Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness 4/2017

23-01-2017 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Improving the Precision of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Using a Rasch Approach

Auteurs: Oleg N. Medvedev, Richard J. Siegert, Paula Kersten, Christian U. Krägeloh

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 4/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Mindfulness has emerged as an important contributor to health and well-being, although its accurate assessment represents an ongoing challenge. The 39-item Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is a widely used measure of trait mindfulness that includes five subscales: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging, and non-reacting to inner experience. While the instrument has been shown to possess generally acceptable psychometric properties, no work so far has been conducted to increase the precision of the instrument and its subscales in discriminating between individual trait levels. The present study used Rasch analysis to assess the psychometric properties of the FFMQ using a sample of 296 participants, with the intention to improve the scale if necessary. The best fit to the Rasch model for all five FFMQ subscales and the total scale was achieved after minor modifications that involved combining locally dependent items into subtests and removing two items (24 and 32) that critically affected the goodness-of-fit indices. These findings support the psychometric properties and internal construct validity of the modified FFMQ, and ordinal-to-interval Rasch conversion tables are included here that can be used to increase the precision of measurement without requiring any modifications of the original FFMQ response format. These findings have implications for a wide range of areas where more accurate assessment of mindfulness and its facets is necessary.
Literatuur
go back to reference Andrich, D. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrica, 43, 561–573. CrossRef Andrich, D. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrica, 43, 561–573. CrossRef
go back to reference Andrich, D., Hagquist, C. (2015). Real and artificial differential item functioning in polytomous items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(2), 185–207. Andrich, D., Hagquist, C. (2015). Real and artificial differential item functioning in polytomous items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(2), 185–207.
go back to reference Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM 2030. Perth: RUMM Laboratory. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM 2030. Perth: RUMM Laboratory.
go back to reference Baer, R. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–142. Baer, R. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–142.
go back to reference Baer, R., Samuel, D. B., & Lykins, E. L. B. (2010). Differential item functioning on the five facet mindfulness questionnaire is minimal in demographically matched meditators and nonmeditators. Assessment, 20(10), 1–8. Baer, R., Samuel, D. B., & Lykins, E. L. B. (2010). Differential item functioning on the five facet mindfulness questionnaire is minimal in demographically matched meditators and nonmeditators. Assessment, 20(10), 1–8.
go back to reference Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. CrossRefPubMed Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Baer, R., Smith, G., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. CrossRefPubMed Baer, R., Smith, G., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Baer, R., Smith, G., Lykins, E. L. B., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. CrossRefPubMed Baer, R., Smith, G., Lykins, E. L. B., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brogden, H. E. (1977). The Rasch model, the law of comparative judgment and additive conjoint measurement. Psychometrika, 42(4), 631–634. CrossRef Brogden, H. E. (1977). The Rasch model, the law of comparative judgment and additive conjoint measurement. Psychometrika, 42(4), 631–634. CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. CrossRef Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. CrossRefPubMed Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cash, M., & Whittingham, K. (2010). What facets of mindfulness contribute to psychological well-being and depressive, anxious, and stress-related symptomatology? Mindfulness, 1(3), 177–182. CrossRef Cash, M., & Whittingham, K. (2010). What facets of mindfulness contribute to psychological well-being and depressive, anxious, and stress-related symptomatology? Mindfulness, 1(3), 177–182. CrossRef
