Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-02-2025 | Research

Hypervigilance strikes a balance between external and internal attention: behavioral and modeling evidence from the switching attention task

Auteurs: Nan Wang, Sam Verschooren, Luc Vermeylen, Ivan Grahek, Gilles Pourtois

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2025

Abstract

Hypervigilance involves increased attentional scanning of the environment to facilitate the detection of possible threats. Accordingly, this state is mostly bound to external attention and as a corollary, it might be detrimental to internal attention and further affect attentional balance defined as the ability to switch dynamically between these two domains. In the current study, we aimed to address this question and induced hypervigilance in 49 healthy participants through the presentation of a task-unrelated aversive sound while they performed the switching attention task (SAT), which was previously devised to study attentional balance. The skin conductance response results, as well as subjective sound ratings, confirmed that the hypervigilance manipulation was successful. At the behavioral level, hypervigilance led to a more symmetrical balance between internal and external attention compared to the control and neutral conditions, where it was asymmetrical, replicating previous studies. Moreover, using a drift diffusion model, we found that hypervigilance reduced the drift rate for internal repetition trials, suggesting that hypervigilance possibly caused an impaired shielding of internal attention.

vorige artikel The effect of inverting decades and units on the retention of two-digit numbers in working memory: a matter of the output mode

volgende artikel Investigating the effect of cognitive load on the intentionality bias

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Participants were excluded primarily based on accuracy, with those scoring below 60% in any of the twelve conditions being removed. This exclusion process was carried out after each test batch, which involved 5–8 participants at a time.

7 out of 49 participants were left-handed, however, they all reported they felt comfortable to use their right hand to perform the task. Therefore, the SCR was recorded from the left hand for all participants.

This model was the second best model during model comparison, which had a comparable BF_M compared to the best model (BF_M=12.397). We chose the second best model because we were mostly interested in the three-way interaction between Switch Type, Attention Type, and Emotion.

We also examined boundary separation (a) with an extra model estimation (see Table S4 in Supplementary Materials).

S – switch, R – repeat; E – external, I – internal.

Benedek, M., & Kaernbach, C. (2010). A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 190(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bieling, P. J., Antony, M. M., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). The state-trait anxiety inventory, trait version : Structure and content re-examined. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00023-0CrossRefPubMed

Bijsterbosch, J., Smith, S., & Bishop, S. J. (2019). Functional connectivity under anticipation of shock: Correlates of trait anxious affect versus Induced anxiety. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(9), 1840–1853. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocnCrossRef

Boehm, U., Annis, J., Frank, M. J., Hawkins, G. E., Heathcote, A., Kellen, D., Krypotos, A. M., Lerche, V., Logan, G. D., Palmeri, T. J., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Servant, M., Singmann, H., Starns, J. J., Voss, A., Wiecki, T. V., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2018). Estimating across-trial variability parameters of the diffusion decision model: Expert advice and recommendations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 87, 46–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.09.004CrossRef

Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal activity. Springer Science & Business Media.

Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in Picture Processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276CrossRefPubMed

Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. (2012). MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and bayesian analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0CrossRefPubMed

Chajut, E., & Algom, D. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of Social Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.231CrossRefPubMed

Chapman, C. R. (1978). Pain: The perception of noxious events. In R. A. Sternbach (Ed.), The psychology of pain (pp. 169–202). Raven Press.

Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427CrossRefPubMed

Cornwell, B. R., Garrido, M. I., Overstreet, C., Pine, D. S., & Grillon, C. (2017). The unpredictive brain under threat: A neurocomputational account of anxious hypervigilance. Biological Psychiatry, 82(6), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.031CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., & Eccleston, C. (2005). Hypervigilance to pain: An experimental and clinical analysis. Pain, 116(1–2), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.035CrossRefPubMed

Davis, M., Walker, D. L., Miles, L., & Grillon, C. (2010). Phasic vs sustained fear in rats and humans: Role of the extended amygdala in fear vs anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology : Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.109CrossRefPubMed

Derakshan, N., Smyth, S., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Effects of state anxiety on performance using a task-switching paradigm: An investigation of attentional control theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(6), 1112–1117. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.6.1112CrossRef

Dolan, R., & Vuilleumier, P. (2003). Amygdala automaticity in emotional processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 985, 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.01.005%0A. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0309174016301395CrossRefPubMed

