Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 4/2015

01-04-2015

Influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on oral health-related quality of life, orofacial esthetics and chewing function based on patient-reported outcomes

Auteurs: Sanja Peršić, Asja Čelebić

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to assess influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on improvement of orofacial esthetics, chewing function (CF) and oral health-related quality of life.

Methods

Patients treated with 70 conventional complete dentures (CDs), 38 implant-supported mandibular complete dentures opposed to maxillary CDs, 56 conventional removable partial dentures, 15 implant-supported removable partial dentures, 25 conventional fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and 59 implant-supported fixed partial dentures (IFPDs) were included. The survey was conducted using the three questionnaires: the OHIP-CRO14, the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-CRO) and the Chewing Function Questionnaire (CFQ), and administrated twice: at the baseline prior the therapy and 3 months after prosthodontic rehabilitation had been finished.

Results

The after-treatment scores were significantly better than the baseline scores (p < 0.001) for the OES, OHIP14 and CF questionnaires in all types of treatments. The two-factor ANOVA showed no significant difference for the OES after-treatment scores between different rehabilitation options and implant presence, but the OHIP14 and CFQ after-treatment scores were significantly better in FPD and IFPDs than in removable implant and conventional denture wearers. The score change was significantly higher in all implant removable denture patients for the OES, OHIP and CFQ. The lowest score change was registered in the FPD wearers. (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Removable denture implant patients most benefited from implant support, but IFPD and FPD had the best after-treatment scores. The assessed clinical parameters may help dentists in choice of the best rehabilitation option with the highest treatment effect.
vorige artikel Common patterns of morbidity and multi-morbidity and their impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from a national survey
volgende artikel Living with orofacial conditions: psychological distress and quality of life in adults affected with Treacher Collins syndrome, cherubism, or oligodontia/ectodermal dysplasia—a comparative study
Literatuur
1.
Brennan, D. S., Spencer, A. J., & Roberts-Thomson, K. F. (2008). Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 17, 227–235.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Inukai, M., John, M. T., Igarashi, Y., & Baba, K. (2010). Association between perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life in partially dentate patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 118.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
Montero, J., López, J. F., Galindo, M. P., Vicente, P., & Bravo, M. (2009). Impact of prosthodontic status on oral wellbeing: A cross-sectional cohort study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 36, 592–600.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Spalj, S., Lajnert, V., & Ivankovic, L. (2014). The psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire—translation and cross-cultural validation in Croatia. Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1267–1271.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Yoshizumi, D. T. (1964). An evaluation of factors pertinent to the success of complete denture service. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 14, 866–878.CrossRef
6.
Zlatarić, D. K., & Celebić, A. (2008). Factors related to patients’ general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: A stepwise multiple regression analysis. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 21, 86–88.PubMed
7.
Carlsson, G. E. (1998). Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 79, 17–23.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Čelebić, A., Knezović-Zlatarić, D., Papić, M., Carek, V., Baucić, I., & Stipetić, J. (2003). Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 58(10), M948–M953.CrossRef
9.
Allen, P. F., & McMillan, A. S. (2003). A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 14, 173–179.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Assunção, W. G., Barão, V. A., Delben, J. A., Gomes, E. A., & Tabata, L. F. (2009). A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: A literature review. Gerodontology, 27, 154–162.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Strassburger, C., Kerchbaum, T., & Heydecke, G. (2006). Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 19, 339–348.PubMed
12.
Cordaro, L., di Torresanto, V. M., Petricevic, N., Jornet, P. R., & Torsello, F. (2013). Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 536–542.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Persic, S., Palac, A., Vojvodic, D., & Celebic, A. (2014). Initial effects of a treatment by fixed partial dentures supported by mini dental implants from a patient’s point of view. Collegium Antropologicum, 38(1), 275–278.PubMed
14.
Naert, I., Alsaadi, G., & Quirynen, M. (2004). Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 10-year randomized clinical study. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 17, 401–410.PubMed
15.
Fueki, K., Kimoto, K., Ogawa, T., & Garrett, N. R. (2007). Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: A systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 98, 470–477.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Yu, S. J., Chen, P., & Zhu, G. X. (2013). Relationship between implantation of missing anterior teeth and oral health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 22, 1613–1620.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Singh, B. P., Pradhan, K. N., Tripathi, A., Tua, R., & Tripathi, S. (2012). Effect of sociodemographic variables on complete denture satisfaction. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 4, 43–51.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
Lee, I. C., Yang, Y. H., Ho, P. S., & Lee, I. C. (2012). Exploring the quality of life after denture-wearing within elders in Kaohsiung. Gerodontology, 29, e1067–e1077.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Slade, G. D., & Spencer, A. J. (1994). Development and the evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dental Health, 11, 3–11.PubMed
20.
John, M. T. (2007). Exploring dimensions of oral health-related quality of life using experts-opinions. Quality of Life Research, 16, 697–704.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zlataric, D. K., & Celebic, A. (2001). Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: A comparison between patient and prosthodontist assessments. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 14, 423–426.PubMed
22.
John, M. T., Reißmann, D. R., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., et al. (2014). Factor analyses of the Oral Health Impact Profile—overview and studied population. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 58(1), 26–34.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
