Top

Gepubliceerd in:

16-09-2019 | Empirical Research

Individual Attitudes toward Deviant Behavior and Perceived Attitudes of Friends: Self-stereotyping and Social Projection in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood

Auteur: Daniel Seddig

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 3/2020

Abstract

The transmission of attitudes toward deviant behavior occurs in social contexts such as peer groups. Accordingly, individuals align their attitudes to those of friends because they want to belong to that social category or, conversely, individual attitudes influence the perception of peer attitudes. Hence, individuals self-stereotype themselves as being members of a peer group or they project their attitudes onto friends. However, it is unclear which process—self-stereotyping or social projection—is predominant in determining similarity of individual and peer attitudes toward deviant behavior. Furthermore, it is unclear whether predominance changes between early/middle adolescence and emerging adulthood. These gaps are examined with panel data on individual attitudes toward deviant behavior and perceived attitudes of individuals’ friends from a German study covering ages 14 to 20 (N = 3723; proportion of male respondents across panel waves ranges between 42 and 49%). A random intercepts cross-lagged panel model is applied to the data to estimate within-person effects in both directions, which allows to answer whether self-stereotyping or social projection is predominant and whether predominance changes across time. The results indicate that self-stereotyping is active almost entirely in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Reversed effects only occur during the transition from adolescence to emerging adulthood, signaling a developmental shift toward social projection. Thus, the influence of perceived peer attitudes toward deviant behavior on individual attitudes decreases in the phase in which adolescents develop into young adults. At the same time, individuals’ own attitudes become increasingly influential for making inferences about the attitudes of their peers.

vorige artikel The Role of Prosocial and Aggressive Popularity Norm Combinations in Prosocial and Aggressive Friendship Processes

volgende artikel Being Friends with or Rejected by Classmates: Aggression Toward Same- and Cross-Ethnic Peers

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

For this purpose, respondents had to recall a self-generated code across time. This method was used to ensure the greatest extent of anonymity. However, the ability of respondents to memorize their individual code correctly is distributed differently, for example across gender.

A description of the German educational system with its different school types is given by the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany (2017).

Ethnicity was inferred from parents’ country of origin (asked at age 14). For example, the proportion of respondents holding German citizenship is much higher (86% at age 20).

Descriptive information on the 140 items (10 items per construct across 7 panel waves) can be requested from the author.

In the current analysis, the units are individuals. However, in other research contexts units may refer to other entities such as companies, countries, cultures, or groups.

The terms factor and construct are used interchangeably in this context.

All chi-squares reported in this study refer to the test statistic of Yuan and Bentler (2000). Chi-square difference tests refer to the method proposed by Satorra and Bentler (2010).

Akers, R. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure. A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Allison, P. D., Williams, R., & Moral-Benito, E. (2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius, 3, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117710578.CrossRef

Ames, D. R., Weber, E. U., & Zou, X. (2012). Mind-reading in strategic interaction: the impact of perceived similarity on projection and stereotyping. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.007.CrossRef

Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: what is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x.CrossRef

Berry, D., & Willoughby, M. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross‐lagged panel models: rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88, 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12660.CrossRefPubMed

Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 363–394). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRef

Clement, R. W., & Krueger, J. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164471.CrossRefPubMed

Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558.CrossRefPubMed

Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20, 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000041.CrossRefPubMed

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046.CrossRefPubMed

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25, 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582.CrossRef

Finney, S. J., & Di Stefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course (pp. 439–492). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020.CrossRef

Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2019). Selection and influence: a meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35, 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-018-9384-y.CrossRef

Hamaker, E. L. (2018). How to run a multiple indicator RI-CLPM with Mplus. https://www.statmodel.com/download/RI-CLPM.pdf.

Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889.CrossRefPubMed

Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: how do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0018.CrossRef

Hogg, M. A., & Smith, J. R. (2007). Attitudes in social context: a social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 89–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701592070.CrossRef

Jennings, W. G., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the number and shape of developmental/life-course violence, aggression, and delinquency trajectories: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.07.001.CrossRef

Krueger, J. I. (2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701284645.CrossRef

Kuiper, R. M., & Ryan, O. (2018). Drawing conclusions from cross-lagged relationships: re-considering the role of the time-interval. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 809–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1431046.CrossRef

Locke, K. D., Craig, T., Baik, K.-D., & Gohil, K. (2012). Binds and bounds of communion: effects of interpersonal values on assumed similarity of self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 879–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029422.CrossRefPubMed

Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Age-crime curve. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 12–18). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_474.CrossRef

Machunsky, M., Toma, C., Yzerbyt, V., & Corneille, O. (2014). Social projection increases for positive targets: ascertaining the effect and exploring its antecedents. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1373–1388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214545039.CrossRef

Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2010). The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. London: Sage.

Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1994). Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis: common, time‐specific, item‐specific, and residual‐error components of variance. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 116–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519409539968.CrossRef

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.CrossRef

Megens, K. C. I. M., & Weerman, F. M. (2012). The social transmission of delinquency: effects of peer attitudes and behavior revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 420–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427811408432.CrossRef

Moffitt, T. E. (2018). Male antisocial behaviour in adolescence and beyond. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0309-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide, 8th edition. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

Muthén, B. O., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. https://www.statmodel.com/download/Article_075.pdf.

Muthén, B. O., Muthén, L., & Asparouhov, T. (2015). Estimator choices with categorical outcomes. https://www.statmodel.com/download/EstimatorChoices.pdf.

Onorato, R. S., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Fluidity in the self-concept: the shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.195.CrossRef

Painter, K. A., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Gender differences in crime. Criminal Justice Matters, 55, 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09627250408553584.CrossRef

Pardini, D. A., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2005). Developmental shifts in parent and peer influences on boys’ beliefs about delinquent behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00098.x.CrossRef

Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30.CrossRefPubMed

Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00911.x.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J. (2006). Quantifying parsimony in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 227–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_1.CrossRefPubMed

Prislin, R., & Wood, W. (2005). Social influence in attitudes and attitude change. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 671–705). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Rebellon, C. J. (2012). Differential association and substance use: assessing the roles of discriminant validity, socialization, and selection in traditional empirical tests. European Journal of Criminology, 9, 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811421647.CrossRef

Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., Spears, R., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). A social mind: the context of John Turner’s work and its influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 344–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2012.745672.CrossRef

Reinecke, J. (2013). Growth curve models and panel dropouts: applications with criminological panel data. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 67, 122–131.

Reinecke, J., & Weins, C. (2013). The development of delinquency during adolescence: a comparison of missing data techniques. Quality & Quantity, 47, 3319–3334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9721-4.CrossRef

Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315.CrossRefPubMed

Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: a review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3.CrossRefPubMed

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.CrossRefPubMed

Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany (2017). The education system in the Federal Republic of Germany 2015/2016. Bonn, Germany: Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany. Retrieved from https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/Eurydice/Bildungswesen-engl-pdfs/dossier_en_ebook.pdf.

Seddig, D., & Davidov, E. (2018). Values, attitudes toward interpersonal violence, and interpersonal violent behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 604 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Seddig, D., & Reinecke, J. (2017). Exploration and explanation of adolescent self-reported delinquency trajectories in the Crimoc study. In A. Blokland & V. van der Geest (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of life-course criminolgy (pp. 159–178). London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRef

Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Serafim, A. D. P., de Barros, D. M., Castellana, G. B., & Gorenstein, C. (2014). Personality traits and violent behavior: a comparison between psychopathic and non-psychopathic male murderers. Psychiatry Research, 219, 604–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.026.CrossRef

Shavitt, S., & Nelson, M. (2002). The role of attitude functions in persuasion and social judgment. In J.P. Dillard & M. Pfau, The persuasion handbook: developments in theory and practice (pp. 137–154). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976046.n8.

