Top

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Gepubliceerd in:

01-01-2010 | Original Paper

Impaired Competence for Pretense in Children with Autism: Exploring Potential Cognitive Predictors

Auteur: Sally Bigham

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 1/2010

Abstract

Lack of pretense in children with autism has been explained by a number of theoretical explanations, including impaired mentalising, impaired response inhibition, and weak central coherence. This study aimed to empirically test each of these theories. Children with autism (n = 60) were significantly impaired relative to controls (n = 65) when interpreting pretense, thereby supporting a competence deficit hypothesis. They also showed impaired mentalising and response inhibition, but superior local processing indicating weak central coherence. Regression analyses revealed that mentalising significantly and independently predicted pretense. The results are interpreted as supporting the impaired mentalising theory and evidence against competing theories invoking impaired response inhibition or a local processing bias. The results of this study have important implications for treatment and intervention.

vorige artikel Increased White Matter Gyral Depth in Dyslexia: Implications for Corticocortical Connectivity

volgende artikel Unimpaired Perception of Social and Physical Causality, but Impaired Perception of Animacy in High Functioning Children with Autism

The term “metarepresentation” has been used to refer to different representational abilities. In referring to the ability to represent a representation, the term “secondary” representation (as used by Perner 1991) is used throughout this paper.

Preliminary analyses indicated that performances within groups did not differ significantly between the self- and other-false belief tests therefore all between groups analyses were performed on a self- + other-false belief composite score.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revised) (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: APA.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1987). Autism and symbolic play. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 139–148.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.CrossRefPubMed

Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Baird, G., Swettenham, J., Nightingale, N., Morgan, K., et al. (1996). Psychological markers of autism at 18 months of age in a large population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 158–163.CrossRefPubMed

Bigham, S. (2008). Comprehension of pretence in children with autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 265–280.CrossRef

Bigham, S., & Bourchier-Sutton, A. (2007). The decontextualization of form and function in the development of pretence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 335–351.CrossRef

Boucher, J. (2009). The autistic spectrum: Characteristics, causes and practical issues. London: Sage.

Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Haight, W., & Miller, P. J. (1992). The development of everyday pretend play: A longitudinal study of mothers’ participation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(3), 331–349.

Happé, F., & Booth, R. (2008). The power of the positive: Revisiting weak coherence in autism spectrum disorders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 50–63.CrossRefPubMed

Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5–25.CrossRefPubMed

Harris, P. L. (1993). Pretending and planning. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 228–246). Oxford: Oxford university press.

Hughes, C. (1996). Control of action and thought: Normal development and dysfunction in autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(2), 229–236.CrossRefPubMed

Jarrold, C. (2003). A review of research into pretend play in autism. Autism, 7(4), 379–390.CrossRefPubMed

Jarrold, C., Boucher, J., & Smith, P. K. (1994a). Executive function deficits and the pretend play of children with autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(8), 1473–1482.CrossRefPubMed

Jarrold, C., Butler, D. W., Cottington, E. M., & Jimenez, F. (2000). Linking theory of mind and central coherence bias in autism and in the general population. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 126–138.CrossRefPubMed

Jarrold, C., Smith, P. K., Boucher, J., & Harris, P. L. (1994b). Comprehension of pretense in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 433–455.CrossRefPubMed

Kavanaugh, R. D., & Harris, P. L. (1994). Imagining the outcome of pretend transformations: Assessing the competence of normal children and children with autism. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 847–854.CrossRef

Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “Theory of Mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.CrossRef

Leslie, A. M., & Polizzi, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: Two conjectures. Developmental Science, 1(2), 247–253.CrossRef

Leslie, A. M., & Roth, D. (1993). What autism teaches us about metarepresentation. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds (pp. 83–111). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, V., & Boucher, J. (1988). Spontaneous, instructed and elicited play in relatively able autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 325–339.

Lillard, A. S. (2002). Pretend play and cognitive development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive development (pp. 188–205). London: Blackwell.CrossRef

Miller, G., & Chapman, J. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 40–48.CrossRefPubMed

Morgan, B., Maybery, M., & Durkin, K. (2003). Weak central coherence, poor joint attention, and low verbal ability: Independent deficits in early autism. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 646–656.CrossRefPubMed

Mottron, L., Burack, J., Stauder, J., & Robaey, P. (1999). Perceptual processing among high-functioning persons with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(2), 203–211.CrossRefPubMed

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. MIT Press

Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekham, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child’s theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 60, 689–700.CrossRef

Ricks, D. M., & Wing, L. (1975). Language, communication, and the use of symbols in normal and autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5, 191–221.CrossRef

Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (1999). Social-cognitive development in the first year. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rutherford, M. D., Young, G. S., Hepburn, S., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). A longitudinal study of pretend play in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1024–1039.CrossRefPubMed

Suddendorf, T., Fletcher-Flinn, C., & Johnston, L. (1999). Pantomime and theory of mind. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(1), 31–45.CrossRef

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.

Taylor, M., & Carlson, S. M. (1997). The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind. Child Development, 68(3), 436–455.CrossRefPubMed

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.CrossRefPubMed

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Titel: Impaired Competence for Pretense in Children with Autism: Exploring Potential Cognitive Predictors
Auteur: Sally Bigham
Publicatiedatum: 01-01-2010
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0820-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2010

R. Janney and M.E. Snell: Behavioral Support: Teachers’ Guides to Inclusive Practices (Second Edition)

Book review

Responses to Nonverbal Behaviour of Dynamic Virtual Characters in High-Functioning Autism

Original Paper

Sensory Processing Subtypes in Autism: Association with Adaptive Behavior

Original Paper

ABA Versus TEACCH: The Case for Defining and Validating Comprehensive Treatment Models in Autism

Original Paper

Brief Report: Perception and Lateralization of Spoken Emotion by Youths with High-Functioning Forms of Autism

Brief Report

Vera Bernard-Opitz: Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Structured Teaching and Experience-Based Program for Therapists, Teachers, and Parents

Book Review