Dreisbach, G., & Wenke, D. (2011). The shielding function of Task Sets and its relaxation during Task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 37(6), 1540–1546. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024077CrossRefPubMed

Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Miller Singley, A. T., & Bunge, S. A. (2017). Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001CrossRefPubMed

Endo, N., Saiki, J., Nakao, Y., & Saito, H. (2003). Perceptual judgments of novel contour shapes and hierarchical descriptions of geometrical properties. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 74(4), 346–353. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.74.346CrossRefPubMed

Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336CrossRefPubMed

Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Fossella, J., Flombaum, J. I., & Posner, M. I. (2005). The activation of attentional networks. Neuroimage, 26(2), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.004CrossRefPubMed

Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/2246134CrossRef

Giannakakis, G., Pediaditis, M., Manousos, D., Kazantzaki, E., Chiarugi, F., Simos, P. G., Marias, K., & Tsiknakis, M. (2017). Stress and anxiety detection using facial cues from videos. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 31, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2016.06.020CrossRef

Gresch, D., Boettcher, S. E., van Ede, F., & Nobre, A. C. (2024). Shifting attention between perception and working memory. Cognition, 245, 105731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105731CrossRefPubMed

Grillon, C. (2008). Models and mechanisms of anxiety: Evidence from startle studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 199(3), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-1019-1CrossRefPubMed

Grillon, C., & Ameli, R. (1998). Effects of threat and safety signals on startle during anticipation of aversive shocks, sounds, or airblasts. Journal of Psychophysiology, 12(4), 329–337.

Grillon, C., Baas, J. P., Lissek, S., Smith, K., & Milstein, J. (2004). Anxious responses to predictable and unpredictable aversive events. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118(5), 916–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.118.5.916CrossRefPubMed

Grillon, C., Baas, J. M. P., Cornwell, B., & Johnson, L. (2006). Context conditioning and behavioral avoidance in a virtual reality environment: Effect of predictability. Biological Psychiatry, 60(7), 752–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.072CrossRefPubMed

Grupe, D., & Nitschke, J. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gustavson, D. E., Altamirano, L. J., Johnson, D. P., & Whisman, M. A. (2017). Is set shifting really impaired in trait anxiety? Only when switching away from an Effortfully established Task Set. Emotion, 17(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000212CrossRefPubMed

Harrigan, J. A., & O’Connell, D. M. (1996). How do you look when feeling anxious? Facial displays of anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00050-5CrossRef

Hartanto, A., & Yang, H. (2022). Testing theoretical assumptions underlying the relation between anxiety, mind wandering, and task-switching: A diffusion model analysis. Emotion, 22(3), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000935CrossRefPubMed

Hu, C. P., Lan, Y., Macrae, C. N., & Sui, J. (2020). Good me bad me: Prioritization of the good-self during Perceptual decision-making. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.301CrossRef

Imburgio, M. J., & Orr, J. M. (2021). Component processes underlying voluntary task selection: Separable contributions of task-set inertia and reconfiguration. Cognition, 212(April 2020), 104685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104685

IMotions. (2017). Galvanic skin response the Complete Pocket Guide. Sci Teach. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229669.n1404CrossRef

JASP Team. JASP (Version 0.17.1) [Computer software] (2023). https://jasp-stats.org/

Jeffreys, H. (1998). The theory of probability. OuP Oxford.

Jongkees, B. J., & Colzato, L. S. (2016). Spontaneous eye blink rate as predictor of dopamine-related cognitive function—A review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.020CrossRefPubMed

Karayanidis, F., Mansfield, E. L., Galloway, K. L., Smith, J. L., Provost, A., & Heathcote, A. (2009). Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(2), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.2.202CrossRef

Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes Factors. Jounral of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795.CrossRef

Kiyonaga, A., & Egner, T. (2013). Working memory as internal attention: Toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0359-yCrossRefPubMed

Kleifges, K., Bigdely-Shamlo, N., Kerick, S. E., & Robbins, K. A. (2017). BLINKER: Automated extraction of ocular indices from EEG enabling large-scale analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11(FEB), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00012CrossRef

Kleshchova, O., Rieder, J. K., Grinband, J., & Weierich, M. R. (2019). Resting amygdala connectivity and basal sympathetic tone as markers of chronic hypervigilance. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 102(November 2018), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.11.036CrossRefPubMed

