Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Article

Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing

Auteurs: Davood G. Gozli, Stephanie C. Goodhew, Joshua B. Moskowitz, Jay Pratt

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The ideomotor theory of action posits that the cognitive representation of an action includes the learned perceptual effects of the action. Support for this theory has come from studies demonstrating how perceptual features that match the outcome of a response can facilitate selection of that response. We investigated another, complementary implication of ideomotor theory: would a bias toward selecting a response result in a perceptual bias toward the known effect of the response? In other words, would an action tendency direct attention to the anticipated perceptual features? Through an initial acquisition phase, participants learned that two possible responses (left/right keypress) consistently produced two distinct colors. Next, in a test phase, we manipulated response bias at the beginning of each trial, using an uninformative spatial prime presented at the left or right periphery. We then examined the extent to which color transients that either matched or mismatched the induced response bias can orient participants’ visual attention. Results revealed a perceptual bias toward the color effect of the primed response, manifested in a stronger visual orienting toward this color. Thus, biasing response selection can bias perception. These findings extend the scope of the ideomotor theory to visual perceptual processes.
Voetnoten
1
Applying this outlier-exclusion criterion to the RT data did not affect the pattern of findings in either of the experiments.
 
2
We thank Ulrich Ansorge for suggesting this possibility.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427–432.PubMedCrossRef Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427–432.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183–218). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183–218). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
go back to reference Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.PubMedCrossRef Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370–374.PubMedCrossRef Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370–374.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brown, L. E., Moore, C. M., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2002). Feature-specific perceptual processing dissociates action from recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1330–1344.PubMedCrossRef Brown, L. E., Moore, C. M., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2002). Feature-specific perceptual processing dissociates action from recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1330–1344.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbaek, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112, 291–328.PubMedCrossRef Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbaek, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112, 291–328.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45–73.CrossRef Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101.PubMedCrossRef Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Colzato, L. S., Warrens, M. J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Priming and binding in and across perception and action: a correlational analysis of the internal structure of event files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1785–1804.CrossRef Colzato, L. S., Warrens, M. J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Priming and binding in and across perception and action: a correlational analysis of the internal structure of event files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1785–1804.CrossRef
go back to reference Cousineau, D. (2007). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45. Cousineau, D. (2007). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
go back to reference Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1999). Action for perception: a motor-visual attention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673–1692.PubMedCrossRef Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1999). Action for perception: a motor-visual attention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673–1692.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect of anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.PubMedCrossRef Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect of anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.PubMedCrossRef Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fournier, L. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Bowd, C. (1998). Multiple-feature discrimination faster than single-feature discrimination within the same object. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1384–1405.CrossRef Fournier, L. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Bowd, C. (1998). Multiple-feature discrimination faster than single-feature discrimination within the same object. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1384–1405.CrossRef
go back to reference Gozli, D. G., & Pratt, J. (2011). Seeing while acting: hand movements can modulate attention capture by motion onset. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 2448–2456.CrossRef Gozli, D. G., & Pratt, J. (2011). Seeing while acting: hand movements can modulate attention capture by motion onset. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 2448–2456.CrossRef
go back to reference Gozli, D. G., & Pratt, J. (2012). Attentional repulsion effect despite a color-based control set. Visual Cognition, 20, 696–716.CrossRef Gozli, D. G., & Pratt, J. (2012). Attentional repulsion effect despite a color-based control set. Visual Cognition, 20, 696–716.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus–response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus–response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus–response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus–response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus – response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus – response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2004). Coloring an action: intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect. Psychological Research, 68, 74–90.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B. (2004). Coloring an action: intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect. Psychological Research, 68, 74–90.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. J. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: a new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 121–140). Cambridge: MIT Press. Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. J. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: a new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 121–140). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483–521.CrossRef Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483–521.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392–420.CrossRef Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392–420.CrossRef
go back to reference Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194–203.PubMedCrossRef Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194–203.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference James, W. (1890).The Principles of Psychology: Vol. 2. New York, NY: Holt & Co. James, W. (1890).The Principles of Psychology: Vol. 2. New York, NY: Holt & Co.
go back to reference Knudsen, E. I. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 57–78.PubMedCrossRef Knudsen, E. I. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 57–78.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1297–1303.CrossRef Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1297–1303.CrossRef
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.PubMedCrossRef Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387–394.PubMedCrossRef Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387–394.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kunde, W., & Stöcker, C. (2002).A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 581–592. Kunde, W., & Stöcker, C. (2002).A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 581–592.
