Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2017

17-12-2016

In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions

Auteurs: Nancy E. Mayo, Ala’ Aburub, Marie-Josée Brouillette, Ayse Kuspinar, Carolina Moriello, Ana Maria Rodriguez, Susan Scott

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Background

Individualized measures of health-related quality life (HRQL) have been used for decades and shown to provide unique information, but little work has been done to explain this uniqueness particularly across health conditions.

Aims

To estimate, across four health conditions, the magnitude of the association between scores derived from the Patient Generated Index (PGI) and those from fully standardized generic and disease-specific measures of the HRQL; to identify the extent to which the areas generated from the PGI are covered by the content of the fully standardized measures.

Methods

The PGI and other generic and disease-specific measures had been used in four different samples of people: stroke (n = 222), multiple sclerosis (MS; n = 185); advanced cancer (n = 173), and HIV+ (n = 690). Areas nominated on the PGI were harmonized to a standard nomenclature. Pearson correlations were estimated between PGI and other measures.

Results

Data from 1263 people indicated that PGI provided the lowest rating for HRQL across all health conditions. The areas nominated differed across conditions with walking/mobility: the most common for stroke (42%), work/school for MS (62%), health for HIV+ (97%), and fatigue for cancer (39%). Many of the aspects of health included in generic measures were not nominated using the PGI and vice versa. The highest correlations between the PGI and other measures were observed for people with MS, with correlations between 0.53 and 0.59; lowest correlations were observed for people with HIV and cancer, ≤0.33.