John, M. T., Reissmann, D. R., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., et al. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. doi:10.​1111/​joor.​12192.
24.
John, M. T., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., Celebić, A., et al. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. doi:10.​1111/​joor.​12191.
25.
Bimbashi, V., Celebić, A., Islami, A., Asllani-Hoxha, F., & Petricević, N. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Albanian language version of the OHIP-ALB49 Questionnaire in the Republic of Kosovo. Collegium Antropologicum, 36, 1189–1195.PubMed
26.
Rener-Sitar, K., Celebić, A., Petricević, N., Papić, M., Sapundzhiev, D., Kansky, A., et al. (2009). The Slovenian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire (OHIP-SVN): Translation and psychometric properties. Collegium Antropologicum, 33, 1177–1183.PubMed
27.
Peršić, S., Milardović, S., Mehulić, K., & Čelebić, A. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and suggestions for modification. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 24(6), 523–533.PubMed
28.
Larsson, P., John, M. T., Nilner, K., Bondemark, L., & List, T. (2010). Development of an Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 23, 249–256.PubMed
29.
Peršić, S., Palac, A., Bunjevac, T., & Čelebić, A. (2013). Development of a new chewing function questionnaire for assessment of a self-perceived chewing function. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 41(6), 565–573.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Hsu, K. J., Lee, H. E., Wu, Y. M., La, S. J., Huang, S. T., & Yen, Y. Y. (2014). Masticatory factors as predictors of oral health-related quality of life among elderly people in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. Quality of Life Research, 23, 1395–1405.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Chen, P., & Yu, S. (2012). Zhu. The psychosocial impacts of implantation on the dental aesthetics of missing anterior teeth patients. British Dental Journal, 213(11), E20.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Knezović Zlatarić, D., Celebić, A., Valentić-Peruzović, M., Jerolimov, V., & Pandurić, J. (2003). A survey of treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 30(8), 847–854.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Petričević, N., Čelebić, A., Papić, M., & Rener-Sitar, K. (2009). The Croatian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire. Collegium Antropologicum, 33, 841–847.PubMed
34.
Rener-Sitar, K., Petricević, N., Celebić, A., & Marion, L. (2008). Psychometric properties of Croatian and Slovenian short form of oral health impact profile questionnaires. Croatian Medical Journal, 49, 536–544.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
35.
Reissmann, D. R., Sierwald, I., Heydecke, G., & John, M. T. (2013). Interpreting one oral health impact profile point. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 12.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
36.
Celebic, A., & Knezović-Zlataric, D. (2003). A comparison of patient’s satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. Journal of Dentistry, 31, 445–451.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Kovac, Z., Troskot, Z., Uhac, I., Cabov, T., Lajnert, V., Pavicić, D. K., et al. (2012). Multivariate analysis of different factors affecting the patient general satisfaction with complete dentures. Collegium Antropologicum, 36, 791–794.PubMed
38.
Bellini, D., Dos Santos, M. B., De Paula Prisco Da Cunha, V., & Marchini, L. J. (2009). Patients’ expectations and satisfaction of complete denture therapy and correlation with locus of control. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 36, 682–686.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Locker, D., Clarke, M., & Payne, B. (2000). Self-perceived oral health status, psychological well-being and life satisfaction in an older adult population. Journal of Dental Research, 79, 970–975.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Kovacic, I., Badrov, J., Vidovic, N., & Celebic, A. (2011). Preliminary clinical report of satisfaction with prosthodontic rehabilitation of intellectually disabled young adults provided by parents or caregivers. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 24(4), 303–305.PubMed
41.
Petricevic, N., Celebic, A., & Rener-Sitar, K. (2012). A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. Gerodontology, 29(2), e956–e963.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Swelem, A. A., Gurevich, K. G., Fabrikant, E. G., Hassan, M. H., & Aqou, S. (2014). Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients treated with removable, fixed, fixed-removable, and implant-supported prostheses. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 27, 338–347.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Fillion, M., Aubazac, D., Bessadet, M., Allègre, M., & Nicolas, E. (2013). The impact of implant treatment on oral health related quality of life in a private dental practice: A prospective cohort study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 197.CrossRef
44.
Wolfart, S., Moll, D., Hilgers, R. D., Wolfart, M., & Kern, M. (2013). Implant placement under existing removable dental prostheses and its effect on oral health-related quality of life. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 1354–1359.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Duvernay, E., Srinivasan, M., Legrand, L. D., Herrmann, F. R., von Steinbüchel, N., & Müller, F. (2014). Dental appearance and personality trait judgment of elderly persons. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 27, 348.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Kranjcic, J., Mikus, A., Mehulic, K., & Vojvodic, D. (2014). Knowledge and awareness of dental implants among elderly people in Croatia. Journal of Prosthodontics. doi:10.​1111/​jopr.​12172.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on oral health-related quality of life, orofacial esthetics and chewing function based on patient-reported outcomes
Auteurs
Sanja Peršić
Asja Čelebić
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0817-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2015

Quality of Life Research 4/2015 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Glycaemic control and quality of life among ethnically diverse Malaysian diabetic patients

OriginalPaper

Common patterns of morbidity and multi-morbidity and their impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from a national survey

OriginalPaper

A new computerized adaptive test advancing the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children: the Kids-CAT

OriginalPaper

Measuring changes in health over time using the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: a head-to-head comparison of measurement properties and sensitivity to change in a German inpatient rehabilitation sample

OriginalPaper

Why visually impaired older adults often do not receive mental health services: the patient’s perspective

Brief Communication

Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke