Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2011

01-11-2011 | Original Article

Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task

Auteurs: Eric H. Schumacher, Hillary Schwarb, Erin Lightman, Eliot Hazeltine

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The neurocognitive architecture for response selection is uncertain. Some theorists suggest that it is mediated by an amodal central mechanism, whereas others propose a set of independent control mechanisms. In a functional neuroimaging experiment, we investigated the nature of response selection by examining how its underlying brain mechanisms are affected by stimulus modality. To do this, we used a modified flanker task, in which the target and flanker (distractor) stimuli differed in time rather than space, making it accessible for both visual and auditory stimuli. As in the traditional flanker task, larger reaction times were observed for incongruent than congruent trials (i.e., a congruency effect) for both modalities. Congruency affected brain activation for both modalities in prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and the putamen. Modality-dependent activation was found in additional prefrontal and parietal regions for the visual modality and in left inferior prefrontal cortex for the auditory modality. Modality-dependent activity specifically related to response congruency was also found in sensory cortical regions. These data suggest that modality affects the brain regions throughout the cortex mediating response selection even for conceptually identical stimuli and tasks. They are consistent with the hypothesis that (at least partially) independent brain networks mediate response selection and that input modality may be a powerful factor for organizing neural activity to support task performance.
Voetnoten
1
The RT data were also analyzed with two 2 × 2 ANOVAs with modality (auditory and visual) and congruency as factors. The first ANOVA compared incongruent to identical congruent trials. The second ANOVA compared incongruent to nonidentical congruent. There were main effects of modality for both ANOVAs: 1) F(1,15) = 31.75, p < 0.001; 2) F(1,15) = 24.23, p < 0.001. There were main effects of congruency for both ANOVAs: 1) F(1,15) = 81.64, p < 0.001; (2) F(1,15) = 5.26, p < 0.05. The interaction was not significant for either ANOVA: 1) F(1,15) = 0.37, p = 0.55; 2) F(1,15) = 0.38, p = 0.55. These analyses show that there were behavioral congruency effects both when there was stimulus repetition between the congruent distractors and targets and when there was not.
 
