. CrossRef
Berntsen, D., & Hall, N. M. (2004). The episodic nature of involuntary autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 789–803. CrossRef
Berntsen, D., Staugaard, S. R., & Sørensen, L. M. T. (2013). Why am I remembering this now? Predicting the occurrence of involuntary (spontaneous) episodic memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 426–444. CrossRef
Brandimonte, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1995). Prospective MemoryTheory and Applications. NY: NY, Psychology Press.
Carvalho, C., Mazzoni, G., & Kirsch, I. (2014). The effect of posthypnotic suggestion and task difficulty on adherence to health-related requests. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice. 1, 92–102.
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: the self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 541–560. CrossRef
Chin, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2010) Meta-awareness. In W. P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness (pp. 33–41). New York: Elsevier.
Cole, S. N., Staugaard, S. R., & Berntsen, D. (2016). Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 376–389. CrossRef
Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 597–628. CrossRef
D’Argembeau, A., Ortoleva, C., Jurmentier, S., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). Component processes underlying future thinking. Memory & Cognition, 38(6), 809–819. CrossRef
D’Argembeau, A., Renaud, O., & Van der Linden, M. (2011). Frequency, characteristics and functions of future-oriented thoughts in daily life. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 96–103. CrossRef
Ernst, A., & D’Argembeau, A. (2017). Make it real: Belief in occurrence within episodic future thought. Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 1045–1061. CrossRef
Gardiner, J. M., Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18(1), 23–30. CrossRef
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. CrossRef
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. CrossRef
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 356–388. CrossRef
Johnson Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71–115. CrossRef
Johnson Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Memory as something that can be counted vs. memory as something that can be counted on. In D. J. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel & M. K. Johnson (Eds.) Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications (vol. 2, pp 3–18). HillSDale: Erlbaum.
Kvavilashvili L., & Ellis J. (1996). Variety of intentions: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, L. O. Einstein & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillside: LEA.
Mace, J. H. (2004). Involuntary autobiographical memories are highly dependent on abstract cuing: The proustian view is incorrect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 893–899. CrossRef
Mace, J. H. (2007). Involuntary memory: New perspectives in cognitive psychology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. CrossRef
Mazzoni, G., Vannucci M., & Batool I. (2014). Manipulating cues in involuntary autobiographical memory: Are pictorial cues more effective? Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1076–1085. CrossRef
Mazzoni, G., & Kirsch, I. (2002). Autobiographical memories and beliefs: a preliminary metacognitive model. In T. Perfect & B. Schwartz (Eds.) Applied metacognition (pp. 121–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144. CrossRef
Rubin, D. C. (Ed.). (1996). Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schlagman, S., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2008). Involuntary autobiographical memories in and outside the laboratory: How different are they from voluntary autobiographical memories? Memory& Cognition, 36, 920–932. CrossRef
Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(8), 339–344. CrossRef
Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2005). Zoning out while reading: evidence for dissociation between experience and metaconsciousness. In D. T. Levin. (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children. Cambridge: MIT press.
Schooler, J. W., & Smallwood, J. (2007) Meta-awareness. In K. Vohs, R. Baumeister (Eds.) Encyclopedia of social psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., et al. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 319–326.
Scoboria, A., Mazzoni, G., Ernst, A., & D’Argembeau, A. (2018). Measuring belief in occurrence for past and future autobiographical events. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice. Submitted for publication.
Shiffman, S. (2000). Real-time self-report of momentary states in the natural environment: Computerized ecological momentary assessment. In A. A. Stone, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates (pp. 277–296). The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice.
Singer, J. L. (1966). Daydreaming: An introduction to the experimental study of inner experience. New York: Crown Publishing Group/Random House.
Smallwood, J. (2010). Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 202–207. CrossRef
Somos, E., Mazzoni, G., & Jellema, T. (2015). The effortfulness of direct versus generative retrieval of autobiographical memories. Paper presented at ICOM6, 17–22 July, Budapest.
Teasdale, J. D., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working-memory and stimulus-independent thought: effects of memory load and presentation rate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(4), 417–433. CrossRef
Teasdale, J. D., et al. (1995). Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Memory & Cognition, 23, 551–559. CrossRef
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373. CrossRef
Vannucci, M., Hanczakowski, M., Pelagatti, C., Mazzoni, G., Paccani, C. (2014). Why aren’t we flooded by involuntary autobiographical memories? Few cues are more effective than many, Psychological Research. 1, 1–9.
Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 442–452.
Wyer, N. A., Neilens, H. L., Perfect, T. J., & Mazzoni, G. (2011). Automatic and ironic behavior are both mediated by changes in the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1300–1303. CrossRef
- Involuntary memories and involuntary future thinking differently tax cognitive resources
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772