Discussion

The PGI scores reflect those aspects of quality of life that are important to patients in which they would most value an improvement. Heterogeneity in HRQL across health conditions is poorly discriminated using standardized measures. A “one-size-fits-all” approach to HRQL assessment may not provide the most useful representation of this important construct.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Joyce, C. R. B., Hickey, A., McGee, H. M., & O’Boyle, C. A. (2003). A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: The SEIQoL. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 275–280.CrossRefPubMed Joyce, C. R. B., Hickey, A., McGee, H. M., & O’Boyle, C. A. (2003). A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: The SEIQoL. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 275–280.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Farrand, P., & Woodford, J. (2013). Measurement of individualised quality of life amongst young people with indicated personality disorder during emerging adulthood using the SEIQoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 22(4), 829–838.CrossRefPubMed Farrand, P., & Woodford, J. (2013). Measurement of individualised quality of life amongst young people with indicated personality disorder during emerging adulthood using the SEIQoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 22(4), 829–838.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Keenan, A. V. (2013). Mandibular implant supported complete dentures improved quality of life. Evidence Based Dentistry, 14(1), 19–20.CrossRefPubMed Keenan, A. V. (2013). Mandibular implant supported complete dentures improved quality of life. Evidence Based Dentistry, 14(1), 19–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., & MacDonald, L. M. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index. Medical Care, 32(11), 1109–1126.CrossRefPubMed Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., & MacDonald, L. M. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index. Medical Care, 32(11), 1109–1126.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Martin, F., Camfield, L., Rodham, K., Kliempt, P., & Ruta, D. (2007). Twelve years’ experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: A graded structured review. Quality of Life Research, 16(4), 705–715.CrossRefPubMed Martin, F., Camfield, L., Rodham, K., Kliempt, P., & Ruta, D. (2007). Twelve years’ experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: A graded structured review. Quality of Life Research, 16(4), 705–715.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Garratt, A. M. (2015). Evaluation of the stages of completion and scoring of the Patient Generated Index (PGI) in patients with rheumatic diseases. Quality of Life Research, 24(11), 2625–2635.CrossRefPubMed Garratt, A. M. (2015). Evaluation of the stages of completion and scoring of the Patient Generated Index (PGI) in patients with rheumatic diseases. Quality of Life Research, 24(11), 2625–2635.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Becker, G., Merk, C. S., Meffert, C., & Momm, F. (2014). Measuring individual quality of life in patients receiving radiation therapy: The SEIQoL-Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 23(7), 2025–2030.CrossRefPubMed Becker, G., Merk, C. S., Meffert, C., & Momm, F. (2014). Measuring individual quality of life in patients receiving radiation therapy: The SEIQoL-Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 23(7), 2025–2030.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Griffiths, R., Jayasuriya, R., & Maitland, H. (2000). Development of a client-generated health outcome measure for community nursing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 24(5), 529–535.CrossRefPubMed Griffiths, R., Jayasuriya, R., & Maitland, H. (2000). Development of a client-generated health outcome measure for community nursing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 24(5), 529–535.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., Dziedzic, K., & Dawes, P. T. (2003). Patient centered assessment of ankylosing spondylitis-specific health related quality of life: evaluation of the Patient Generated Index. Journal of Rheumatology, 30(4), 764–773.PubMed Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., Dziedzic, K., & Dawes, P. T. (2003). Patient centered assessment of ankylosing spondylitis-specific health related quality of life: evaluation of the Patient Generated Index. Journal of Rheumatology, 30(4), 764–773.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Klokkerud, M., Grotle, M., Lochting, I., Kjeken, I., Hagen, K. B., & Garratt, A. M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the patient generated index in patients with rheumatic diseases participating in rehabilitation or self-management programmes. Rheumatology (Oxford), 52(5), 924–932.CrossRef Klokkerud, M., Grotle, M., Lochting, I., Kjeken, I., Hagen, K. B., & Garratt, A. M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the patient generated index in patients with rheumatic diseases participating in rehabilitation or self-management programmes. Rheumatology (Oxford), 52(5), 924–932.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lochting, I., Grotle, M., Storheim, K., Werner, E. L., & Garratt, A. M. (2014). Individualized quality of life in patients with low back pain: Reliability and validity of the Patient Generated Index. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(8), 781–787.CrossRefPubMed Lochting, I., Grotle, M., Storheim, K., Werner, E. L., & Garratt, A. M. (2014). Individualized quality of life in patients with low back pain: Reliability and validity of the Patient Generated Index. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(8), 781–787.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McGee, H. M., O’Boyle, C. A., Hickey, A., O’Malley, K., & Joyce, C. R. (1991). Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population. Psychological Medicine, 21(3), 749–759.CrossRefPubMed McGee, H. M., O’Boyle, C. A., Hickey, A., O’Malley, K., & Joyce, C. R. (1991). Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population. Psychological Medicine, 21(3), 749–759.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., & Russell, I. T. (1999). Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions. Quality in Health Care, 8(1), 22–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., & Russell, I. T. (1999). Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions. Quality in Health Care, 8(1), 22–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Tully, M., & Cantrill, J. (2002). The test-retest reliability of the modified Patient Generated Index. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7(2), 81–89.CrossRefPubMed Tully, M., & Cantrill, J. (2002). The test-retest reliability of the modified Patient Generated Index. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7(2), 81–89.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Witham, M. D., Fulton, R. L., Wilson, L., Leslie, C. A., & McMurdo, M. E. (2008). Validation of an individualised quality of life measure in older day hospital patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Witham, M. D., Fulton, R. L., Wilson, L., Leslie, C. A., & McMurdo, M. E. (2008). Validation of an individualised quality of life measure in older day hospital patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Jr., Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32(1), 40–66.CrossRefPubMed McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Jr., Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32(1), 40–66.