Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness 8/2022

05-07-2022 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale-Short Form Development Using Rasch Analyses

Auteurs: Steven D. Pratscher, Danielle L. Oyler, B. Ann Bettencourt, Oleg N. Medvedev

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 8/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objectives

The Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale (IMS) was recently developed to assess the qualities of mindfulness relevant to interpersonal interactions. The objective of the current study was to create a valid and reliable short-form version from the existing 27-item IMS.

Methods

Rasch modeling methods were used to evaluate a 17-item version and 13-item version of the IMS-short form (IMS-SF) in a sample of 584 participants (sample A). Items from the IMS were deleted with the goals to maintain the theoretical representation of the construct and to retain at least three items from each subscale. An independent sample of 503 participants (sample B) was used to examine the robustness of each IMS-SF.

Results

In both samples, the 17-item and 13-item versions of the IMS-SF met the expectations of the unidimensional Rasch model, were invariant across demographic factors, and had acceptable reliability (PSI = 0.74–0.81). The 17-item version demonstrated better reliability and coverage of the construct in both samples compared to the 13-item version. Nevertheless, the 13-item IMS-SF maintained satisfactory psychometric properties to be recommended as a briefer alternative for most research uses. Zero-order correlations and partial correlations, controlling for trait mindfulness, supported the construct validity of each IMS-SF. The accuracy of measurement of the IMS-SF can be enhanced by transforming ordinal responses into interval-level data using the included ordinal-to-interval conversion tables.

