Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2017

21-12-2016

Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy

Auteurs: Samuli Aspinen, Jari Kärkkäinen, Jukka Harju, Petri Juvonen, Hannu Kokki, Matti Eskelinen

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The assessment of the quality of life (QoL) in minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with the ultrasonic dissection in both groups has not been addressed earlier.

Methods

Initially, 109 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized to undergo either MC (n = 59) or LC (n = 50). RAND-36 survey was conducted preoperatively and at 4 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. The end point of our study was to determine differences in health status in MC versus LC groups.

Results

QoL improved significantly in both groups, and the recovery was similar in the two groups, except from the higher score in ‘health change’ subscale at 4 weeks in MC group [MC score 75.0 (25.0) vs. LC score 56.5 (23.2), p = 0.008]. The MC and LC groups combined, RAND-36 scores increased significantly in ‘physical functioning’ [combined mean (SD) preoperative score 80.5 (23.9) vs. 6-month postoperative score 86.5 (21.7), p = 0.015], ‘vitality’ [64.5 (19.2) vs. 73.5 (18.3), p = 0.001], ‘health change’ [43.0 (21.6) vs. 74.6 (25.4), p = 0.0001] and ‘bodily pain’ scores [57.7 (26.3) vs. 75.5 (25.5), p = 0.001], respectively. Four RAND-36 domains indicated statistically significant health status differences in comparing the preoperative and postoperative RAND-36 scores in LC and MC groups combined.

