Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

19-11-2018 | Commentary

Interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures through a philosophical lens

Auteurs: Jae Yung Kwon, Sally Thorne, Richard Sawatzky

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

As patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) increasingly become key outcome indicators in health care, there has been growing concern about the potential negative consequences that could result when interpretations are being made to inform clinical and policy decisions. Therefore, we explored theoretical issues, assumptions, and consequences of using PROMs from a philosophical point of view.

Methods

Our analysis of the literature was informed by Gadamerian hermeneutics, which emphasizes the dialectical processes that occur during interpretation, to provide insights as to how different users interpret and use standardized questions about health and quality of life.

Results

We structured our consideration according to three tenets of using PROMs: (1) the use of PROMs involves the interpretation of contextual elements; (2) interpretation of PROMs is an ongoing dialectical interaction; and (3) the use of PROMs involves openness and reflexivity. These findings suggest that hermeneutics provides a useful approach to examining the complexities of measuring patient-reported outcomes by attending to the perspectives of different users (e.g., patients, clinicians, administrators, and policy-makers) at the micro-, meso-, and macro-levels and the broader socio-historical and economic situation.

Conclusion

Because PROMs can have different meanings and are used for different purposes, we propose that hermeneutics be used as a lens to ask reflexive questions about the problems of measurement and open a pluralistic dialogue with respect to the way we use PROMs and the interpretations we make of the findings that derive from our studies.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). Washington (DC): American Council on Education. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). Washington (DC): American Council on Education.
2.
go back to reference Sawatzky, R., Chan, E. K. H., Zumbo, B. D., Ahmed, S., Bartlett, S. J., Bingham, C. O., … Lix, L. M. (2017). Montreal accord on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) use series-paper 7: Modern perspectives of measurement validation emphasize justification of inferences based on patient reported outcome scores. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.002.CrossRefPubMed Sawatzky, R., Chan, E. K. H., Zumbo, B. D., Ahmed, S., Bartlett, S. J., Bingham, C. O., … Lix, L. M. (2017). Montreal accord on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) use series-paper 7: Modern perspectives of measurement validation emphasize justification of inferences based on patient reported outcome scores. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 154–159. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2016.​12.​002.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S., Gibbons, E., Wright, J., Valderas, J. M., Meads, D., & Black, N. (2018). How do aggregated patient-reported outcome measures data stimulate health care improvement? A realist synthesis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 23(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819617740925.CrossRef Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S., Gibbons, E., Wright, J., Valderas, J. M., Meads, D., & Black, N. (2018). How do aggregated patient-reported outcome measures data stimulate health care improvement? A realist synthesis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 23(1), 57–65. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1355819617740925​.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks: Sage Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks: Sage
8.
go back to reference Gadamer, H. G. (1998). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum. Gadamer, H. G. (1998). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.
13.
14.
go back to reference Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRef Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 48(8), 977–988.CrossRef Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 48(8), 977–988.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference McClimans, L. (2013). The role of measurement in establishing evidence. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(5), 520–538.CrossRefPubMed McClimans, L. (2013). The role of measurement in establishing evidence. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(5), 520–538.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kane, M. (2013). The argument-based approach to validation. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 448–457. Kane, M. (2013). The argument-based approach to validation. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 448–457.
32.
go back to reference Dostal, R. (2010). The science of philology and the discipline of hermeneutics: Gadamer’s understanding. Internationales Jahrbuch für Hermeneutik, 53–62. Dostal, R. (2010). The science of philology and the discipline of hermeneutics: Gadamer’s understanding. Internationales Jahrbuch für Hermeneutik, 53–62.
Metagegevens
Titel
Interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures through a philosophical lens
Auteurs
Jae Yung Kwon
Sally Thorne
Richard Sawatzky
Publicatiedatum
19-11-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2051-9