Conclusions

Both the 17-item and 13-item IMS-SF can be used to efficiently measure overall levels of interpersonal mindfulness.
Literatuur
go back to reference Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573.CrossRef Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573.CrossRef
go back to reference Andrich, D., Humphry, S. M., & Marais, I. (2012). Quantifying local, response dependence between two polytomous items using the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(4), 309–324.CrossRef Andrich, D., Humphry, S. M., & Marais, I. (2012). Quantifying local, response dependence between two polytomous items using the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(4), 309–324.CrossRef
go back to reference Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM2030: Rasch unidimensional models for measurement. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory, 3, 1–10. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM2030: Rasch unidimensional models for measurement. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory, 3, 1–10.
go back to reference Ardito, R. B., & Rabellino, D. (2011). Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ardito, R. B., & Rabellino, D. (2011). Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.PubMedCrossRef Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Baminiwatta, A., & Solangaarachchi, I. (2021). Trends and developments in mindfulness research over 55 years: A bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Web of Science. Mindfulness, 12(9), 2099–2116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Baminiwatta, A., & Solangaarachchi, I. (2021). Trends and developments in mindfulness research over 55 years: A bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Web of Science. Mindfulness, 12(9), 2099–2116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Barnes, S., Brown, K. W., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W. K., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482–500.PubMedCrossRef Barnes, S., Brown, K. W., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W. K., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482–500.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Beach, M. C., Roter, D., Korthuis, P. T., Epstein, R. M., Sharp, V., Ratanawongsa, N., Cohn, J., Eggly, S., Sankar, A., & Moore, R. D. (2013). A multicenter study of physician mindfulness and health care quality. The Annals of Family Medicine, 11(5), 421–428.PubMedCrossRef Beach, M. C., Roter, D., Korthuis, P. T., Epstein, R. M., Sharp, V., Ratanawongsa, N., Cohn, J., Eggly, S., Sankar, A., & Moore, R. D. (2013). A multicenter study of physician mindfulness and health care quality. The Annals of Family Medicine, 11(5), 421–428.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077CrossRef Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​clipsy.​bph077CrossRef
go back to reference Bodenmann, G., Schär, M., & Gmelch, S. (2008). Multidimensional stress questionnaire for couples (MDS-Q). Unpublished questionnaire. Bodenmann, G., Schär, M., & Gmelch, S. (2008). Multidimensional stress questionnaire for couples (MDS-Q). Unpublished questionnaire.
go back to reference Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 175–183.CrossRef Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 175–183.CrossRef
go back to reference Carpenter, J. K., Conroy, K., Gomez, A. F., Curren, L. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2019). The relationship between trait mindfulness and affective symptoms: A meta-analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Clinical Psychology Review, 74, 101785.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Carpenter, J. K., Conroy, K., Gomez, A. F., Curren, L. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2019). The relationship between trait mindfulness and affective symptoms: A meta-analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Clinical Psychology Review, 74, 101785.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Chalmers, R. A., Pratscher, S. D., Bettencourt, B. A., & Medvedev, O. N. (2021). Applying generalizability theory to differentiate between trait and state in the Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale (IMS). Mindfulness, 12(3), 613–622.CrossRef Chalmers, R. A., Pratscher, S. D., Bettencourt, B. A., & Medvedev, O. N. (2021). Applying generalizability theory to differentiate between trait and state in the Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale (IMS). Mindfulness, 12(3), 613–622.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheung, J. H., Burns, D. K., Sinclair, R. R., & Sliter, M. (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk in organizational psychology: An evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 347–361.CrossRef Cheung, J. H., Burns, D. K., Sinclair, R. R., & Sliter, M. (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk in organizational psychology: An evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 347–361.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q 3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178–194.PubMedCrossRef Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q 3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178–194.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1994). Perceived stress scale. Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists, 10(2), 1–2. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1994). Perceived stress scale. Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists, 10(2), 1–2.
go back to reference Cole, J. C., Rabin, A. S., Smith, T. L., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form. Psychological Assessment, 16(4), 360.PubMedCrossRef Cole, J. C., Rabin, A. S., Smith, T. L., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form. Psychological Assessment, 16(4), 360.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.PubMedCrossRef Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Donald, J. N., Sahdra, B. K., Van Zanden, B., Duineveld, J. J., Atkins, P. W., Marshall, S. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). Does your mindfulness benefit others? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the link between mindfulness and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 101–125.PubMedCrossRef Donald, J. N., Sahdra, B. K., Van Zanden, B., Duineveld, J. J., Atkins, P. W., Marshall, S. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). Does your mindfulness benefit others? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the link between mindfulness and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 101–125.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Duncan, L. G. (2007). Assessment of mindful parenting among parents of early adolescents: Development and validation of the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting scale. [Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University]. Duncan, L. G. (2007). Assessment of mindful parenting among parents of early adolescents: Development and validation of the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting scale. [Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University].
