Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2009

01-12-2009 | Editorial

Intellectual property rights and good research practice

Auteurs: Dennis A. Revicki, Carolyn E. Schwartz

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2009

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Excerpt

Who owns the rights to health outcome-related items and instruments? There are various responses to this question, and varying interpretations of what is meant by intellectual property rights. Intellectual property lawyers would likely have a complicated and involved interpretation and it is our understanding that collections of items can be copyrighted as instruments, but the question is less clear for the individual items. Does this mean that any researcher can take any collection of items from one or more existing instruments and create a new instrument? Yes, we think so, but (and this is an important but) the new instrument cannot be labeled as any of the existing instrument(s) used to derive the new form. Recently, a group of researchers examined the factor structure and psychometric qualities of the standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [1] and found that several of the items may not be relevant for the Greek translation of the instrument [2]. While the psychometric results are useful for understanding the measurement qualities of the AQLQ, the authors implied that they developed a new version of the instrument, the AQLQ-18. This resulted in an interesting exchange of perspectives related to intellectual property and copyright issues related to health outcome measures [3, 4]. …
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Juniper, E., Buist, S., Cox, F. M., Ferrie, P. J., & King, D. R. (1999). Validation of a standardized version of the asthma quality of life questionnaire. Chest, 115, 1265–1270.CrossRefPubMed Juniper, E., Buist, S., Cox, F. M., Ferrie, P. J., & King, D. R. (1999). Validation of a standardized version of the asthma quality of life questionnaire. Chest, 115, 1265–1270.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Grammatopolous, E., Skordilis, E., Koutsouki, D., & Baltopoulos, G. (2009). An 18-item standardized asthma quality of life questionnaire-AQLQ(S). Quality of Life Research, 17, 323–332.CrossRef Grammatopolous, E., Skordilis, E., Koutsouki, D., & Baltopoulos, G. (2009). An 18-item standardized asthma quality of life questionnaire-AQLQ(S). Quality of Life Research, 17, 323–332.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Juniper, E. (2009). Modification, translation and adaptation of questionnaires: Should copyright laws be observed? Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 531–533. Juniper, E. (2009). Modification, translation and adaptation of questionnaires: Should copyright laws be observed? Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 531–533.
4.
go back to reference Grammatopolous, E., Skordilis, E., Koutsouki, D., & Baltopoulos, G. (2009). An 18-item AQLQ(s) model: A response to Juniper. Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 535–539. Grammatopolous, E., Skordilis, E., Koutsouki, D., & Baltopoulos, G. (2009). An 18-item AQLQ(s) model: A response to Juniper. Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 535–539.
5.
go back to reference Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group through its first two years. Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S3–S11.CrossRefPubMed Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group through its first two years. Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S3–S11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., et al. (2009). Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report. Value Health, 12, 419–429.CrossRefPubMed Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., et al. (2009). Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report. Value Health, 12, 419–429.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8, 94–104.CrossRefPubMed Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8, 94–104.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Intellectual property rights and good research practice
Auteurs
Dennis A. Revicki
Carolyn E. Schwartz
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2009
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9551-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2009

Quality of Life Research 10/2009 Naar de uitgave