Kuhn, M., Gerlicher, A. M. V., & Lonsdorf, T. B. (2022). Navigating the manyverse of skin conductance response quantification approaches – a direct comparison of trough-to-peak, baseline correction, and model-based approaches in Ledalab and PsPM. Psychophysiology, 59(9), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14058CrossRef

Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 764–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013CrossRef

Liefooghe, B., Barrouillet, P., Vandierendonck, A., & Camos, V. (2008). Working memory costs of Task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(3), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.478CrossRefPubMed

Lim, Y. I., & Pratt, J. (2023). The interaction of internal and external attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 85, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02577-1CrossRef

Luharuka, R., Gao, R. X., & Krishnamurty, S. (2003). Design and realization of a portable data logger for physiological sensing. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 52(4), 1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2003.816808CrossRef

Max, C., Widmann, A., Kotz, S. A., Schröger, E., & Wetzel, N. (2015). Distraction by emotional sounds: Disentangling arousal benefits and orienting costs. Emotion, 15(4), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039041CrossRefPubMed

Minnick, M. R., Pérez-Edgar, K. E., & Soto, J. A. (2020). A disruption in the balance of attentional systems plays a role in trait anxiety. Brain Sciences, 10(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10100761CrossRef

Narhi-Martinez, W., Dube, B., & Golomb, J. D. (2023). Attention as a multi-level system of weights and balances. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1633CrossRef

Oberauer, K. (2019). Working Memory and attention – a conceptual analysis and review. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.58CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1243–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243CrossRefPubMed

Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Peters, M. L., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Van Drunen, C. (2000). Do fibromyalgia patients display hypervigilance for innocuous somatosensory stimuli? Application of a body scanning reaction time paradigm. Pain, 86(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00259-1CrossRefPubMed

Phelps, E., Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the Perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science, 17(4), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.xCrossRefPubMed

Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516CrossRefPubMed

R Core Team (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

RStudio team. (2023). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software. PBC. http://www.posit.co/

Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59CrossRef

Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446CrossRefPubMed

Ratcliff, R. (1985). Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. Psychological Review, 92(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.212CrossRefPubMed

Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). Drift diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling Response Times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9(5), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00067CrossRef

Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3), 438–481. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196302CrossRefPubMed

Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & Mckoon, G. (2006). A Diffusion Model Account of the Lexical decision Task. Psychological Review, 111(1), 159–182.CrossRef

Richards, H. J., Benson, V., Donnelly, N., & Hadwin, J. A. (2014). Exploring the function of selective attention and hypervigilance for threat in anxiety. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.006CrossRefPubMed

Rocher, A. R., & Pickering, A. D. (2022). STAI-Anxiety and STAI-Depression revisited. Journal of Individual Differences, 43(4), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000373CrossRef

Rollman, G. B. (2009). Perspectives on hypervigilance. Pain, 141(3), 183–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.12.030CrossRefPubMed

Rosen, J. B., & Schulkin, J. (2022). Hyperexcitability: From normal fear to pathological anxiety and trauma. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 16(August), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.727054CrossRef

Rossi, V., & Pourtois, G. (2012). State-dependent attention modulation of human primary visual cortex: A high density ERP study. Neuroimage, 60(4), 2365–2378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.007CrossRefPubMed

Rossi, V., & Pourtois, G. (2014). Electrical neuroimaging reveals content-specific effects of threat in primary visual cortex and fronto-parietal attentional networks. Neuroimage, 98, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.064CrossRefPubMed

Schmitz, F., & Krämer, R. J. (2023). Task switching: On the relation of cognitive flexibility with cognitive capacity. Journal of Intelligence, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11040068

Schmitz, F., & Voss, A. (2011). Decomposing Task-switching costs with the Diffusion Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 38(1), 222–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026003CrossRef

Schmitz, F., & Voss, A. (2014). Components of task switching: A closer look at task switching and cue switching. Acta Psychologica, 151, 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.009CrossRefPubMed

Schulkin, J., & Rosen, J. B. (1998). From normal fear to pathological anxiety. Psychological Review, 105(2), 325–350. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-01102-006CrossRefPubMed

Shackman, A. J., Sarinopoulos, I., Maxwell, J. S., Pizzagalli, D. A., Lavric, A., & Davidson, R. J. (2006). Anxiety selectively disrupts visuospatial working memory. Emotion, 6(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.40CrossRefPubMed

Shackman, A. J., Tromp, D. P. M., Stockbridge, M. D., Kaplan, C. M., & Fox, R. M. T. A. S. (2016). Dispositional negativity: An integrative psychological and neurobiological perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 142(12), 1275–1314.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Siegel, E. H., Sands, M. K., Noortgate, W., Van den, Chang, P. C. Y., Dy, J., Quigley, K. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2018). Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of autonomic features of emotion categories. Psychological Bulletin, 144(4), 343–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Mind Garden.