go back to reference Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., Bodenmann, G., Schneider, H., & Bradbury, T. (2015). Stress from daily hassles in couples: Its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12073CrossRefPubMed Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., Bodenmann, G., Schneider, H., & Bradbury, T. (2015). Stress from daily hassles in couples: Its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 221–235. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jmft.​12073CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022898CrossRefPubMed Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615–625. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0022898CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory (Vol. 2). Sage. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory (Vol. 2). Sage.
go back to reference Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137–142.CrossRef Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Hick, S. F., & Bien, T. (2010). Mindfulness and the therapeutic relationship. Guilford Press. Hick, S. F., & Bien, T. (2010). Mindfulness and the therapeutic relationship. Guilford Press.
go back to reference House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241(4865), 540–545.PubMedCrossRef House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241(4865), 540–545.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hulbert-Williams, L., Nicholls, W., Joy, J., & Hulbert-Williams, N. (2014). Initial validation of the mindful eating scale. Mindfulness, 5(6), 719–729.CrossRef Hulbert-Williams, L., Nicholls, W., Joy, J., & Hulbert-Williams, N. (2014). Initial validation of the mindful eating scale. Mindfulness, 5(6), 719–729.CrossRef
go back to reference Kennedy, R., Clifford, S., Burleigh, T., Waggoner, P. D., Jewell, R., & Winter, N. J. (2020). The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(4), 614–629.CrossRef Kennedy, R., Clifford, S., Burleigh, T., Waggoner, P. D., Jewell, R., & Winter, N. J. (2020). The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(4), 614–629.CrossRef
go back to reference Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503.PubMedCrossRef Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kimmes, J. G., Jaurequi, M. E., May, R. W., Srivastava, S., & Fincham, F. D. (2018). Mindfulness in the context of romantic relationships: Initial development and validation of the relationship mindfulness measure. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(4), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12296CrossRefPubMed Kimmes, J. G., Jaurequi, M. E., May, R. W., Srivastava, S., & Fincham, F. D. (2018). Mindfulness in the context of romantic relationships: Initial development and validation of the relationship mindfulness measure. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(4), 575–589. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jmft.​12296CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Leavitt, C. E., Lefkowitz, E. S., & Waterman, E. A. (2019). The role of sexual mindfulness in sexual wellbeing, relational wellbeing, and self-esteem. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 45(6), 497–509.CrossRef Leavitt, C. E., Lefkowitz, E. S., & Waterman, E. A. (2019). The role of sexual mindfulness in sexual wellbeing, relational wellbeing, and self-esteem. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 45(6), 497–509.CrossRef
go back to reference Leung, Y.-Y., Png, M.-E., Conaghan, P., & Tennant, A. (2014). A systematic literature review on the application of Rasch analysis in musculoskeletal disease—a special interest group report of OMERACT 11. The Journal of Rheumatology, 41(1), 159–164.PubMedCrossRef Leung, Y.-Y., Png, M.-E., Conaghan, P., & Tennant, A. (2014). A systematic literature review on the application of Rasch analysis in musculoskeletal disease—a special interest group report of OMERACT 11. The Journal of Rheumatology, 41(1), 159–164.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Ahlborg, G., & Tennant, A. (2013). Construct validity of the psychological general well being index (PGWBI) in a sample of patients undergoing treatment for stress-related exhaustion: A Rasch analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 1–9.CrossRef Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Ahlborg, G., & Tennant, A. (2013). Construct validity of the psychological general well being index (PGWBI) in a sample of patients undergoing treatment for stress-related exhaustion: A Rasch analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 1–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.CrossRef Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174.CrossRef Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Medvedev, O. N., Krägeloh, C. U., Narayanan, A., & Siegert, R. J. (2017b). Measuring mindfulness: Applying generalizability theory to distinguish between state and trait. Mindfulness, 8(4), 1036–1046.CrossRef Medvedev, O. N., Krägeloh, C. U., Narayanan, A., & Siegert, R. J. (2017b). Measuring mindfulness: Applying generalizability theory to distinguish between state and trait. Mindfulness, 8(4), 1036–1046.CrossRef
go back to reference Medvedev, O. N., Titkova, E. A., Siegert, R. J., Hwang, Y.-S., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2018b). Evaluating short versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Mindfulness, 9(5), 1411–1422.CrossRef Medvedev, O. N., Titkova, E. A., Siegert, R. J., Hwang, Y.-S., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2018b). Evaluating short versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Mindfulness, 9(5), 1411–1422.CrossRef
go back to reference Mesmer-Magnus, J., Manapragada, A., Viswesvaran, C., & Allen, J. W. (2017). Trait mindfulness at work: A meta-analysis of the personal and professional correlates of trait mindfulness. Human Performance, 30(2–3), 79–98.CrossRef Mesmer-Magnus, J., Manapragada, A., Viswesvaran, C., & Allen, J. W. (2017). Trait mindfulness at work: A meta-analysis of the personal and professional correlates of trait mindfulness. Human Performance, 30(2–3), 79–98.CrossRef
go back to reference Oyler, D. L., Price-Blackshear, M. A., Pratscher, S. D., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2021). Mindfulness and intergroup bias: A systematic review. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 1107–1138.CrossRef Oyler, D. L., Price-Blackshear, M. A., Pratscher, S. D., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2021). Mindfulness and intergroup bias: A systematic review. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 1107–1138.CrossRef
