Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Previous research has shown that aging increases susceptibility to inattentional blindness (Graham and Burke, Psychol Aging 26:162, 2011) as well as individual differences in cognitive ability related to working memory and executive functions in separate studies. Therefore, the present study was conducted in an attempt to bridge a gap that involved investigating ‘age-sensitive’ cognitive abilities that may predict inattentional blindness in a sample of older adults. We investigated whether individual differences in general fluid intelligence and speed of processing would predict inattentional blindness in our sample of older adults. Thirty-six healthy older adults took part in the study. Using the inattentional blindness paradigm developed by Most et al. (Psychol Rev 112:217, 2005), we investigated whether rates of inattentional blindness could be predicted by participant’s performance on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices and a choice-reaction time task. A Mann–Whitney U test revealed that a higher score on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices was significantly associated with lower incidences of inattentional blindness. However, a t test revealed that choice-reaction times were not significantly associated with inattentional blindness. Preliminary results from the present study suggest that individual differences in general fluid intelligence are predictive of inattentional blindness in older adults but not speed of processing. Moreover, our findings are consistent with previous studies that have suggested executive attention control may be the source of these individual differences. These findings also highlight the association between attention and general fluid intelligence and how it may impact environmental awareness. Future research would benefit from repeating these analyses in a larger sample and also including a younger comparison group.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. D. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(4), 567. CrossRef
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science (Regular Edition), 4(11), 417–423. CrossRef
Bredemeier, K., & Simons, D. J. (2012). Working memory and inattentional blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(2), 239–244. CrossRef
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: a critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1. CrossRef
Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30(2), 163–183. CrossRef
Deary, I. J., & Der, G. (2005). Reaction time, age, and cognitive ability: longitudinal findings from age 16 to 63 years in representative population samples. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12(2), 187–215. CrossRef
Duncan, J. (2006). Brain mechanisms of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2–27. CrossRef
Embretson, S. E. (1995). The role of working memory capacity and general control processes in intelligence. Intelligence, 20(2), 169–189. CrossRef
Engle, R. W., Kane, M., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. Models of working memory: mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York: Cambridge University press.
Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2007). Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 142–147. CrossRef
Hambrick, D. Z. (2003). Why are some people more knowledgeable than others? A longitudinal study of knowledge acquisition. Memory &Cognition, 31(6), 902–917. CrossRef
Hamel, R., & Schmittmann, V. D. (2006). The 20-minute version as a predictor of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 1039–1046. CrossRef
Heitz, R. P., Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity, attention control, and fluid intelligence. In O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 61–77). New York: Sage. CrossRef
Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. W., & Dixon, R. A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(2), P101–P115. CrossRef
Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Elsevier.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 637–671. CrossRef
Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14(4), 389–433. CrossRef
Macdonald, J. S., & Lavie, N. (2011). Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1780–1789. CrossRef
Madden, D. J. (2001). Speed and timing of behavioral processes. Handbook of the psychology of aging, Vol 5, pp. 288–312.
McKnight, P. E., & Najab, J. (2010). Mann‐Whitney U Test. Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol 1
Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 480–494. CrossRef
Nordstokke, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). A new nonparametric Levene test for equal variances. Psicologica, 31, 401–430.
Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K. W., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(1), 256–259. CrossRef
Raven, J., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales., Section 4: the advanced progressive matrices Oxford: Oxford Psychologists press.
Shammi, P., Bosman, E., & Stuss, D. T. (1998). Aging and variability in performance. Aging.
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1964). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples) (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University). Neuropsychology and Cognition, 5(1), 1–13.
Stuss, D. T., & Knight, R. T. (Eds.). (2013). Principles of frontal lobe function. NY: Oxford University Press.
Süß, H. M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability—and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30(3), 261–288. CrossRef
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between Operation Span and Raven. Intelligence, 33(1), 67–81. CrossRef
Wilckens, K. A., Erickson, K. I., & Wheeler, M. E. (2012). Age-related decline in controlled retrieval: the role of the PFC and sleep. Neural plasticity, 2012.
- Individual differences in fluid intelligence predicts inattentional blindness in a sample of older adults: a preliminary study
Deirdre M. O’Shea
Robert A. Fieo
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg