Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The de facto standard method for valuing EQ-5D health states is the time trade-off (TTO), an iterative choice procedure. The TTO requires a starting point (SP), an initial offer of time in full health which is compared to a fixed offer of time in impaired health. From the SP, the time in full health is manipulated until preferential indifference. The SP is arbitrary, but may influence respondents, an effect known as anchoring bias. The aim of the study was to explore the potential anchoring effect and its magnitude in TTO experiments.
A total of 1249 respondents valued 8 EQ-5D health states in a Web study. We used the lead time TTO (LT-TTO) which allows eliciting negative and positive values with a uniform method. Respondents were randomized to 11 different SPs. Anchoring bias was assessed using OLS regression with SP as the independent variable. In a secondary experiment, we compared two different SPs in the UK EQ-5D valuation study TTO protocol.
A 1-year increase in the SP, corresponding to an increase in TTO value of 0.1, resulted in 0.02 higher recorded LT-TTO value. SP had little impact on the relative distance and ordering of the eight health states. Results were similar to the secondary experiment.
The anchoring effect may bias TTO values. In this Web-based valuation study, the observed anchoring effect was substantial. Further studies are needed to determine whether the effect is present in face-to-face experiments.
Lenert, L., & Kaplan, R. M. (2000). Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Medical care, 38(9), II-138.
Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35–42. CrossRef
McNamee, P., Ternent, L., Gbangou, A., & Newlands, D. (2010). A game of two halves? Incentive incompatibility, starting point bias and the bidding game contingent valuation method. Health Economics, 19(1), 75–87. PubMed
van Exel, N. J. A., Brouwer, W. B. F., van den Berg, B., & Koopmanschap, M. A. (2006). With a little help from an anchor: Discussion and evidence of anchoring effects in contingent valuation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(5), 836–853. CrossRef
Kind, P., Brooks, R., & Rabin, R. (2005). EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history. Berlin: Springer. CrossRef
Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2008). Face-to-face versus web surveying in a high-Internet-coverage population. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 836–846. CrossRef
- Influenced from the start: anchoring bias in time trade-off valuations
Liv Ariane Augestad
Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
Carl Haakon Samuelsen
- Springer International Publishing