go back to reference Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2004). Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli. Psychological Research, 68, 199–207.PubMed Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2004). Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli. Psychological Research, 68, 199–207.PubMed
go back to reference Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.CrossRef Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.CrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J. (1999). How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more equally-ranked crosstalks. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (advances in psychology) (Vol. 129, pp. 121–147). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef Müsseler, J. (1999). How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more equally-ranked crosstalks. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (advances in psychology) (Vol. 129, pp. 121–147). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.PubMedCrossRef Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 137–154. Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 137–154.
go back to reference Müsseler, J., Wühr, P., Danielmeier, C., & Zysset, S. (2005). Action-induced blindness with lateralized stimuli and responses. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 214–222.CrossRef Müsseler, J., Wühr, P., Danielmeier, C., & Zysset, S. (2005). Action-induced blindness with lateralized stimuli and responses. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 214–222.CrossRef
go back to reference Pelli, D. G. (1997). The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.PubMedCrossRef Pelli, D. G. (1997). The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pomerantz, J. R., & Portillo, M. C. (2011). Grouping and emergent features in vision: Toward a theory of basic gestalts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1331–1349.PubMedCrossRef Pomerantz, J. R., & Portillo, M. C. (2011). Grouping and emergent features in vision: Toward a theory of basic gestalts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1331–1349.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.PubMedCrossRef Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of language Processes, 32, 531–556. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of language Processes, 32, 531–556.
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between Perception and Action (pp. 167–201). New York, NY: Springer. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between Perception and Action (pp. 167–201). New York, NY: Springer.
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442.PubMedCrossRef Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Remington, R. W., & Folk, C. L. (2001). A dissociation between attention and selection. Psychological Science, 12, 511–515.PubMedCrossRef Remington, R. W., & Folk, C. L. (2001). A dissociation between attention and selection. Psychological Science, 12, 511–515.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schubö, A., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments. Psychological Research, 65, 145–157.PubMedCrossRef Schubö, A., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments. Psychological Research, 65, 145–157.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schubö, A., Prinz, W., & Aschersleben, G. (2004). Perceiving while acting: Action affects perception. Psychological Research, 68, 208–215.PubMedCrossRef Schubö, A., Prinz, W., & Aschersleben, G. (2004). Perceiving while acting: Action affects perception. Psychological Research, 68, 208–215.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 349–355.PubMedCrossRef Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 349–355.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974.PubMedCrossRef Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68, 176–188.PubMedCrossRef Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68, 176–188.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef
go back to reference Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99.PubMedCrossRef Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Thomaschke, R., Hopkins, B., & Miall, R. C. (2012a). The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: Reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects. Psychological Review, 119, 388–407.PubMedCrossRef Thomaschke, R., Hopkins, B., & Miall, R. C. (2012a). The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: Reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects. Psychological Review, 119, 388–407.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Thomaschke, R., Hopkins, B., & Miall, R. C. (2012b). The role of cue-response mapping in motorvisual impairment and facilitation: Evidence for different roles of action planning and action control in motorvisual dual-task priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 336–349.PubMedCrossRef Thomaschke, R., Hopkins, B., & Miall, R. C. (2012b). The role of cue-response mapping in motorvisual impairment and facilitation: Evidence for different roles of action planning and action control in motorvisual dual-task priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 336–349.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459–478.PubMedCrossRef Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459–478.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141.PubMedCrossRef Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Von Mühlenen, A., Rempel, M. I., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Unique temporal change is the key to attentional capture. Psychological Science, 16, 979–986.PubMedCrossRef Von Mühlenen, A., Rempel, M. I., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Unique temporal change is the key to attentional capture. Psychological Science, 16, 979–986.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1260–1270.PubMedCrossRef Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1260–1270.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2009). How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755–1769.PubMedCrossRef Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2009). How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755–1769.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance (Vol 18, pp. 73–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance (Vol 18, pp. 73–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 661–676.PubMedCrossRef Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 661–676.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 962–978.CrossRef Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 962–978.CrossRef
go back to reference Zwickel, J., Grosjean, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Seeing while moving: measuring the online influence of action on perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1063–1071.CrossRef Zwickel, J., Grosjean, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Seeing while moving: measuring the online influence of action on perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1063–1071.CrossRef
go back to reference Zwickel, J., Grosjean, M., & Prinz, W. (2010). On interference effects in concurrent perception and action. Psychological Research, 74, 152–171. Zwickel, J., Grosjean, M., & Prinz, W. (2010). On interference effects in concurrent perception and action. Psychological Research, 74, 152–171.
go back to reference Zwickel, J., & Prinz, W. (2012). Assimilation and contrast: The two sides of specific interference between action and perception. Psychological Research, 76, 171–182.PubMedCrossRef Zwickel, J., & Prinz, W. (2012). Assimilation and contrast: The two sides of specific interference between action and perception. Psychological Research, 76, 171–182.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing
Auteurs
Davood G. Gozli
Stephanie C. Goodhew
Joshua B. Moskowitz
Jay Pratt
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0461-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2013

Psychological Research 5/2013 Naar de uitgave