Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Discrepancies Between Academic Achievement and ...

volgende artikel Erratum to: Intention Perception in High Functi...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-08-2011 | Original Paper | Uitgave 8/2011

Intention Perception in High Functioning People with Autism Spectrum Disorders Using Animacy Displays Derived from Human Actions

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > Uitgave 8/2011

Auteurs:: Phil McAleer, Jim W. Kay, Frank E. Pollick, M. D. Rutherford

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Authors Phil McAleer and M. D. Rutherford contributed equally to this manuscript.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1145-1

Abstract

The perception of intent in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) often relies on synthetic animacy displays. This study tests intention perception in ASD via animacy stimuli derived from human motion. Using a forced choice task, 28 participants (14 ASDs; 14 age and verbal-I.Q. matched controls) categorized displays of Chasing, Fighting, Flirting, Following, Guarding and Playing, from two viewpoints (side, overhead) in both animacy and full video displays. Detailed analysis revealed no differences between populations in accuracy, or response patterns. Collapsing across groups revealed Following and Video displays to be most accurately perceived. The stimuli and intentions used are compared to those of previous studies, and the implication of our results on the understanding of Theory of Mind in ASD is discussed.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Abell, F., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2000). Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development, 15, 1–16. CrossRef

Abell, F., Krams, M., Ashburner, J., Passingham, R., Friston, K., Frackowiak, R., et al. (1999). The neuroanatomy of autism: a voxel-based whole brain analysis of structural scans. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 10(8), 1647–1651.

Asperger, H. (1944). Die autistischen Psychopathen im Kindesalter. In U. Frith (Ed.), Autism and Asperger Syndrome Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten (pp. 76–136). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bachevalier, J. (1991). An animal model for childhood autism: Memory loss and socioemotional disturbances following neonatal damage to the limbic system in monkeys. In C. A. Tamminga & S. C. Schulz (Eds.), Advances in neuropsychiatry and psychopharmacology (Vol. 1) (pp. 129–140). New York: Raven Press.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248–254. PubMedCrossRef

Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference. London, UK: Penguin.

Baron-Cohen, S., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Autism: A window onto the development of the social analytic brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 109–126. PubMedCrossRef

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46. PubMedCrossRef

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Griffin, R., Lawson, J., & Hill, J. (2002). The exact mind: Empathising and systemising in autism spectrum conditions. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of development. Oxford: Blackwell.

Barrett, H. C., Todd, P. M., Miller, G. F., & Blythe, P. W. (2005). Accurate judgements of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 26, 313–331. CrossRef

Bassili, J. N. (1976). Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(6), 680–685. CrossRef

Bauman, M. L., & Kemper, T. L. (1994). Neuroanatomic observations of the brain in autism. In M. L. Bauman & T. L. Kemper (Eds.), The neurobiology of autism (pp. 119–145). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

Berry, D. S., Misovich, S. J., Kean, K. J., & Baron, R. M. (1992). Effects of disruption of structure and motion on perception of social causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 237–238. CrossRef

Blake, R., Turner, L. M., Smoski, M. J., Pozdol, S. L., & Stone, W. L. (2003). Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychological Science, 14, 151–157. PubMedCrossRef

Blakemore, S. J., Boyer, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Meltzoff, A., Segebarth, C., & Decety, J. (2003). The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 837–844. PubMedCrossRef

Bloom, P., & Veres, C. (1999). The perceived intentionality of groups. Cognition, 71, B1–B9. PubMedCrossRef

Blythe, P. W., Todd, P. M., & Miller, G. F. (1999). How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions in simple Heuristics that make us smart. In Gigerenzer, et al. (Eds.), Simple Heuristics that make us smart (pp. 257–285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bowler, D. M., & Thommen, E. (2000). Attribution of mechanical and social causality to animated displays by children with autism. Autism, 4, 147–171. CrossRef

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. PubMedCrossRef

Brothers, L. (1990). The social brain: A project for integrating primate behaviour and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts in Neuroscience, 1, 27–51.

Castelli, F. (2006). The Valley task: Understanding intention from goal-directed motion in typical development and autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 655–668. CrossRef

Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger Syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125, 1839–1849. PubMedCrossRef

Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage, 12, 314–325. PubMedCrossRef

Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (2007). Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Edgington, E. S., & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization tests. Boca Raton. USA: CRC Press.

Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ ² from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94. CrossRef

Freitag, C. M., Konrad, C., Häberlein, M., Kleser, C., von Gontard, A., Reith, W., et al. (2008). Perception of biological motion in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1480–1494. PubMedCrossRef

Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.

Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2001). The biological basis of social interaction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 151–155. CrossRef

Gao, T., Newman, G. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 154–179. PubMedCrossRef

Gergely, G., Nadasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Biro, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165–193. PubMedCrossRef

Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(1), 5–25. CrossRef

Hashimoto, H. (1966). A phenomenal analysis of social perception. Journal of Child Development, 2, 1–16.

Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259. CrossRef

Herrington, J. D., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Singh, K. D., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M., et al. (2007). The role of MT+/V5 during biological motion perception in Asperger Syndrome: An fMRI study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 14–27. CrossRef

Hubert, B., Wicker, B., Moore, D. G., Monfardini, E., Duverger, H., Da Fonséca, D., et al. (2007). Brief report: Recognition of emotional and non-emotional biological motion in individuals with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1386–1392. PubMedCrossRef

Johnson, C. R., & Rakison, D. H. (2006). Early categorization of animate/inanimate concepts in young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 18(2), 73–89. CrossRef

Just, M. A., Cherkassky, V. L., Keller, T. A., Kana, R. K., & Minshew, N. J. (2007). Functional and anatomical cortical underconnectivity in autism: Evidence from an fMRI study of an executive function task and corpus callosum morphometry. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 951–961. PubMedCrossRef

Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.

Klein, A. M., Zwickel, J., Prinz, W., & Frith, U. (2009). Animated triangles: An eye tracking investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(6), 1189–1197. CrossRef

Klin, A. (2000). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The Social Attribution Task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 831–846. CrossRef

Kuhlmeier, V. A., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14, 402–408. PubMedCrossRef

Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205–223. PubMedCrossRef

Lord, C., Rutter, M., & LeCouteur, A. (1994). Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 659–685. PubMedCrossRef

McAleer, P., & Pollick, F. E. (2008). Understanding intention from minimal displays of human activity. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 830–839. PubMedCrossRef

McKay, L. S., McAleer, P., Simmons, D. R., Marjoram, D., Piggot, J. & Pollick, F. P. (2010) Distinct configural processing networks reveal differences in biological motion processing in ASD. Organization for Human Brain Mapping—Annual Meeting, Barcelona, June 6-10.

Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. Oxford: Basic Books.

Moore, D. G., Hobson, R. P., & Lee, A. (1997). Components of person perception: An investigation with autistic, non-autistic retarded and typically developing children and adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 401–423. CrossRef

Parron, C., Da Fonseca, D., Santos, A., Moore, D. G., Monfardini, E., & Deruelle, C. (2008). Recognition of biological motion in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Autism, 12(3), 261–264. PubMedCrossRef

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. PubMedCrossRef

Rime, B. (1985). The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement. Motivation and Emotion, 9, 241–260. CrossRef

Rutherford, M. D., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (2006). The perception of animacy in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 893–992. CrossRef

Simmons, D. R., Robertson, A. E., McKay, L. S., Toal, E., McAleer, P., & Pollick, F. E. (2009). Vision in autism spectrum disorders. Vision Research, 49, 2705–2739. PubMedCrossRef

Szego, P., & Rutherford, M. D. (2007). Actual and illusory differences in constant speed influence the perception of animacy similarly. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–7. PubMedCrossRef

Szego, P., & Rutherford, M. D. (2008). Dissociating the perception of speed and the perception of animacy: A functional approach. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(5), 335–342. CrossRef

Westfall, P. H., & Young, S. S. (1989). p-value adjustment for multiple tests in multivariate binomial models. Journal of American Statistical Association, 84, 780. CrossRef

Zacks, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28, 979–1008. CrossRef

Titel: Intention Perception in High Functioning People with Autism Spectrum Disorders Using Animacy Displays Derived from Human Actions
Auteurs:: Phil McAleer
Jim W. Kay
Frank E. Pollick
M. D. Rutherford
Publicatiedatum: 01-08-2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1130-8
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Uitgave 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2011

Brief Report: Broader Autism Phenotype Predicts Spontaneous Reciprocity of Direct Gaze

Anterior EEG Asymmetry and the Modifier Model of Autism

Delineation of Behavioral Phenotypes in Genetic Syndromes: Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder, Affect and Hyperactivity

The Socially Included Child: A Parent’s Guide to Successful Playdates, Recreation, and Family Events for Children with Autism

Lee A. Wilkinson: A Best Practice Guide to Assessment and Intervention for Autism and Asperger Syndrome in Schools

Finnish Prenatal Study of Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorders (FIPS-A): Overview and Design