go back to reference Pinto, R. Z., Ferreira, M. L., Oliveira, V. C., Franco, M. R., Adams, R., Maher, C. G., & Ferreira, P. H. (2012). Patient-centred communication is associated with positive therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 58(2), 77–87.PubMedCrossRef Pinto, R. Z., Ferreira, M. L., Oliveira, V. C., Franco, M. R., Adams, R., Maher, C. G., & Ferreira, P. H. (2012). Patient-centred communication is associated with positive therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 58(2), 77–87.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pratscher, S. D., Rose, A. J., Markovitz, L., & Bettencourt, A. (2018). Interpersonal mindfulness: Investigating mindfulness in interpersonal interactions, co-rumination, and friendship quality. Mindfulness, 9(4), 1206–1215.CrossRef Pratscher, S. D., Rose, A. J., Markovitz, L., & Bettencourt, A. (2018). Interpersonal mindfulness: Investigating mindfulness in interpersonal interactions, co-rumination, and friendship quality. Mindfulness, 9(4), 1206–1215.CrossRef
go back to reference Pratscher, S. D., Wood, P. K., King, L. A., & Bettencourt, B. (2019). Interpersonal mindfulness: Scale development and initial construct validation. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1044–1061.CrossRef Pratscher, S. D., Wood, P. K., King, L. A., & Bettencourt, B. (2019). Interpersonal mindfulness: Scale development and initial construct validation. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1044–1061.CrossRef
go back to reference Price-Blackshear, M. A., Pratscher, S. D., Oyler, D. L., Armer, J. M., Cheng, A.-L., Cheng, M. X., Records, K., Udmuangpia, T., Carson, J. W., & Ann Bettencourt, B. (2020). Online couples mindfulness-based intervention for young breast cancer survivors and their partners: A randomized-control trial. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 38(5), 592–611.PubMedCrossRef Price-Blackshear, M. A., Pratscher, S. D., Oyler, D. L., Armer, J. M., Cheng, A.-L., Cheng, M. X., Records, K., Udmuangpia, T., Carson, J. W., & Ann Bettencourt, B. (2020). Online couples mindfulness-based intervention for young breast cancer survivors and their partners: A randomized-control trial. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 38(5), 592–611.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Quinn-Nilas, C. (2020). Self-reported trait mindfulness and couples’ relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 11(4), 835–848.CrossRef Quinn-Nilas, C. (2020). Self-reported trait mindfulness and couples’ relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 11(4), 835–848.CrossRef
go back to reference Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 105–115.PubMedCrossRef Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 105–115.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 96–106.PubMedCrossRef Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 96–106.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Razzaque, R., Okoro, E., & Wood, L. (2015). Mindfulness in Clinician Therapeutic Relationships. Mindfulness, 6(2), 170–174.CrossRef Razzaque, R., Okoro, E., & Wood, L. (2015). Mindfulness in Clinician Therapeutic Relationships. Mindfulness, 6(2), 170–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Reis, H. T. (2006). The Perceived Responsiveness Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, NY. Reis, H. T. (2006). The Perceived Responsiveness Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, NY.
go back to reference Reis, H. T., Lemay, E. P., Jr., & Finkenauer, C. (2017). Toward understanding understanding: The importance of feeling understood in relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), e12308.CrossRef Reis, H. T., Lemay, E. P., Jr., & Finkenauer, C. (2017). Toward understanding understanding: The importance of feeling understood in relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), e12308.CrossRef
go back to reference Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.PubMedCrossRef Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2000). Interpersonal flourishing: A positive health agenda for the new millennium. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 30–44.CrossRef Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2000). Interpersonal flourishing: A positive health agenda for the new millennium. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 30–44.CrossRef
go back to reference Sala, M., Rochefort, C., Lui, P. P., & Baldwin, A. S. (2020). Trait mindfulness and health behaviours: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 14(3), 345–393.PubMedCrossRef Sala, M., Rochefort, C., Lui, P. P., & Baldwin, A. S. (2020). Trait mindfulness and health behaviours: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 14(3), 345–393.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Scheepers, R. A., Emke, H., Epstein, R. M., & Lombarts, K. M. (2020). The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on doctors’ well-being and performance: A systematic review. Medical Education, 54(2), 138–149.PubMedCrossRef Scheepers, R. A., Emke, H., Epstein, R. M., & Lombarts, K. M. (2020). The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on doctors’ well-being and performance: A systematic review. Medical Education, 54(2), 138–149.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57(8), 1358–1362.CrossRef Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57(8), 1358–1362.CrossRef
go back to reference Tomlinson, E. R., Yousaf, O., Vittersø, A. D., & Jones, L. (2018). Dispositional mindfulness and psychological health: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 9(1), 23–43.PubMedCrossRef Tomlinson, E. R., Yousaf, O., Vittersø, A. D., & Jones, L. (2018). Dispositional mindfulness and psychological health: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 9(1), 23–43.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185–201.CrossRef Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185–201.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, W.-C., & Wilson, M. (2005). The Rasch testlet model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 126–149.CrossRef Wang, W.-C., & Wilson, M. (2005). The Rasch testlet model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 126–149.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale-Short Form Development Using Rasch Analyses
Auteurs
Steven D. Pratscher
Danielle L. Oyler
B. Ann Bettencourt
Oleg N. Medvedev
Publicatiedatum
05-07-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 8/2022
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01937-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2022

Mindfulness 8/2022 Naar de uitgave