2
ANOVAs were also conducted on all ROI data with the nonidentical congruent condition replacing the identical congruent condition. Results from these analyses were consistent with the reported analyses.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Anderson, J. R., Taatgen, N. A., & Byrne, M. D. (2005). Learning to achieve perfect, timesharing: Architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 31(4), 749–761.PubMedCrossRef Anderson, J. R., Taatgen, N. A., & Byrne, M. D. (2005). Learning to achieve perfect, timesharing: Architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 31(4), 749–761.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Botvinick, M., Nytrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179–181.PubMedCrossRef Botvinick, M., Nytrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179–181.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108(4), 847–869.PubMedCrossRef Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108(4), 847–869.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, A., & Feintuch, U. (2002). The dimensional-action system: a distinct visual system. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action (Vol. 19, pp. 587–608). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cohen, A., & Feintuch, U. (2002). The dimensional-action system: a distinct visual system. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action (Vol. 19, pp. 587–608). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous-flow model of human information-processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 529–533.PubMedCrossRef Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous-flow model of human information-processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 529–533.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dronkers, N. F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384(6605), 159–161.PubMedCrossRef Dronkers, N. F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384(6605), 159–161.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dux, P. E., Ivanoff, J., Asplund, C. L., & Marois, R. (2006). Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved fMRI. Neuron, 52(6), 1109–1120.PubMedCrossRef Dux, P. E., Ivanoff, J., Asplund, C. L., & Marois, R. (2006). Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved fMRI. Neuron, 52(6), 1109–1120.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 374–380.PubMedCrossRef Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 374–380.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRef Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information-processing in visual-search—continuous-flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25(4), 249–263.CrossRef Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information-processing in visual-search—continuous-flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25(4), 249–263.CrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Bunge, S. A., Scanlon, M. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition. Neuropsychologia, 41(9), 1208–1217.PubMedCrossRef Hazeltine, E., Bunge, S. A., Scanlon, M. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition. Neuropsychologia, 41(9), 1208–1217.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Lightman, E., Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2011). The boundaries of sequential modulations: Evidence for set-level control. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance. doi:10.1037/a0024662 (in press). Hazeltine, E., Lightman, E., Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2011). The boundaries of sequential modulations: Evidence for set-level control. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance. doi:10.​1037/​a0024662 (in press).
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., & Ruthruff, E. (2006). Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 70(6), 504–513.CrossRef Hazeltine, E., & Ruthruff, E. (2006). Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 70(6), 504–513.CrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52(4), 291–345.PubMedCrossRef Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52(4), 291–345.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 527–545.PubMedCrossRef Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 527–545.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Weinstein, A., & Ivry, R. B. (2008). Parallel response selection after callosotomy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 526–540.PubMedCrossRef Hazeltine, E., Weinstein, A., & Ivry, R. B. (2008). Parallel response selection after callosotomy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 526–540.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Henson, R. N. (2007). Efficient Experimental Design for fMRI. In J. T. Ashburner, S. J. Kiebel, T. E. Nichols, & W. D. Penny (Eds.), Statistical parametric mapping: The analysis of functional brain images (pp. 193–210). London: Academic Press. Henson, R. N. (2007). Efficient Experimental Design for fMRI. In J. T. Ashburner, S. J. Kiebel, T. E. Nichols, & W. D. Penny (Eds.), Statistical parametric mapping: The analysis of functional brain images (pp. 193–210). London: Academic Press.
go back to reference Ivanoff, J., Branning, P., & Marois, R. (2009). Mapping the pathways of information processing from sensation to action in four distinct sensorimotor tasks. Human Brain Mapping, 30(12), 4167–4186.PubMedCrossRef Ivanoff, J., Branning, P., & Marois, R. (2009). Mapping the pathways of information processing from sensation to action in four distinct sensorimotor tasks. Human Brain Mapping, 30(12), 4167–4186.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1080–1094.PubMedCrossRef Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1080–1094.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 74(3), 255–267.CrossRef Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 74(3), 255–267.CrossRef
go back to reference MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.PubMedCrossRef MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Magen, H., & Cohen, A. (2010). Modularity beyond perception: Evidence from the PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 395–414.PubMedCrossRef Magen, H., & Cohen, A. (2010). Modularity beyond perception: Evidence from the PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 395–414.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 471–484.CrossRef McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 471–484.CrossRef
go back to reference Merriam, E. P., Colby, C. L., Thulborn, K. R., Luna, B., Olson, C. R., & Sweeney, J. A. (2001). Stimulus-response incompatibility activates cortex proximate to three eye fields. Neuroimage, 13(5), 794–800.PubMedCrossRef Merriam, E. P., Colby, C. L., Thulborn, K. R., Luna, B., Olson, C. R., & Sweeney, J. A. (2001). Stimulus-response incompatibility activates cortex proximate to three eye fields. Neuroimage, 13(5), 794–800.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance. 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104(1), 3–65.PubMedCrossRef Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance. 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104(1), 3–65.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance. 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749–791.CrossRef Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance. 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749–791.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., Kieras, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Schumacher, E. H., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E., et al. (1995). Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks. Acta Psychologica, 90, 163–190.CrossRef Meyer, D. E., Kieras, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Schumacher, E. H., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E., et al. (1995). Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks. Acta Psychologica, 90, 163–190.CrossRef
