Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2010

Internal Consistencies and Structural Analysis of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 Facet Subscales in Chinese Population

Auteurs: Li Wang, Jianxin Zhang, Zhanbiao Shi, Mingjie Zhou, Zhongquan Li

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 1/2010

Abstract

Using the normative data set of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 of the People’s Republic of China, this study examined the psychometric properties of the Personality Psychopathology Five facet subscales recently developed by Arnau et al. (2005). The internal consistency reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the Psy-5 were found to be unsatisfactory. Results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that both item-to-facet factor structure (except the PSYC domain facets subscales) and facet-to-domain factor structure fit the data poorly. These findings suggested that the PSY-5 facet subscales may not be reliable and valid in population independent of those used to derive them. Thus, the utility of these facet subscales in clinical and research settings is premature at least for Chinese people at the present time.

vorige artikel Development and Evaluation of the Parental Beliefs about Anxiety Questionnaire

Arnau, R. C., Handel, R. W., & Archer, R. P. (2005). Principal components analyses of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales identification of facet subscales. Assessment, 12, 186–198.CrossRefPubMed

Bagby, R. M., Costa, P. T., Widiger, T. A., Ryder, A. G., & Marshall, M. B. (2005). DSM-IV personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: A multi-method examination of domain and facet level predictions. European Journal of Personality, 19, 1–18.CrossRef

Bagby, R. M., Ryder, A. G., Ben-Dat, D., Bacchiochi, J., & Parker, J. D. A. (2002). Validation of the dimensional factor structure of the Personality Psychopathology Five in clinical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, 304–316.CrossRefPubMed

Bagby, R. M., Sellbom, M., Costa, P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). Predicting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model of personality and the personality psychopathology five. Personality and Mental Health, 2, 55–69.CrossRef

Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMPI-2: Manual for the administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cheung, F. M., Song, W. Z., & Zhang, J. X. (1991). The Chinese MMPI-2: Research and applications in Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of China. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2: Research and clinical applications (pp. 137–161). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.CrossRef

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRef

Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104–114.CrossRef

Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Graham, J. G. (2002). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) scales. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192–211.CrossRef

MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107–120.CrossRef

McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566.CrossRef

Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the Five-Factor Model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.CrossRefPubMed

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS, SAS, and MATLAB programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396–402.PubMed

Petroskey, L. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Stafford, K. P. (2003). Correlates of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 (MMPI-2) Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) scales in a forensic assessment setting. Assessment, 10, 393–399.CrossRefPubMed

Quilty, L. C., & Bagby, R. M. (2007). Psychometric and structural analysisof the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) facet subscales. Assessment, 14, 375–384.CrossRefPubMed

Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., Graham, J. R., & Schenk, P. W. (2006). Incremental validity of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales in assessing self-reported personality disorder criteria. Assessment, 13, 178–186.CrossRefPubMed

Ullman, J. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp. 708–819). New York: HarperCollins.

Titel: Internal Consistencies and Structural Analysis of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 Facet Subscales in Chinese Population
Auteurs: Li Wang
Jianxin Zhang
Zhanbiao Shi
Mingjie Zhou
Zhongquan Li
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2010
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9140-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2010

Development and Evaluation of the Parental Beliefs about Anxiety Questionnaire

Assessment of Behavior Problems in Childhood and Adolescence as Predictors of Early Adult Depression

Electronic Diaries: A Feasible Method of Assessing Emotional Experiences in Youth?

The Factor Structure of Effortful Control and Measurement Invariance Across Ethnicity and Sex in a High-Risk Sample

Patterns of Emotional Reactivity and Regulation in Children with Anxiety Disorders

Advances, Problems, and Challenges in the Study of Emotion Regulation: A Commentary