Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Many children with autism show very little interest in academic assignments and exhibit disruptive behavior when assignments are presented. Research indicates that incorporating specific motivational variables such as choice, interspersal of maintenance tasks, and natural reinforcers during intervention leads to improvements in core symptoms of autism and may possibly be effective in academic areas. Using a multiple baseline across children and behaviors design with four pre- and elementary school children with autism, we assessed whether the above variables could be incorporated into academic tasks to improve performance and interest. Results indicated that the intervention decreased the children’s latency to begin academic tasks, improved their rate of performance and interest, and decreased their disruptive behavior. Theoretical and applied implications are discussed.
Baumgartner, D., Bryan, T., Donahue, M., & Nelson, C. (1993). Thanks for asking: Parent comments about homework, tests, and grades. Exceptionality, 4, 177–185. CrossRef
Bowman, B. T., Donovan, S., & Burns, M. S. (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single case research. In T. Kratochwill & J. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Carr, T., Ribinson, S., & Palumbo, L. W. (1990). The wrong issue: Aversive versus nonaversive treatment. The right issue: Functional versus nonfunctional treatment. In A. C. Repp & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Persepctives in the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 361–379). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variance and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children. The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 41–64. CrossRef
Gunter, P. L., Denny, R. K., Jack, S. L., Shores, R. E., & Nelson, C. M. (1994). Aversive stimuli in academic interactions between students with serious emotional disturbance and their teachers. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 265–274.
Harrower, J. (1999). Educational inclusion of children with severe disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 1, 215–230. CrossRef
Harrower, J., & Dunlap, G. (2001). Including children with autism in general education classrooms. Behavior Modifications, 25, 762–784. CrossRef
Hinton, L., & Kern, L. (1999). Increasing homework completion by incorporating student interests. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(4), 231–241. CrossRef
House, R. (2002). Loving to learn: Protecting a natural impulse in a technocratic world. Paths of learning: Options for families & communities, 12, 32–36.
Koegel, R., Tran, Q., Mossman, A., & Koegel, L. (1994). Incorporating motivational procedures to improve homework performance. In R. Koegel & L. Koegel (Eds.), Pivotal response treatments for Autism (pp. 81–91). Baltimore, ML: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Machalicek, W., O’Reilly, M. F., Beretvas, M., Sigafoos, J., & Lancioni, G. E. (2007). A review of interventions to reduce challenging behavior in school settings for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 229–246. CrossRef
Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T., Solomon, O., & Sirota, K. (2001). Inclusion as social practice: Views of children with autism. Social Development, 10(3), 399–419. CrossRef
Patton, J. R., Jayanthi, M., & Polloway, E. A. (2001). Home-school collaboration about homework: What do we know and what should we do? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 17, 227–242.
- Improving Motivation for Academics in Children with Autism
Lynn Kern Koegel
Anjileen K. Singh
Robert L. Koegel
- Springer US