How to make PROMs work: qualitative insights from leaders at United States hospitals with successful PROMs programs | mijn-bsl Skip to main content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

16-03-2023

How to make PROMs work: qualitative insights from leaders at United States hospitals with successful PROMs programs

Auteurs: Colby J. Hyland, Danny Mou, Azan Z. Virji, Claire M. Sokas, Barbara Bokhour, Andrea L. Pusic, Christer Mjåset

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Elucidate facilitators, barriers, and key lessons learned regarding the implementation of system-wide clinical patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) programs among United States (US) healthcare leaders.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 35 US healthcare leaders, including chief-level executives, data directors, PROM directors, and department chairs involved in PROM implementation across seven diverse healthcare systems from February to June 2020. Transcripts were coded, evaluated for qualitative themes, and categorized according to the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).

Results

According to US hospital leaders with experience in existing clinical PROM programs, there are facilitators and barriers to implementation success in each CFIR domain. Allowing clinicians to select PROM measures and ensuring a user-friendly data platform (intervention); adapting data collection to patient home environments (outer setting); informing clinicians of the multi-faceted use of PROM data for research, clinical care, and business (inner setting); implementing PROM education earlier into clinician training (characteristics of individuals); and establishing specialty-agnostic PROM implementation teams (process) were among key facilitators to implementation success.