go back to reference Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 451–455. CrossRefPubMed Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 451–455. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Mindfulness emotion regulation: an integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 560–572. CrossRefPubMed Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Mindfulness emotion regulation: an integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 560–572. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2010). A systematic review of neurobiological and clinical features of mindfulness meditations. Psychological Medicine, 40(8), 1239–1252. CrossRefPubMed Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2010). A systematic review of neurobiological and clinical features of mindfulness meditations. Psychological Medicine, 40(8), 1239–1252. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Christopher, M. S., Neuser, N. J., Michael, P. G., & Baitmangalkar, A. (2012). Exploring the psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3(2), 124–131. CrossRef Christopher, M. S., Neuser, N. J., Michael, P. G., & Baitmangalkar, A. (2012). Exploring the psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3(2), 124–131. CrossRef
go back to reference Fisak, B., & von Lehe, A. C. (2012). The relation between the five facets of mindfulness and worry in a non-clinical sample. Mindfulness, 3(1), 15–21. CrossRef Fisak, B., & von Lehe, A. C. (2012). The relation between the five facets of mindfulness and worry in a non-clinical sample. Mindfulness, 3(1), 15–21. CrossRef
go back to reference Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 255–262.Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., & Linehan, M. M. (Eds.). (2004). Mindfulness and acceptance: expanding cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York: The Guilford Press. Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 255–262.Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., & Linehan, M. M. (Eds.). (2004). Mindfulness and acceptance: expanding cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 13(12), 1–200. CrossRef Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 13(12), 1–200. CrossRef
go back to reference Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Inchausti, F., Prieto, G., & Delgado, A. R. (2014). Rasch analysis of the Spanish version of the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS) in a clinical sample. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 7(1), 32–41. CrossRefPubMed Inchausti, F., Prieto, G., & Delgado, A. R. (2014). Rasch analysis of the Spanish version of the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS) in a clinical sample. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 7(1), 32–41. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Josefsson, T., Lindwall, M., & Broberg, A. G. (2014). The effects of a short-term mindfulness based intervention on self-reported mindfulness, decentering, executive attention, psychological health, and coping style: examining unique mindfulness effects and mediators. Mindfulness, 5(1), 18–35. CrossRef Josefsson, T., Lindwall, M., & Broberg, A. G. (2014). The effects of a short-term mindfulness based intervention on self-reported mindfulness, decentering, executive attention, psychological health, and coping style: examining unique mindfulness effects and mediators. Mindfulness, 5(1), 18–35. CrossRef
go back to reference Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.
go back to reference Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7, 328. Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7, 328.
go back to reference Lundgren Nilsson, Å., & Tennant, A. (2011). Past and present issues in Rasch analysis: the functional independence measure (FIM™) revisited. Journal of Reabilitation Medicine, 43, 884–891. CrossRef Lundgren Nilsson, Å., & Tennant, A. (2011). Past and present issues in Rasch analysis: the functional independence measure (FIM™) revisited. Journal of Reabilitation Medicine, 43, 884–891. CrossRef
go back to reference Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Ahlborg, G., & Tennant, A. (2013). Construct validity of the psychological general well being index (PGWBI) in a sample of patients undergoing treatment for stress-related exhaustion: a Rasch analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 2. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Ahlborg, G., & Tennant, A. (2013). Construct validity of the psychological general well being index (PGWBI) in a sample of patients undergoing treatment for stress-related exhaustion: a Rasch analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 2. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Lyvers, M., Makin, C., Toms, E., Thorberg, F. A., & Samios, C. (2014). Trait mindfulness in relation to emotional self-regulation and executive function. Mindfulness, 5(6), 619–625. CrossRef Lyvers, M., Makin, C., Toms, E., Thorberg, F. A., & Samios, C. (2014). Trait mindfulness in relation to emotional self-regulation and executive function. Mindfulness, 5(6), 619–625. CrossRef
go back to reference Masters G., A. (1982) Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica, 47, 149–174. Masters G., A. (1982) Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica, 47, 149–174.