Conclusions

Four RAND-36 domains indicated a significant positive change in QoL after cholecystectomy.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Ledet, W. P., Jr. (1990). Ambulatory cholecystectomy without disability. Archives of Surgery, 125, 1434–1435.CrossRefPubMed Ledet, W. P., Jr. (1990). Ambulatory cholecystectomy without disability. Archives of Surgery, 125, 1434–1435.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Barkun, J. S., Barkun, A. N., Sampalis, J. S., et al. (1992). Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet, 340, 1116–1119.PubMed Barkun, J. S., Barkun, A. N., Sampalis, J. S., et al. (1992). Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet, 340, 1116–1119.PubMed
3.
go back to reference McMahon, A. J., Russell, I. T., Baxter, J. N., et al. (1994). Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: A randomised trial. Lancet, 343, 135–138.CrossRefPubMed McMahon, A. J., Russell, I. T., Baxter, J. N., et al. (1994). Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: A randomised trial. Lancet, 343, 135–138.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tyagi, N. S., Meredith, M. C., Lumb, J. C., et al. (1994). A new minimal invasive technique for cholecystectomy: Subxiphoid “minimal stress triangle” microceliotomy. Annals of Surgery, 220, 617–625.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tyagi, N. S., Meredith, M. C., Lumb, J. C., et al. (1994). A new minimal invasive technique for cholecystectomy: Subxiphoid “minimal stress triangle” microceliotomy. Annals of Surgery, 220, 617–625.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference McGinn, F. P., Miles, A. J., Uqlow, M., et al. (1995). Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 82, 1374–1377.CrossRefPubMed McGinn, F. P., Miles, A. J., Uqlow, M., et al. (1995). Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 82, 1374–1377.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Majeed, A. W., Troy, G., Nicholl, J. P., et al. (1996). Randomized, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet, 347, 989–994.CrossRefPubMed Majeed, A. W., Troy, G., Nicholl, J. P., et al. (1996). Randomized, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet, 347, 989–994.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Squirrell, D. M., Majeed, A. W., Troy, G., et al. (1998). A randomized, prospective, blinded comparison of postoperative pain, metabolic response, and perceived health after laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy. Surgery, 123, 485–495.CrossRefPubMed Squirrell, D. M., Majeed, A. W., Troy, G., et al. (1998). A randomized, prospective, blinded comparison of postoperative pain, metabolic response, and perceived health after laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy. Surgery, 123, 485–495.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Seale, A. K., & Ledet, W. P., Jr. (1999). Minicholecystectomy: A safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure. Archives of Surgery, 134, 308–310.CrossRefPubMed Seale, A. K., & Ledet, W. P., Jr. (1999). Minicholecystectomy: A safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure. Archives of Surgery, 134, 308–310.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ros, A., Gustafsson, L., Krook, H., et al. (2001). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Annals of Surgery, 234, 741–749.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ros, A., Gustafsson, L., Krook, H., et al. (2001). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Annals of Surgery, 234, 741–749.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Srivastava, A., Srinivas, G., Misra, M. C., et al. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. A randomized trial. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 17, 497–502.PubMed Srivastava, A., Srinivas, G., Misra, M. C., et al. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. A randomized trial. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 17, 497–502.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Thomas, S., Singh, J., Bishnoi, P. K., et al. (2001). Feasibility of day-care open cholecystectomy: Evaluation in an inpatient model. ANZ J Surg, 71, 93–97.CrossRefPubMed Thomas, S., Singh, J., Bishnoi, P. K., et al. (2001). Feasibility of day-care open cholecystectomy: Evaluation in an inpatient model. ANZ J Surg, 71, 93–97.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Amjad, N., & Fazal, A. (2002). Mini cholecystectomy now a day stay surgery: Anaesthetic management with multi modal analgesia. J Pak Med Assoc, 52, 291–296.PubMed Amjad, N., & Fazal, A. (2002). Mini cholecystectomy now a day stay surgery: Anaesthetic management with multi modal analgesia. J Pak Med Assoc, 52, 291–296.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Harju, J., Juvonen, P., Eskelinen, M., et al. (2006). Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized study with special reference to obesity. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 583–586.CrossRefPubMed Harju, J., Juvonen, P., Eskelinen, M., et al. (2006). Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized study with special reference to obesity. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 583–586.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Vagenas, K., Spyrakopoulos, P., Karanikolas, M., et al. (2006). Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which way to go? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 16, 321–324.CrossRefPubMed Vagenas, K., Spyrakopoulos, P., Karanikolas, M., et al. (2006). Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which way to go? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 16, 321–324.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Harju, J., Pääkkönen, M., & Eskelinen, M. (2007). Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: A prospective clinical pilot study. Scand J Surg, 96, 206–208.CrossRefPubMed Harju, J., Pääkkönen, M., & Eskelinen, M. (2007). Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: A prospective clinical pilot study. Scand J Surg, 96, 206–208.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Harju, J., Pääkkönen, M., & Eskelinen, M. (2007). Comparison of the quality of life after minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized study. Isr Med Assoc J, 9, 147–148.PubMed Harju, J., Pääkkönen, M., & Eskelinen, M. (2007). Comparison of the quality of life after minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized study. Isr Med Assoc J, 9, 147–148.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Keus, F., de Vries, J., Gooszen, H. G., et al. (2008). Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: Health status in a blind randomised trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 22, 1649–1659.CrossRefPubMed Keus, F., de Vries, J., Gooszen, H. G., et al. (2008). Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: Health status in a blind randomised trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 22, 1649–1659.