Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Article

Implicit sequence learning in a continuous pursuit-tracking task

Auteurs: Alexandre Lang, Olivier Gapenne, Dominique Aubert, Carole Ferrel-Chapus

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Assessing implicit learning in the continuous pursuit-tracking task usually concerns a repeated segment of target displacements masked by two random segments, as referred to as Pew’s paradigm. Evidence for segment learning in this paradigm is scanty and contrasts with robust sequence learning in discrete tracking tasks. The present study investigates this issue with two experiments in which participants (N = 56) performed a continuous tracking task. Contrary to Pew’s paradigm, participants were presented with a training sequence that was continuously cycled during 14 blocks of practice, but Block 12 in which a transfer sequence was introduced. Results demonstrate sequence learning in several conditions except in the condition that was obviously the most similar to previous studies failing to induce segment learning. Specifically, it is shown here that a target moving too slowly combined with variable time at which target reversal occurs prevents sequence learning. In addition, data from a post-experimental recognition test indicate that sequence learning was associated with explicit perceptual knowledge about the repetitive structure. We propose that learning repetition in a continuous tracking task is conditional on its capacity to (1) allow participants to detect the repeated regularities and (2) restrict feedback-based tracking strategies.
Literatuur
go back to reference Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 51–72.CrossRef Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 51–72.CrossRef
go back to reference Chambaron, S., Ginhac, D., Ferrel-Chapus, C., & Perruchet, P. (2006). Implicit learning of a repeated segment in a continuous tracking: A reappraisal. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 845–854.CrossRef Chambaron, S., Ginhac, D., Ferrel-Chapus, C., & Perruchet, P. (2006). Implicit learning of a repeated segment in a continuous tracking: A reappraisal. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 845–854.CrossRef
go back to reference Chambaron, S., Ginhac, D., & Perruchet, P. (2008). Is learning in SRT tasks robust across methodological variations? L’Année Psychologique, 108, 465–486.CrossRef Chambaron, S., Ginhac, D., & Perruchet, P. (2008). Is learning in SRT tasks robust across methodological variations? L’Année Psychologique, 108, 465–486.CrossRef
go back to reference Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406–416.PubMedCrossRef Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406–416.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17–30.CrossRef Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343–350.CrossRef Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343–350.CrossRef
go back to reference Lang, A., Gapenne, O., & Rovira, K. (2011). Questioning implicit motor learning as instantiated by the pursuit tracking task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(10), 2003–2011.CrossRef Lang, A., Gapenne, O., & Rovira, K. (2011). Questioning implicit motor learning as instantiated by the pursuit tracking task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(10), 2003–2011.CrossRef
go back to reference Magill, R. A. (1998). Knowledge is more than we can talk about: Implicit learning in motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 104–110.PubMedCrossRef Magill, R. A. (1998). Knowledge is more than we can talk about: Implicit learning in motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 104–110.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirement of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirement of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Perruchet, P. (2008). Implicit learning. In H. L. Roediger III (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (Vol. 2, pp. 597–621). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRef Perruchet, P. (2008). Implicit learning. In H. L. Roediger III (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (Vol. 2, pp. 597–621). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRef
go back to reference Perruchet, P., & Amorim, M.-A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 785–800.PubMedCrossRef Perruchet, P., & Amorim, M.-A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 785–800.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Perruchet, P., Chambaron, S., & Ferrel-Chapus, C. (2003). Learning from implicit learning literature: Comment on Shea, Wulf, Whitacre, and Park (2001). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 769–778. Perruchet, P., Chambaron, S., & Ferrel-Chapus, C. (2003). Learning from implicit learning literature: Comment on Shea, Wulf, Whitacre, and Park (2001). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 769–778.
go back to reference Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–388.PubMed Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–388.PubMed
go back to reference Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 585–594.CrossRef Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 585–594.CrossRef
go back to reference Roberston, E. M. (2007). The serial reaction time task: Implicit motor skill learning? The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 10073–10075.CrossRef Roberston, E. M. (2007). The serial reaction time task: Implicit motor skill learning? The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 10073–10075.CrossRef
go back to reference Shanks, D. R., & Channon, S. (2002). Effects of a secondary task on ‘‘implicit’’ sequence learning: Learning or performance? Psychological Research, 66, 99–109.PubMedCrossRef Shanks, D. R., & Channon, S. (2002). Effects of a secondary task on ‘‘implicit’’ sequence learning: Learning or performance? Psychological Research, 66, 99–109.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shanks, D. R., Rowland, L. A., & Ranger, M. S. (2005a). Attentional load and implicit sequence learning. Psychological Research, 69, 369–382.PubMedCrossRef Shanks, D. R., Rowland, L. A., & Ranger, M. S. (2005a). Attentional load and implicit sequence learning. Psychological Research, 69, 369–382.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.CrossRef Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.CrossRef
go back to reference Shanks, D. R., Rowland, L. A., & Ranger, M. S. (2005b). Attentional load and implicit sequence learning. Psychological Research, 69, 369–382.PubMedCrossRef Shanks, D. R., Rowland, L. A., & Ranger, M. S. (2005b). Attentional load and implicit sequence learning. Psychological Research, 69, 369–382.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shea, C., Wulf, G., Whitacre, C. A., & Park, J. (2001). Surfing the implicit wave. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 841–862. Shea, C., Wulf, G., Whitacre, C. A., & Park, J. (2001). Surfing the implicit wave. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 841–862.
go back to reference Wilkinson, L., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 354–369.PubMedCrossRef Wilkinson, L., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 354–369.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wulf, G. (2007). Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 10 years of research. E-Journal Bewegung und Training, 1, 4–14. Wulf, G. (2007). Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 10 years of research. E-Journal Bewegung und Training, 1, 4–14.
go back to reference Wulf, G., Hoss, M., & Prinz, W. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 169–179.PubMedCrossRef Wulf, G., Hoss, M., & Prinz, W. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 169–179.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 987–1006.CrossRef Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 987–1006.CrossRef
go back to reference Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad and the ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 121–144). London: Routledge. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad and the ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 121–144). London: Routledge.
Metagegevens
Titel
Implicit sequence learning in a continuous pursuit-tracking task
Auteurs
Alexandre Lang
Olivier Gapenne
Dominique Aubert
Carole Ferrel-Chapus
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0460-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2013

Psychological Research 5/2013 Naar de uitgave