Sheldon, K. M. (2005). Positive value change during college: normative trends and individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.02.002.CrossRef

Sijtsema, J. J., & Lindenberg, S. M. (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.08.002.CrossRef

Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002.CrossRefPubMed

Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (2000). Attitude–behavior relations: social identity and group membership. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Applied social research. Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 67–93). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Thurner, F. (2018). Social projection vs. self-stereotyping: the role of socio-cognitive mindsets in the activation of cognitive inferential processes. University of Mannheim, Mannheim. Retrieved from https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/46239/1/Dissertation_Thurner.pdf.

Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2018). Attitude certainty: antecedents, consequences, and new directions. Consumer Psychology Review, 1, 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1004.CrossRef

Turner, J., & Reynolds, K. (2012). Self-categorization theory. In P. A. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (vol. 2, pp. 399–417). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n46.

van Veelen, R., Otten, S., Cadinu, M., & Hansen, N. (2016). An integrative model of social identification: self-stereotyping and self-anchoring as two cognitive pathways. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315576642.CrossRefPubMed

Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S., Alessandri, G., Döring, A. K., Castellani, V., & Caprara, M. G. (2016). Stability and change of basic personal values in early adulthood: an 8-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.002.CrossRef

Visser, P. S., & Krosnick, J. A. (1998). Development of attitude strength over the life cycle: surge and decline. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1389–1410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1389.CrossRefPubMed

Voelkle, M. C., Gische, C., Driver, C. C., & Lindenberger, U. (2019). The role of time in the quest for understanding psychological mechanisms. Multivariate Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1496813.CrossRef

Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods, 17, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027543.CrossRefPubMed

Weerman, F. M. (2004). The changing role of delinquent peers in childhood and adolescence: issues, findings and puzzles. In G. J. N. Bruinsma, H. Elffers, & J. de Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators. Developments in criminology and criminal justice research, (pp. 279–297). Devon: Willan Publishing.

Weerman, F. M., & Smeenk, W. H. (2005). Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: a comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology, 43, 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00015.x.CrossRef

Weerman, F. M., Wilcox, P., & Sullivan, C. J. (2018). The short-term dynamics of peers and delinquent behavior: an analysis of bi-weekly changes within a high school student network. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 431–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9340-2.CrossRefPubMed

West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Young, J. T. N., Rebellon, C. J., Barnes, J. C., & Weerman, F. M. (2015). What do alternative measures of peer behavior tell us? Examining the discriminant validity of multiple methods of measuring peer Deviance and the implications for etiological models. Justice Quarterly, 32, 626–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.788730.CrossRef

Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In M. E. Sobel & P. Mark (Eds.), Sociological methodology 2000 (pp. 165–200). Washington, DC: ASA.

Zhang, Q., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1997). Developmental trends of delinquent attitudes and behaviors: replications and synthesis across domains, time, and samples. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 13, 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221307.CrossRef

Titel: Individual Attitudes toward Deviant Behavior and Perceived Attitudes of Friends: Self-stereotyping and Social Projection in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood
Auteur: Daniel Seddig
Publicatiedatum: 16-09-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01123-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Is the Peer Presence Effect on Heightened Adolescent Risky Decision-Making only Present in Males?

Open Access
Empirical Research

National Identity Development and Friendship Network Dynamics among Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Youth

Empirical Research

Evidence that Different Types of Peer Victimization have Equivalent Associations with Transdiagnostic Psychopathology in Adolescence

Empirical Research

Prestigious Youth are Leaders but Central Youth are Powerful: What Social Network Position Tells us About Peer Relationships

Empirical Research

Associations between Ethnic Minority Status and Popularity in Adolescence: the role of Ethnic Classroom Composition and Aggression

Open Access
Empirical Research

Prosocial Peers as Risk, Protective, and Promotive Factors for the Prevention of Delinquency and Drug Use

Empirical Research