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Harju, J., Kokki, H., Pääkkönen, M., et al. (2010). Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: A prospective randomized study. Scand J Surg, 99, 132–136.CrossRefPubMed Harju, J., Kokki, H., Pääkkönen, M., et al. (2010). Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: A prospective randomized study. Scand J Surg, 99, 132–136.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rosenmuller, M. H., Thoren Örnberg, M., Myrnäs, T., et al. (2013). Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 100, 886–894.CrossRefPubMed Rosenmuller, M. H., Thoren Örnberg, M., Myrnäs, T., et al. (2013). Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 100, 886–894.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Harju, J., Juvonen, P., Kokki, H., et al. (2013). Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with electrosurgical energy: A randomized multicenter study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 48, 1317–1323.CrossRefPubMed Harju, J., Juvonen, P., Kokki, H., et al. (2013). Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with electrosurgical energy: A randomized multicenter study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 48, 1317–1323.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Harju, J., Aspinen, S., Juvonen, P., et al. (2013). Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 27, 2512–2516.CrossRefPubMed Harju, J., Aspinen, S., Juvonen, P., et al. (2013). Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 27, 2512–2516.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Aspinen, S., Harju, J., Juvonen, P., et al. (2014). A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome. Surgical Endoscopy, 28, 827–832.CrossRefPubMed Aspinen, S., Harju, J., Juvonen, P., et al. (2014). A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome. Surgical Endoscopy, 28, 827–832.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Aspinen, S., Harju, J., Juvonen, P., et al. (2014). A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection as day surgery procedure—1-year outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 49, 1336–1342.PubMed Aspinen, S., Harju, J., Juvonen, P., et al. (2014). A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection as day surgery procedure—1-year outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 49, 1336–1342.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Aspinen, S., Harju, J., Kinnunen, M., et al. (2016). A randomized multicenter study of minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection in both groups. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 51, 354–359.CrossRefPubMed Aspinen, S., Harju, J., Kinnunen, M., et al. (2016). A randomized multicenter study of minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection in both groups. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 51, 354–359.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Aspinen, S., Kinnunen, M., Harju, J., et al. (2016). Inflammatory response to surgical trauma in patients with minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised multicentre study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 51, 739–744.CrossRefPubMed Aspinen, S., Kinnunen, M., Harju, J., et al. (2016). Inflammatory response to surgical trauma in patients with minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised multicentre study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 51, 739–744.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Korolija, D., Sauerland, S., Wood-Dauphinée, S., et al. (2004). Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: Evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 18, 879–897.CrossRefPubMed Korolija, D., Sauerland, S., Wood-Dauphinée, S., et al. (2004). Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: Evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 18, 879–897.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Purkayastha, S., Tilney, H. S., Georgiou, P., et al. (2007). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Surgical Endoscopy, 21, 1294–1300.CrossRefPubMed Purkayastha, S., Tilney, H. S., Georgiou, P., et al. (2007). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Surgical Endoscopy, 21, 1294–1300.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Keus, F., Gooszen, H. G., & van Laarhoven, C. J. (2009). Systematic review: Open, small-incision or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 29, 359–378.CrossRef Keus, F., Gooszen, H. G., & van Laarhoven, C. J. (2009). Systematic review: Open, small-incision or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 29, 359–378.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Califano, A. D., Angelini, P., et al. (2011). Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a pilot randomized trial. American Journal of Surgery, 202, 45–52.CrossRefPubMed Califano, A. D., Angelini, P., et al. (2011). Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a pilot randomized trial. American Journal of Surgery, 202, 45–52.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wright, B., Alexander, D., Aghahoseini, A., et al. (2016). Does preoperative depression and/or serotonin transporter gene polymorphism predict outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? BMJ open, 6, e007969.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright, B., Alexander, D., Aghahoseini, A., et al. (2016). Does preoperative depression and/or serotonin transporter gene polymorphism predict outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? BMJ open, 6, e007969.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Hays, R. D., & Morales, L. S. (2001). The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Annals of Medicine, 33, 350–357.CrossRefPubMed Hays, R. D., & Morales, L. S. (2001). The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Annals of Medicine, 33, 350–357.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Aalto, A.-M., Aro, A. R., & Teperi, J. (1999). Rand-36 as a measure of health-related quality of life. Reliability, construct validity and reference values in the Finnish general population. Helsinki: National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health. (Research #101 In Finnish, summary in English). Aalto, A.-M., Aro, A. R., & Teperi, J. (1999). Rand-36 as a measure of health-related quality of life. Reliability, construct validity and reference values in the Finnish general population. Helsinki: National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health. (Research #101 In Finnish, summary in English).
Metagegevens
Titel
Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy
Auteurs
Samuli Aspinen
Jari Kärkkäinen
Jukka Harju
Petri Juvonen
Hannu Kokki
Matti Eskelinen
Publicatiedatum
21-12-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1485-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Quality of Life Research 3/2017 Naar de uitgave