Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Risk comprehension in individuals at increased familial risk of cancer is suboptimal and little is known about how risk is understood and managed by at-risk individuals who do not undergo genetic testing. We qualitatively studied these issues in 36 unaffected women from high-risk breast cancer families, including both women who had and had not undergone genetic testing. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and data analysis was guided by Grounded Theory. Risk comprehension and risk management were largely influenced by the individual’s experience of coming from a high-risk family, with both tested and untested women relying heavily on their intuition. Although women’s cognitive understanding of their risk appeared generally accurate, this objective risk information was considered of secondary value. The findings could be used to guide the development and delivery of information about risk and risk management to genetically tested and untested individuals at increased risk of hereditary cancer.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Allan, G. (2003). A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,2, 1–10.
Bakos, A. D., Hutson, S. P., Loud, J. T., Peters, J. A., Giusti, R. M., & Greene, M. H. (2008). BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: A qualitative study of the BRCA-negative experience. Health Expectations,11, 220–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00494.xPubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1990). Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review,10, 3–47. CrossRef
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science,11, 164–169. CrossRef
Butow, P., Lobb, E. A., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., & Tucker, K. M. (2003). Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: A systematic review. Medical Journal of Australia,178, 77–81. PubMed
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 249–291). London: Sage.
Dawson, S.-J., Price, M. A., Jenkins, M. A., McKinley, J. M., Butow, P. N., McLachlan, S.-A., et al. (2008). Cancer risk management practices of noncarriers within BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology,26, 225–232. doi: 10.1200/jco.2007.11.0262CrossRefPubMed
Dieng, M., Watts, C. G., Kasparian, N. A., Morton, R. L., Mann, G. J., & Cust, A. E. (2014). Improving subjective perception of personal cancer risk: Systematic review and meta-analysis of educational interventions for people with cancer or at high risk of cancer. Psycho-Oncology,23, 613–625. doi: 10.1002/pon.3476CrossRefPubMed
Evers-Kiebooms, G., Welkenhuysen, M., Claes, E., Decruyenaere, M., & Denayer, L. (2000). The psychological complexity of predictive testing for late onset neurogenetic diseases and hereditary cancers: Implications for multidisciplinary counselling and for genetic education. Social Science and Medicine,51, 831–841. CrossRefPubMed
Finlay, E., Stopfer, J. E., Burlingame, E., Evans, K. G., Nathanson, K. L., Weber, B. L., et al. (2008). Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genetic Testing,12, 81–91. doi: 10.1089/gte.2007.0037PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Hallowell, N., Green, J. M., Statham, H., Murton, F., & Richards, M. P. M. (1997). Recall of numerical risk estimates and counsellees’ perceptions of the importance of risk information following genetic counselling for breast and ovarian cancer. Psychology, Health & Medicine,2, 149–159. doi: 10.1080/13548509708400572CrossRef
Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Miller, D. G., & Osborne, M. P. (1995). Does anxiety interfere with adherence to screening behaviors in women at genetic risk for breast-cancer? Psychosomatics,36, 176.
Keogh, L. A., McClaren, B. J., Apicella, C., Hopper, J. L., & Australian Breast Cancer Family Study. (2011). How do women at increased, but unexplained, familial risk of breast cancer perceive and manage their risk? A qualitative interview study. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice,9, 7. doi: 10.1186/1897-4287-9-7PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Lau, C., & Suthers, G. (2011). BRCA testing for familial breast cancer. Australian Prescriber,34, 49–51.
McInerney-Leo, A., Hadley, D., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T. R., Struewing, J. P., & Biesecker, B. B. (2006). BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families III: Risk perception and screening. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A,140A, 2198–2206. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31432CrossRef
NBOCC. (2010). Advice about familial aspects of breast cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer: A guide for health professionals. Sydney: National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre.
Persson, E., Lindholm, E., Berndtsson, I., Lundstam, U., Hultén, L., & Carlsson, E. (2012). Experiences of living with increased risk of developing colorectal and gynaecological cancer in individuals with no identified gene mutation. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,26, 20–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00898.xCrossRefPubMed
Pijpe, A., Andrieu, N., Easton, D. F., Kesminiene, A., Cardis, E., Nogues, C., et al. (2012). Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: Retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK). British Medical Journal,345, e5660. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5660PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Price, M. A., Tennant, C. C., Butow, P. N., Smith, R. C., Kennedy, S. J., Kossoff, M. B., et al. (2001). The role of psychosocial factors in the development of breast carcinoma: Part II—Life event stressors, social support, defense style, and emotional control and their interactions. Cancer,91, 686–697. CrossRefPubMed
Renner, B. (2004). Biased reasoning: Adaptive responses to health risk feedback. Personality and Psychological Bulletin,30, 384–396. CrossRef
Siegel, R., DeSantis, C., & Jemal, A. (2014). Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,64, 104–117. doi: 10.3322/caac.21220
Sivell, S., Elwyn, G., Gaff, C., Clarke, A., Iredale, R., Shaw, C., et al. (2008). How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: Systematic review. Journal of Genetic Counseling,17, 30–63. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9132-1CrossRefPubMed
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage.
Vos, J., Menko, F., Jansen, A. M., van Asperen, C. J., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Tibben, A. (2011). A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: A retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives. Familial Cancer,10, 87–96. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9385-yPubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
- Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk
Phyllis N. Butow
Melanie A. Price
kConFab Psychosocial Group on behalf of the kConFab Investigators
- Springer US