go back to reference Morimoto, H. M., Hirose, S., Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Asari, T., Yamashita, K., et al. (2008). On verbal/nonverbal modality dependence of left and right inferior prefrontal activation during performance of flanker interference task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2006–2014.PubMedCrossRef Morimoto, H. M., Hirose, S., Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Asari, T., Yamashita, K., et al. (2008). On verbal/nonverbal modality dependence of left and right inferior prefrontal activation during performance of flanker interference task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2006–2014.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nagel, I. E., Schumacher, E. H., Goebel, R., & D’Esposito, M. (2008). Functional MRI investigation of verbal selection mechanisms in lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 43(4), 801–807.PubMedCrossRef Nagel, I. E., Schumacher, E. H., Goebel, R., & D’Esposito, M. (2008). Functional MRI investigation of verbal selection mechanisms in lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 43(4), 801–807.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 826–842.PubMedCrossRef Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 826–842.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks—data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244.PubMedCrossRef Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks—data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155–189). Hove: Psychological Press. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155–189). Hove: Psychological Press.
go back to reference Ruthruff, E., Hazeltine, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006a). What causes residual dual-task interference after practice? Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 70(6), 494–503.CrossRef Ruthruff, E., Hazeltine, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006a). What causes residual dual-task interference after practice? Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 70(6), 494–503.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001a). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 3–21.PubMedCrossRef Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001a). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 3–21.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M., Whitsell, S., & Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 280–289.PubMedCrossRef Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M., Whitsell, S., & Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 280–289.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ruthruff, E., Pashler, H. E., & Klaassen, A. (2001b). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 73–80.CrossRef Ruthruff, E., Pashler, H. E., & Klaassen, A. (2001b). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 73–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. (2006b). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 70(2), 125–142.CrossRef Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. (2006b). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 70(2), 125–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A. J. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 733–746.PubMedCrossRef Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A. J. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 733–746.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Cole, M. W., & D’Esposito, M. (2007). Selection and maintenance of stimulus-response rules during preparation and performance of a spatial choice-reaction task. Brain Research, 1136(1), 77–87.PubMedCrossRef Schumacher, E. H., Cole, M. W., & D’Esposito, M. (2007). Selection and maintenance of stimulus-response rules during preparation and performance of a spatial choice-reaction task. Brain Research, 1136(1), 77–87.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., & D’Esposito, M. (2002). Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation. Human Brain Mapping, 17(3), 193–201.PubMedCrossRef Schumacher, E. H., & D’Esposito, M. (2002). Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation. Human Brain Mapping, 17(3), 193–201.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Elston, P. A., & D’Esposito, M. (2003). Neural evidence for representation-specific response selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1111–1121.PubMedCrossRef Schumacher, E. H., Elston, P. A., & D’Esposito, M. (2003). Neural evidence for representation-specific response selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1111–1121.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Hendricks, M. J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Sustained involvement of a frontal-parietal network for spatial response selection with practice of a spatial choice-reaction task. Neuropsychologia, 43(10), 1444–1455.PubMedCrossRef Schumacher, E. H., Hendricks, M. J., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Sustained involvement of a frontal-parietal network for spatial response selection with practice of a spatial choice-reaction task. Neuropsychologia, 43(10), 1444–1455.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., et al. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processing in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791–814.CrossRef Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., et al. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processing in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791–814.CrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., & Schwarb, H. (2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 138(2), 270–290.PubMedCrossRef Schumacher, E. H., & Schwarb, H. (2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 138(2), 270–290.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., et al. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101–108.PubMedCrossRef Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., et al. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101–108.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2009). Neural evidence of a role for spatial response selection in the learning of spatial sequences. Brain Research, 1247, 114–125.PubMedCrossRef Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2009). Neural evidence of a role for spatial response selection in the learning of spatial sequences. Brain Research, 1247, 114–125.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stelzel, C., Schumacher, E. H., Schubert, T., & D’Esposito, M. (2006). The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 70(6), 514–525.CrossRef Stelzel, C., Schumacher, E. H., Schubert, T., & D’Esposito, M. (2006). The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 70(6), 514–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2010). Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(4), 1075–1081.CrossRef Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2010). Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(4), 1075–1081.CrossRef
go back to reference Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Muller, K., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1184–1199.PubMedCrossRef Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Muller, K., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1184–1199.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wickens, C. D., & Liu, Y. (1988). Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors, 30(5), 599–616.PubMed Wickens, C. D., & Liu, Y. (1988). Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors, 30(5), 599–616.PubMed
go back to reference Wickens, C. D., Mountford, S. J., & Schreiner, W. (1981). Multiple resources, task-hemispheric integrity, and individual differences in time-sharing. Human Factors, 23(2), 211–229.PubMed Wickens, C. D., Mountford, S. J., & Schreiner, W. (1981). Multiple resources, task-hemispheric integrity, and individual differences in time-sharing. Human Factors, 23(2), 211–229.PubMed
go back to reference Worsley, K. J., & Friston, K. J. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited-again. Neuroimage, 2(3), 173–181.PubMedCrossRef Worsley, K. J., & Friston, K. J. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited-again. Neuroimage, 2(3), 173–181.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931–959.PubMedCrossRef Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931–959.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task
Auteurs
Eric H. Schumacher
Hillary Schwarb
Erin Lightman
Eliot Hazeltine
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2011
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0369-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2011

Psychological Research 6/2011 Naar de uitgave