Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2020

17-03-2020

How do doctors perceive and use patient quality of life? Findings from focus group interviews with hospital doctors and general practitioners

Auteurs: Pierre Caillault, Marianne Bourdon, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Leïla Moret

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

While studies on patients’ quality of life (QoL) are numerous, to date few have addressed the issue of what QoL means for doctors and how they use patient-reported QoL. This study aimed to explore how doctors define the concept of “patient QoL” and how they use QoL assessments in clinical practice.

Methods

Focus group (FG) interviews were conducted with French hospital doctors and general practitioners. Transcripts of the FGs were explored using inductive thematic and lexical analyses.

Results

Twenty-one clinicians participated in four FGs. They all agreed that QoL was a subjective and unstable concept, different from that of health status. In practice, the assessment of patient QoL was conducted using an intuitive and non-structured approach. Most participants thought that it would give them more confidence in making decisions and provide better patient care. But it was also seen in some cases as putting them in an uncomfortable position. The assessment of QoL requires a favourable work and organizational setting.

Conclusions

Patient QoL provides useful data for clinicians. Yet assessments are made without standardized tools. The use of such tools could be very valuable for some practitioners or in some situations, and a real source of problems for others. These problems could, however, be easily overcome with experience-sharing and training clinicians.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Gotay, C. C., & Moore, T. D. (1992). Assessing quality of life in head and neck cancer. Quality of Life Research,1(1), 5–17.CrossRef Gotay, C. C., & Moore, T. D. (1992). Assessing quality of life in head and neck cancer. Quality of Life Research,1(1), 5–17.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference van Knippenberg, F. C., & de Haes, J. C. (1998). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: Psychometric properties of instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,41(11), 1043–1053.CrossRef van Knippenberg, F. C., & de Haes, J. C. (1998). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: Psychometric properties of instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,41(11), 1043–1053.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Moons, P., Budts, W., & De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies,43(7), 891–901.CrossRef Moons, P., Budts, W., & De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies,43(7), 891–901.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference WHOQOL Group. (1993). Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research,2(2), 153–159.CrossRef WHOQOL Group. (1993). Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research,2(2), 153–159.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baars, R. M., van der Pal, S. M., Koopman, H. M., & Wit, J. M. (2004). Clinicians’ perspective on quality of life assessment in paediatric clinical practice. Acta Paediatrica,93(10), 1356–1362.CrossRef Baars, R. M., van der Pal, S. M., Koopman, H. M., & Wit, J. M. (2004). Clinicians’ perspective on quality of life assessment in paediatric clinical practice. Acta Paediatrica,93(10), 1356–1362.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2013). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Hoboken: Wiley. Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2013). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Hoboken: Wiley.
22.
go back to reference Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2016). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.CrossRef Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2016). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bardin, L. (1977). L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Bardin, L. (1977). L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
24.
go back to reference Reinert, M. (1987). Classification Descendante Hierarchique et Analvse Lexicale par Contexte - Application au Corpus des Poesies D’A. Rihbaud: Bulletin of Sociological Methodology.CrossRef Reinert, M. (1987). Classification Descendante Hierarchique et Analvse Lexicale par Contexte - Application au Corpus des Poesies D’A. Rihbaud: Bulletin of Sociological Methodology.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Reinert, A. (1983). Une méthode de classification descendante hiérarchique : application à l'analyse lexicale par contexte. Cahiers de l’analyse des données,8(2), 187–198. Reinert, A. (1983). Une méthode de classification descendante hiérarchique : application à l'analyse lexicale par contexte. Cahiers de l’analyse des données,8(2), 187–198.
26.
go back to reference Reinert, M. (2007). Postures énonciatives et mondes lexicaux stabilisés en analyse statistique de discours. Langage et société, no,121–122(3), 189–202.CrossRef Reinert, M. (2007). Postures énonciatives et mondes lexicaux stabilisés en analyse statistique de discours. Langage et société, no,121–122(3), 189–202.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. British Medical Journal,322(7297), 1297–1300.CrossRef Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. British Medical Journal,322(7297), 1297–1300.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Slevin, M. L., Plant, H., Lynch, D., Drinkwater, J., & Gregory, W. M. (1988). Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? British Journal of Cancer,57(1), 109–112.CrossRef Slevin, M. L., Plant, H., Lynch, D., Drinkwater, J., & Gregory, W. M. (1988). Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? British Journal of Cancer,57(1), 109–112.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
How do doctors perceive and use patient quality of life? Findings from focus group interviews with hospital doctors and general practitioners
Auteurs
Pierre Caillault
Marianne Bourdon
Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Leïla Moret
Publicatiedatum
17-03-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02451-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2020

Quality of Life Research 7/2020 Naar de uitgave