Ulrichsen, K. M., Alnæs, D., Kolskår, K. K., Richard, G., Sanders, A. M., Dørum, E. S., Ihle-Hansen, H., Pedersen, M. L., Tornås, S., Nordvik, J. E., & Westlye, L. T. (2020). Dissecting the cognitive phenotype of post-stroke fatigue using computerized assessment and computational modeling of sustained attention. European Journal of Neuroscience, 52(7), 3828–3845. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14861CrossRefPubMed

Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., & Koster, E. H. W. (2006). Hypervigilance to learned Pain signals: A componential analysis. Journal of Pain, 7(5), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2005.12.006CrossRefPubMed

Van der Ploeg, H. M., & Defares, P. B. (1980). ZBV. A dutch-language adaptation of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory. Lisse the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger NedTPsychologie, 35, 243–249.

Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 reference Manual. CreateSpace.

Verschooren, S., & Egner, T. (2023). When the mind’s eye prevails: The internal dominance over external attention (IDEA) hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(5), 1668–1688. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02272-8CrossRef

Verschooren, S., Liefooghe, B., Brass, M., & Pourtois, G. (2019). Attentional flexibility is imbalanced: Asymmetric cost for switches between external and internal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(10), 1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104668CrossRefPubMed

Verschooren, S., Pourtois, G., & Egner, T. (2020). More efficient shielding for Internal Than External attention? Evidence from Asymmetrical switch costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(9), 912–925. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000758CrossRefPubMed

Verschooren, S., Kessler, Y., & Egner, T. (2021). Evidence for a single mechanism gating perceptual and long-term memory information into working memory. Cognition, 212(March), 104668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104668CrossRefPubMed

Voss, A., Rothermund, K., & Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory and Cognition, 32(7), 1206–1220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196893.

Voss, A., Nagler, M., & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology: A practical introduction. Experimental Psychology, 60(6), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000218CrossRefPubMed

Vytal, K., Cornwell, B., Arkin, N., & Grillon, C. (2012). Describing the interplay between anxiety and cognition: From impaired performance under low cognitive load to reduced anxiety under high load. Psychophysiology, 49(6), 842–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01358.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7CrossRefPubMed

Weindel, G., Gajdos, T., Burle, B., & Alario, F. X. (2021). The decisive role of non-decision time for interpreting the parameters of decision making models (preprint). HAL Id: hal-03384458

Wiecki, T.,, V., Sofer,, I., Frank, & J, M. (2013). HDDM: Hierarchical bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in Python. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7(JULY 2013), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00014

Wieser, M. J., Reicherts, P., Juravle, G., & von Leupoldt, A. (2016). Attention mechanisms during predictable and unpredictable threat — a steady-state visual evoked potential approach. Neuroimage, 139, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.026CrossRefPubMed

Yoon, S. A., & Weierich, M. R. (2016). Salivary biomarkers of neural hypervigilance in trauma-exposed women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 63, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.09.007CrossRefPubMed

Ziegler, D. A., Janowich, J. R., & Gazzaley, A. (2018). Differential Impact of Interference on internally- and externally- Directed attention. Scientific Reports, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20498-8

Titel: Hypervigilance strikes a balance between external and internal attention: behavioral and modeling evidence from the switching attention task
Auteurs: Nan Wang
Sam Verschooren
Luc Vermeylen
Ivan Grahek
Gilles Pourtois
Publicatiedatum: 01-02-2025
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2025
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02028-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2025

Effects of global information on the estimation of point-light walker directions

Research

The role of selective attention in implicit learning: evidence for a contextual cueing effect of task-irrelevant features

Open Access
Research

Anchoring bias in mental arithmetic

Research

Hyper-binding: the surprising roles of age and affect

Research

Naturalistic multimodal emotion data with deep learning can advance the theoretical understanding of emotion

Open Access
Review

Investigating the effect of cognitive load on the intentionality bias

Open Access
Research