Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The aim was to examine the impact of the dyadic, interaction and dissimilarity effects of the illness representations on the psychological health of recently diagnosed cancer patients and spouses in Greece. The sample consisted of 298 individuals nested in 149 couples. Effects were examined with the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model. Both actor (i.e., within person) and partner (i.e., between partners) effects were detected for both patients’ and spouses’ psychological symptoms. The negative association of patients’ psychological symptoms with their representations of illness coherence was weak at the higher and medium levels, and stronger at the lower levels of spouse corresponding representations. Patient–partner discrepancy in perceived illness consequences was associated with more psychological symptoms in patients. Adaptation to cancer is a dyadic process within the context of which patient and partner psychological well-being is affected by each other’s understanding of illness. Thus, the parallel examination of the illness representations of both partners is needed from the early phases of the illness trajectory.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Applebaum, A., & Breitbart, W. (2013). Care for the cancer caregiver: A systematic review. Palliative & Supportive Care, 11, 231–252. CrossRef
Baum, A., & Andersen, B. L. (2001). Psychosocial interventions for cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Benyamini, Y., Medalion, B., & Garfinkel, D. (2007). Patient and spouse perceptions of the patient’s heart disease and their associations with received and provided social support and undermining. Psychology and Health, 22, 765–785. CrossRef
Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101–109. CrossRef
Figueiras, M. J., & Weinman, J. (2003). Do similar patient and spouse perceptions of myocardial infarction predict recovery? Psychology and Health, 18, 201–216. CrossRef
Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Kagitcibasi, C., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2006). Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Given, B., Kozachik, S., Collins, C., Devoss, D., & Given, C. W. (2001). Caregiver role strain. In M. Maas, K. Buckwalter, M. Hardy, T. Tripp-Reimer, & M. Titler (Eds.), Nursing care of older adults diagnosis: Outcome and interventions (pp. 679–695). St Louis, MO: Mosby.
Hagger, M. S., & Orbell, S. (2003). A meta-analytic review of the Common-Sense Model of illness representations. Psychology and Health, 18, 41–184. CrossRef
Heijmans, M., de Ridder, D., & Bensing, J. (1999). Dissimilarity in patients’ and spouses’ representations of chronic illness: Explorations of relations to patient adaptation. Psychology and Health, 14, 51–466. CrossRef
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Kafetsios, K., & Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Emotion and support perceptions in everyday social interaction: Testing the “less is more” hypothesis in two cultures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 165–184. CrossRef
Karademas, E. C., & Giannousi, Z. (2013). Representations of control and psychological symptoms in couples dealing with cancer: A dyadic-regulation approach. Psychology and Health, 28, 7–83. CrossRef
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
Leventhal, H., Diefenbach, M., & Leventhal, E. A. (1992). Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition treatment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 223–230. CrossRef
Leventhal, H., Halm, E., Horowitz, C., Leventhal, E. A., & Ozakinci, G. (2005). Living with chronic illness: A contextualized, self-regulation approach. In S. Sutton, A. Baum, & M. Johnston (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of health psychology (pp. 197–240). London: Sage.
Leventhal, H., Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common-sense representations of illness danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Medical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 7–30). New York: Pergamon.
Manne, S. L., & Ostroff, J. S. (2008). Coping with breast cancer: A couples-focused group intervention. Therapist guide. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Martin, R., & Leventhal, H. (2004). Symptom perception and health care-seeking behavior. In T. J. Boll, J. M. Raczynski, & L. C. Leviton (Eds.), Handbook of clinical health psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 299–328). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Moss-Morris, R., Weinman, J., Petrie, K. J., Horne, R., & Cameron, L. D. (2002). The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychology and Health, 17, 1–16. CrossRef
Weinman, J., Heijmans, M., & Figueiras, M. J. (2003). Carer perceptions of chronic illness. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour (pp. 207–219). New York: Routledge.
- Illness representations and psychological adjustment of Greek couples dealing with a recently-diagnosed cancer: dyadic, interaction and perception-dissimilarity effects
Evangelos C. Karademas
- Springer US