Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

27-02-2018 | Original Article | Uitgave 2/2018 Open Access

Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2018

i-Assess: Evaluating the impact of electronic data capture for OSCE

Tijdschrift:
Perspectives on Medical Education > Uitgave 2/2018
Auteurs:
Sandra Monteiro, Debra Sibbald, Karen Coetzee
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Prior presentation

Oral presentation at the Canadian Conference on Medical Education 2016.

Abstract

Introduction

Tablet-based assessments offer benefits over scannable-paper assessments; however, there is little known about the impact to the variability of assessment scores.

Methods

Two studies were conducted to evaluate changes in rating technology. Rating modality (paper vs tablets) was manipulated between candidates (Study 1) and within candidates (Study 2). Average scores were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, Cronbach’s alpha and generalizability theory. Post-hoc analyses included a Rasch analysis and McDonald’s omega.

Results

Study 1 revealed a main effect of modality (F (1,152) = 25.06, p < 0.01). Average tablet-based scores were higher, (3.39/5, 95% CI = 3.28 to 3.51), compared with average scan-sheet scores (3.00/5, 95% CI = 2.90 to 3.11). Study 2 also revealed a main effect of modality (F (1, 88) = 15.64, p < 0.01), however, the difference was reduced to 2% with higher scan-sheet scores (3.36, 95% CI = 3.30 to 3.42) compared with tablet scores (3.27, 95% CI = 3.21 to 3.33). Internal consistency (alpha and omega) remained high (>0.8) and inter-station reliability remained constant (0.3). Rasch analyses showed no relationship between station difficulty and rating modality.

Discussion

Analyses of average scores may be misleading without an understanding of internal consistency and overall reliability of scores. Although updating to tablet-based forms did not result in systematic variations in scores, routine analyses ensured accurate interpretation of the variability of assessment scores.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the importance of ongoing program evaluation and data analysis.
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2018

Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2018 Naar de uitgave