go back to reference Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Feng, X. J., Billington, D. R., Jang, J. Y., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2016a). Measuring trait mindfulness: how to improve the precision of the mindful attention awareness scale using a Rasch model. Mindfulness, 7(2), 384–395. CrossRef Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Feng, X. J., Billington, D. R., Jang, J. Y., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2016a). Measuring trait mindfulness: how to improve the precision of the mindful attention awareness scale using a Rasch model. Mindfulness, 7(2), 384–395. CrossRef
go back to reference Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Kersten, P., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2016b). Rasch analysis of the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Mindfulness, 7(2), 466–478. CrossRef Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Kersten, P., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2016b). Rasch analysis of the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Mindfulness, 7(2), 466–478. CrossRef
go back to reference Norquist, J. M., Fitzpatrick, R., Dawson, J., & Jenkinson, C. (2004). Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Medical Care, 42(1), I25–I36. PubMed Norquist, J. M., Fitzpatrick, R., Dawson, J., & Jenkinson, C. (2004). Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Medical Care, 42(1), I25–I36. PubMed
go back to reference Park, T., Reilly-Spong, M., & Gross, C. R. (2013). Mindfulness: a systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient-reported outcome (PRO). Quality of Life Research, 22(10), 2639–2659. CrossRefPubMed Park, T., Reilly-Spong, M., & Gross, C. R. (2013). Mindfulness: a systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient-reported outcome (PRO). Quality of Life Research, 22(10), 2639–2659. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pearson, M. R., Brown, D. B., Bravo, A. J., & Witkiewitz, K. (2015). Staying in the moment and finding purpose: the associations of trait mindfulness, decentering, and purpose in life with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and alcohol-related problems. Mindfulness, 6(3), 645–653. CrossRef Pearson, M. R., Brown, D. B., Bravo, A. J., & Witkiewitz, K. (2015). Staying in the moment and finding purpose: the associations of trait mindfulness, decentering, and purpose in life with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and alcohol-related problems. Mindfulness, 6(3), 645–653. CrossRef
go back to reference Penfield, R. D. (2007). An approach for categorizing DIF in polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 335–355. CrossRef Penfield, R. D. (2007). An approach for categorizing DIF in polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 335–355. CrossRef
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment test. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment test. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. University of California Press. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability., Berkeley, California. Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. University of California Press. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability., Berkeley, California.
go back to reference Sauer, S., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Ives, J., & Kohls, N. (2013). Specific objectivity of mindfulness—a Rasch analysis of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Mindfulness, 4(1), 45–54. CrossRef Sauer, S., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Ives, J., & Kohls, N. (2013). Specific objectivity of mindfulness—a Rasch analysis of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Mindfulness, 4(1), 45–54. CrossRef
go back to reference Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2013). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2013). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Siegert, R. J., Tennant, A., & Turner-Stokes, L. (2010). Rasch analysis of the Beck depression inventory-II in a neurological rehabilitation sample. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(1), 8–17. CrossRefPubMed Siegert, R. J., Tennant, A., & Turner-Stokes, L. (2010). Rasch analysis of the Beck depression inventory-II in a neurological rehabilitation sample. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(1), 8–17. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Smith, E. V. (2002). Detecting and evaluation the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 205–231. PubMed Smith, E. V. (2002). Detecting and evaluation the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 205–231. PubMed
go back to reference Statistics New Zealand. (2013). Census ethnic group profiles. Wellington: New Zealand Government. Statistics New Zealand. (2013). Census ethnic group profiles. Wellington: New Zealand Government.
go back to reference Stucki, G., Daltroy, L., Katz, J. N., Johannesson, M., & Liang, M. H. (1996). Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: the whole may not equal the sum of the parts. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(7), 711–717. CrossRefPubMed Stucki, G., Daltroy, L., Katz, J. N., Johannesson, M., & Liang, M. H. (1996). Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: the whole may not equal the sum of the parts. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(7), 711–717. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis & Rheumatism, 57(8), 1358–1362. CrossRef Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis & Rheumatism, 57(8), 1358–1362. CrossRef
go back to reference Tennant, A., & Pallant, J. F. (2006). Unidimensionality matters! (a tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20, 1048–1051. Tennant, A., & Pallant, J. F. (2006). Unidimensionality matters! (a tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20, 1048–1051.
go back to reference Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2009). Differential item function across meditators and non-meditators on the five facet mindfulness questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 516–521. CrossRef Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2009). Differential item function across meditators and non-meditators on the five facet mindfulness questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 516–521. CrossRef
go back to reference Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185–201. CrossRef Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185–201. CrossRef
go back to reference Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. CrossRef Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. CrossRef
go back to reference Zoogman, S., Goldberg, S. B., Hoyt, W. T., & Miller, L. (2015). Mindfulness interventions with youth: a meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 6(2), 290–302. CrossRef Zoogman, S., Goldberg, S. B., Hoyt, W. T., & Miller, L. (2015). Mindfulness interventions with youth: a meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 6(2), 290–302. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Improving the Precision of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Using a Rasch Approach
Auteurs
Oleg N. Medvedev
Richard J. Siegert
Paula Kersten
Christian U. Krägeloh
Publicatiedatum
23-01-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0676-8