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference DE Beaton, Hogg-Johnson, S., & Bombardier, C. (1997). Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(1), 79–93.CrossRefPubMed DE Beaton, Hogg-Johnson, S., & Bombardier, C. (1997). Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(1), 79–93.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference van Agt, H. M., Essink-Bot, M. L., Krabbe, P. F., & Bonsel, G. J. (1994). Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Social Science and Medicine, 39(11), 1537–1544.CrossRefPubMed van Agt, H. M., Essink-Bot, M. L., Krabbe, P. F., & Bonsel, G. J. (1994). Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Social Science and Medicine, 39(11), 1537–1544.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Witham, M. D., Crighton, L. J., & McMurdo, M. E. (2007). Using an individualised quality of life measure in older heart failure patients. International Journal of Cardiology, 116(1), 40–45.CrossRefPubMed Witham, M. D., Crighton, L. J., & McMurdo, M. E. (2007). Using an individualised quality of life measure in older heart failure patients. International Journal of Cardiology, 116(1), 40–45.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Macduff, C., & Russell, E. (1998). The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: Use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population. Quality of Life Research, 7(8), 761–769.CrossRefPubMed Macduff, C., & Russell, E. (1998). The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: Use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population. Quality of Life Research, 7(8), 761–769.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Prince, P. N., & Gerber, G. J. (2001). Measuring subjective quality of life in people with serious mental illness using the SEIqoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 10(2), 117–122.CrossRefPubMed Prince, P. N., & Gerber, G. J. (2001). Measuring subjective quality of life in people with serious mental illness using the SEIqoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 10(2), 117–122.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tavernier, S. S., Totten, A. M., & Beck, S. L. (2011). Assessing content validity of the patient generated index using cognitive interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 21(12), 1729–1738.CrossRefPubMed Tavernier, S. S., Totten, A. M., & Beck, S. L. (2011). Assessing content validity of the patient generated index using cognitive interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 21(12), 1729–1738.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lhussier, M., Watson, B., Reed, J., & Clarke, C. L. (2005). The SEIQoL and functional status: How do they relate? Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(4), 403–409.CrossRefPubMed Lhussier, M., Watson, B., Reed, J., & Clarke, C. L. (2005). The SEIQoL and functional status: How do they relate? Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(4), 403–409.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Smith, H. J., Taylor, R., & Mitchell, A. (2000). A comparison of four quality of life instruments in cardiac patients: SF-36, QLI, QLMI, and SEIQoL. Heart, 84(4), 390–394.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith, H. J., Taylor, R., & Mitchell, A. (2000). A comparison of four quality of life instruments in cardiac patients: SF-36, QLI, QLMI, and SEIQoL. Heart, 84(4), 390–394.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Jenkinson, C., Stradling, J., & Petersen, S. (1998). How should we evaluate health status? A comparison of three methods in patients presenting with obstructive sleep apnoea. Quality of Life Research, 7(2), 95–100.CrossRefPubMed Jenkinson, C., Stradling, J., & Petersen, S. (1998). How should we evaluate health status? A comparison of three methods in patients presenting with obstructive sleep apnoea. Quality of Life Research, 7(2), 95–100.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Jolles, B. M., Buchbinder, R., & Beaton, D. E. (2005). A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(8), 791–801.CrossRefPubMed Jolles, B. M., Buchbinder, R., & Beaton, D. E. (2005). A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(8), 791–801.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Broberger, E., Tishelman, C., von Essen, L., Doukkali, E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2007). Spontaneous reports of most distressing concerns in patients with inoperable lung cancer: At present, in retrospect and in comparison with EORTC-QLQ-C30+ LC13. Quality of Life Research, 16(10), 1635–1645.CrossRefPubMed Broberger, E., Tishelman, C., von Essen, L., Doukkali, E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2007). Spontaneous reports of most distressing concerns in patients with inoperable lung cancer: At present, in retrospect and in comparison with EORTC-QLQ-C30+ LC13. Quality of Life Research, 16(10), 1635–1645.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mayo, N. E., Anderson, S., Barclay, R., et al. (2015). Getting on with the rest of your life following stroke: A randomized trial of a complex intervention aimed at enhancing life participation post stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 9, 1198–1211.CrossRef Mayo, N. E., Anderson, S., Barclay, R., et al. (2015). Getting on with the rest of your life following stroke: A randomized trial of a complex intervention aimed at enhancing life participation post stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 9, 1198–1211.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kuspinar, A., & Mayo, N. E. (2013). Do generic utility measures capture what is important to the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kuspinar, A., & Mayo, N. E. (2013). Do generic utility measures capture what is important to the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Aburub, A. S., Gagnon, B., Rodriguez, A. M., & Mayo, N. E. (2016). Using a personalized measure (Patient Generated Index (PGI)) to identify what matters to people with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(1):437–445.CrossRefPubMed Aburub, A. S., Gagnon, B., Rodriguez, A. M., & Mayo, N. E. (2016). Using a personalized measure (Patient Generated Index (PGI)) to identify what matters to people with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(1):437–445.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Mayo, N. E., Brouillette, M. J., & Fellows, L. K. (2016). Understanding and optimizing brain health in HIV now: Protocol for a cohort multiple randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurology, 16(8), 1–10. Mayo, N. E., Brouillette, M. J., & Fellows, L. K. (2016). Understanding and optimizing brain health in HIV now: Protocol for a cohort multiple randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurology, 16(8), 1–10.
32.
go back to reference Shahrbanian, S., Duquette, P., Ahmed, S., & Mayo, N. E. (2015). Pain acts through fatigue to affect participation in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research. 25(2):477–491.CrossRefPubMed Shahrbanian, S., Duquette, P., Ahmed, S., & Mayo, N. E. (2015). Pain acts through fatigue to affect participation in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research. 25(2):477–491.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Rodriguez, A. M., Mayo, N. E., & Gagnon, B. (2013). Independent contributors to overall quality of life in people with advanced cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 108(9), 1790–1800.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez, A. M., Mayo, N. E., & Gagnon, B. (2013). Independent contributors to overall quality of life in people with advanced cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 108(9), 1790–1800.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Second revision ed. Geneva. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Second revision ed. Geneva.