Conclusion

Leaders of geographically and clinically diverse PROM programs in the US identify common themes that facilitate successful implementation. Drivers of success depend on factors within and outside the clinical environment. These findings may serve to guide both establishing new PROM programs and refining existing PROM programs.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
3.
go back to reference Refolo, P., Minacori, R., Mele, V., Sacchini, D., & Spagnolo, A. G. (2012). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): The significance of using humanistic measures in clinical trial and clinical practice. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 16(10), 1319–1323. PubMed Refolo, P., Minacori, R., Mele, V., Sacchini, D., & Spagnolo, A. G. (2012). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): The significance of using humanistic measures in clinical trial and clinical practice. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 16(10), 1319–1323. PubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Kotronoulas, G., Kearney, N., Maguire, R., Harrow, A., Di Domenico, D., Croy, S., & MacGillivray, S. (2014). What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 32(14), 1480–1501. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2013.​53.​5948 CrossRefPubMed Kotronoulas, G., Kearney, N., Maguire, R., Harrow, A., Di Domenico, D., Croy, S., & MacGillivray, S. (2014). What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 32(14), 1480–1501. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2013.​53.​5948 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gibbons, C., Porter, I., Gonçalves-Bradley, D. C., Stoilov, S., Ricci-Cabello, I., Tsangaris, E., Gangannagaripalli, J., Davey, A., Gibbons, E. J., Kotzeva, A., Evans, J., van der Wees, P. J., Kontopantelis, E., Greenhalgh, J., Bower, P., Alonso, J., & Valderas, J. M. (2021). Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​14651858.​CD011589.​pub2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gibbons, C., Porter, I., Gonçalves-Bradley, D. C., Stoilov, S., Ricci-Cabello, I., Tsangaris, E., Gangannagaripalli, J., Davey, A., Gibbons, E. J., Kotzeva, A., Evans, J., van der Wees, P. J., Kontopantelis, E., Greenhalgh, J., Bower, P., Alonso, J., & Valderas, J. M. (2021). Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​14651858.​CD011589.​pub2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., Hess, R., Miller, D. M., Reeve, B. B., & Santana, M. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 21(8), 1305–1314. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-011-0054-x CrossRefPubMed Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., Hess, R., Miller, D. M., Reeve, B. B., & Santana, M. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 21(8), 1305–1314. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-011-0054-x CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Philpot, L. M., Barnes, S. A., Brown, R. M., Austin, J. A., James, C. S., Stanford, R. H., & Ebbert, J. O. (2018). Barriers and benefits to the use of patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical care: A qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Quality : The Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality, 33(4), 359–364. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1062860617745986​ CrossRefPubMed Philpot, L. M., Barnes, S. A., Brown, R. M., Austin, J. A., James, C. S., Stanford, R. H., & Ebbert, J. O. (2018). Barriers and benefits to the use of patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical care: A qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Quality : The Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality, 33(4), 359–364. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1062860617745986​ CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mou, D., Horn, D. M., Heng, M., Castillo-Angeles, M., Ladin, K., Frendl, D., Kaur, M., del Carmen, M., Sequist, T. D., & Sisodia, R. C. (2022). Primary care physician’s (PCP) perceived value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: A mixed methods study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 31(3), 221–229. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjqs-2020-012206 CrossRef Mou, D., Horn, D. M., Heng, M., Castillo-Angeles, M., Ladin, K., Frendl, D., Kaur, M., del Carmen, M., Sequist, T. D., & Sisodia, R. C. (2022). Primary care physician’s (PCP) perceived value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: A mixed methods study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 31(3), 221–229. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjqs-2020-012206 CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., Hudis, C. A., Sabbatini, P., Rogak, L., Bennett, A. V., Dueck, A. C., Atkinson, T. M., Chou, J. F., Dulko, D., Sit, L., Barz, A., Novotny, P., Fruscione, M., Sloan, J. A., & Schrag, D. (2016). Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 34(6), 557–565. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2015.​63.​0830 CrossRefPubMed Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., Hudis, C. A., Sabbatini, P., Rogak, L., Bennett, A. V., Dueck, A. C., Atkinson, T. M., Chou, J. F., Dulko, D., Sit, L., Barz, A., Novotny, P., Fruscione, M., Sloan, J. A., & Schrag, D. (2016). Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 34(6), 557–565. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2015.​63.​0830 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Braeken, A. P. B. M., Kempen, G. I. J. M., Eekers, D. B. P., Houben, R. M. A., van Gils, F. C. J. M., Ambergen, T., & Lechner, L. (2013). Psychosocial screening effects on health-related outcomes in patients receiving radiotherapy. A cluster randomised controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology, 22(12), 2736–2746. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​3340 CrossRefPubMed Braeken, A. P. B. M., Kempen, G. I. J. M., Eekers, D. B. P., Houben, R. M. A., van Gils, F. C. J. M., Ambergen, T., & Lechner, L. (2013). Psychosocial screening effects on health-related outcomes in patients receiving radiotherapy. A cluster randomised controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology, 22(12), 2736–2746. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​3340 CrossRefPubMed
22.
24.
go back to reference Gelkopf, M., Mazor, Y., & Roe, D. (2021). A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) and provider assessment in mental health: Goals, implementation, setting, measurement characteristics and barriers. International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 34(1), ii13–ii27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​intqhc/​mzz133 CrossRefPubMed Gelkopf, M., Mazor, Y., & Roe, D. (2021). A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) and provider assessment in mental health: Goals, implementation, setting, measurement characteristics and barriers. International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 34(1), ii13–ii27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​intqhc/​mzz133 CrossRefPubMed
25.
27.
go back to reference Stover, A. M., Haverman, L., van Oers, H. A., Greenhalgh, J., & Potter, C. M. (2021). Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 30(11), 3015–3033. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-020-02564-9 CrossRefPubMed Stover, A. M., Haverman, L., van Oers, H. A., Greenhalgh, J., & Potter, C. M. (2021). Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 30(11), 3015–3033. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-020-02564-9 CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Howell, D., Molloy, S., Wilkinson, K., Green, E., Orchard, K., Wang, K., & Liberty, J. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: A scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Annals of Oncology : Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 26(9), 1846–1858. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdv181 CrossRefPubMed Howell, D., Molloy, S., Wilkinson, K., Green, E., Orchard, K., Wang, K., & Liberty, J. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: A scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Annals of Oncology : Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 26(9), 1846–1858. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdv181 CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference van Muilekom, M. M., Teela, L., van Oers, H. A., van Goudoever, J. B., Grootenhuis, M. A., & Haverman, L. (2022). Patients’ and parents’ perspective on the implementation of patient reported outcome measures in pediatric clinical practice using the KLIK PROM portal. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 31(1), 241–254. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-021-02950-x CrossRefPubMed van Muilekom, M. M., Teela, L., van Oers, H. A., van Goudoever, J. B., Grootenhuis, M. A., & Haverman, L. (2022). Patients’ and parents’ perspective on the implementation of patient reported outcome measures in pediatric clinical practice using the KLIK PROM portal. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 31(1), 241–254. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-021-02950-x CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Nelson, J. A., Chu, J. J., Dabic, S., Kenworthy, E. O., Shamsunder, M. G., McCarthy, C. M., Mehrara, B. J., & Pusic, A. L. (2022). Moving towards patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice: Implementation lessons from the BREAST-Q. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-022-03213-z CrossRefPubMed Nelson, J. A., Chu, J. J., Dabic, S., Kenworthy, E. O., Shamsunder, M. G., McCarthy, C. M., Mehrara, B. J., & Pusic, A. L. (2022). Moving towards patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice: Implementation lessons from the BREAST-Q. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-022-03213-z CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., Haverman, L., Absolom, K., Takeuchi, E., Feeny, D., Grootenhuis, M., & Velikova, G. (2015). Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 24(7), 1707–1718. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-014-0903-5 CrossRefPubMed Santana, M. J., Haverman, L., Absolom, K., Takeuchi, E., Feeny, D., Grootenhuis, M., & Velikova, G. (2015). Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 24(7), 1707–1718. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-014-0903-5 CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Taliercio, V. L., Snyder, A. M., Biggs, A. M., Kean, J., Hess, R., Duffin, K. C., Cizik, A. M., & Secrest, A. M. (2022). Clinicians’ perspectives on the integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes into dermatology clinics: A qualitative study. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 31(6), 1719–1725. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-021-03030-w CrossRefPubMed Taliercio, V. L., Snyder, A. M., Biggs, A. M., Kean, J., Hess, R., Duffin, K. C., Cizik, A. M., & Secrest, A. M. (2022). Clinicians’ perspectives on the integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes into dermatology clinics: A qualitative study. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 31(6), 1719–1725. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-021-03030-w CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
How to make PROMs work: qualitative insights from leaders at United States hospitals with successful PROMs programs
Auteurs
Colby J. Hyland
Danny Mou
Azan Z. Virji
Claire M. Sokas
Barbara Bokhour
Andrea L. Pusic
Christer Mjåset
Publicatiedatum
16-03-2023
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03388-z