35.
go back to reference Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(1), 59–65.CrossRefPubMed Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(1), 59–65.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.CrossRefPubMed Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Poissant, L., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., & Clarke, A. E. (2003). The development and preliminary validation of a Preference-Based Stroke Index (PBSI). Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1, 43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Poissant, L., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., & Clarke, A. E. (2003). The development and preliminary validation of a Preference-Based Stroke Index (PBSI). Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1, 43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Kuspinar, A., Bouchard, V., Moriello, C., & Mayo, N. E. (2016). Development of a bilingual MS-specific health classification system: The preference-based multiple sclerosis index. International Journal of MS Care, 18(2), 63–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kuspinar, A., Bouchard, V., Moriello, C., & Mayo, N. E. (2016). Development of a bilingual MS-specific health classification system: The preference-based multiple sclerosis index. International Journal of MS Care, 18(2), 63–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Kuspinar, A., Pickard, S., & Mayo, N. E. (2016). Developing a valuation function for the preference-based multiple sclerosis index: Comparison of standard gamble and rating scale. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0151905.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kuspinar, A., Pickard, S., & Mayo, N. E. (2016). Developing a valuation function for the preference-based multiple sclerosis index: Comparison of standard gamble and rating scale. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0151905.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Strobel, M. G., & Bui, F. (1995). The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: A measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliative Medicine, 9(3), 207–219.CrossRefPubMed Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Strobel, M. G., & Bui, F. (1995). The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: A measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliative Medicine, 9(3), 207–219.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care, 7(2), 6–9.PubMed Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care, 7(2), 6–9.PubMed
43.
go back to reference O’Connell, K. A., & Skevington, S. M. (2012). An international quality of life instrument to assess wellbeing in adults who are HIV-positive: A short form of the WHOQOL-HIV (31 items). AIDS and Behavior, 16(2), 452–460.CrossRefPubMed O’Connell, K. A., & Skevington, S. M. (2012). An international quality of life instrument to assess wellbeing in adults who are HIV-positive: A short form of the WHOQOL-HIV (31 items). AIDS and Behavior, 16(2), 452–460.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Mayo, N. E., Moriello, C., Asano, M., van der Spuy, S., & Finch, L. (2011). The extent to which common health-related quality of life indices capture constructs beyond symptoms and function. Quality of Life Research, 20(5), 621–627.CrossRefPubMed Mayo, N. E., Moriello, C., Asano, M., van der Spuy, S., & Finch, L. (2011). The extent to which common health-related quality of life indices capture constructs beyond symptoms and function. Quality of Life Research, 20(5), 621–627.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Smith R. The end of disease and the beginning of health. BMJ Blogs. 6-8-0008. Smith R. The end of disease and the beginning of health. BMJ Blogs. 6-8-0008.
46.
go back to reference Wong, M., Rietzschel, J., Mulherin, D., & David, C. (2009). Evaluation of a multidisciplinary outpatient pain management programme based at a community hospital. Musculoskeletal Care, 7(2), 106–120.CrossRefPubMed Wong, M., Rietzschel, J., Mulherin, D., & David, C. (2009). Evaluation of a multidisciplinary outpatient pain management programme based at a community hospital. Musculoskeletal Care, 7(2), 106–120.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Patel, K. K., Veenstra, D. L., & Patrick, D. L. (2003). A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials. Value Health, 6(5), 595–603.CrossRefPubMed Patel, K. K., Veenstra, D. L., & Patrick, D. L. (2003). A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials. Value Health, 6(5), 595–603.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Szabo, S. (1996). WHOQOL Assessment Instrument. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd Ed. 355–362). Philadelphia: Lippincott and Raven. Szabo, S. (1996). WHOQOL Assessment Instrument. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd Ed. 355–362). Philadelphia: Lippincott and Raven.
49.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. M. (1996). The quality of well-being index. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven. Kaplan, R. M. (1996). The quality of well-being index. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
50.
go back to reference Camfield, L., & Ruta, D. (2007). ‘Translation is not enough’: using the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI) to assess individual quality of life in Bangladesh, Thailand, and Ethiopia. Quality of Life Research, 16(6), 1039–1051.CrossRefPubMed Camfield, L., & Ruta, D. (2007). ‘Translation is not enough’: using the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI) to assess individual quality of life in Bangladesh, Thailand, and Ethiopia. Quality of Life Research, 16(6), 1039–1051.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hanley, J. A., & Cohen, S. R. (2005). Using the patient generated Index to evaluate response shift post-stroke. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2247–2257.CrossRefPubMed Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hanley, J. A., & Cohen, S. R. (2005). Using the patient generated Index to evaluate response shift post-stroke. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2247–2257.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Kuspinar, A., Finch, L., Pickard, S., & Mayo, N. E. (2014). Using existing data to identify candidate items for a health state classification system in multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 23, 1445–1457.CrossRefPubMed Kuspinar, A., Finch, L., Pickard, S., & Mayo, N. E. (2014). Using existing data to identify candidate items for a health state classification system in multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 23, 1445–1457.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions
Auteurs
Nancy E. Mayo
Ala’ Aburub
Marie-Josée Brouillette
Ayse Kuspinar
Carolina Moriello
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Susan Scott
Publicatiedatum
17-12-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1480-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Quality of Life Research 3/2017 Naar de uitgave