Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Previous studies found mental representations of route descriptions north-up oriented when egocentric experience (given by the protagonist’s initial view) was congruent with the global reference system. This study examines: (a) the development and maintenance of representations derived from descriptions when the egocentric and global reference systems are congruent or incongruent; and (b) how spatial abilities modulate these representations. Sixty participants (in two groups of 30) heard route descriptions of a protagonist’s moves starting from the bottom of a layout and headed mainly northwards (SN description) in one group, and headed south from the top (NS description, the egocentric view facing in the opposite direction to the canonical north) in the other. Description recall was tested with map drawing (after hearing the description a first and second time; i.e. Time 1 and 2) and South-North (SN) or North–South (NS) pointing tasks; and spatial objective tasks were administered. The results showed that: (a) the drawings were more rotated in NS than in SN descriptions, and performed better at Time 2 than at Time 1 for both types of description; SN pointing was more accurate than NS pointing for the SN description, while SN and NS pointing accuracy did not differ for the NS description; (b) spatial (rotation) abilities were related to recall accuracy for both types of description, but were more so for the NS ones. Overall, our results showed that the way in which spatial information is conveyed (with/without congruence between the egocentric and global reference systems) and spatial abilities influence the development and maintenance of mental representations.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bosco, A., Filomena, S., Sardone, L., Scalisi, T. G., & Longoni, A. M. (1996). Spatial models derived from verbal descriptions of fictitious environments: the influence of study time and the individual differences in visuospatial ability. Psychologische Beitrage, 38, 451–464.
Corsi, P.M. (1972). Human Memory and the Medial Temporal Region of the Brain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
De Beni, R., Meneghetti, C., Fiore, F., Gava, L., Borella, E. (2014). Batteria VS. Abilità visuo-spaziali nell’arco di vita adulta [VS Battery. Visuo-spatial abilities in adults life span]. Hogrefe: Firenze.
Gardony, A. L., Taylor, H. A. & Brunyé, T. T. (2015). Gardony Map Drawing Analyzer: Software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behavior Research Methods, 1-27. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0556-x.
Gyselinck, V. & Meneghetti, C. (2011). The role of spatial working memory in understanding verbal descriptions: A window into the interaction between verbal and spatial processing. In A. Vandienrendonck and A. Szmalec (Eds.). Spatial Working Memory. Psychology Press. ISBN: 978-1-84872-033-6; pp. 159-180.
Hatzipanayioti, A., Galati, A. & Avraamides, M.N. (in press). The Protagonist’s First Perspective Influences the Encoding of Spatial Information in Narratives. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1056194.
Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Harvard University Press.
Likert, R., & Quasha, W. (1941). The Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-Spatial Working Memory. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 181–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McNamara, T. P. (2003). How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition III: Routes and Navigation, Human Memory and Learning, Spatial Representation and Spatial Reasoning, LNAI 2685 (pp. 174–191). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. CrossRef
McNamara, T. P. (2013). Spatial memory: Properties and organization. In Waller, D. (Ed); Nadel, Lynn (Ed), Handbook of Spatial Cognition (pp. 173-190). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/13936-010.
McNamara, T. P., Sluzenski, J. & Rump, B. (2008). Human spatial memory and navigation. In H.L. Roedinger, III (Ed.), Cognitive Psychology of Memory. Vol.  of Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 4 vols. (J. Byrne Editor). Oxford: Elsevier.
Meneghetti, C., Borella, E., Muffato, V., Pazzaglia, F. & De Beni, R. (2014). Environment learning from spatial descriptions: The role of perspective and spatial abilities in young and older adults. In Spatial Cognition IX (pp. 30-45). Springer International Publishing.
Meneghetti, C., Ronconi, L., Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2014b). Spatial mental representations derived from spatial descriptions: the predicting and mediating roles of spatial preferences, strategies, and abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 295–315. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12038. CrossRefPubMed
Morrow, D. G., Stine-Morrow, E. A., Leirer, V. O., Andrassy, J. M., & Kahn, J. (1997). The role of reader age and focus of attention in creating situation models from narratives. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52, 73–80. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52B.2.P73. CrossRef
- How directions of route descriptions influence orientation specificity: the contribution of spatial abilities
Rossana De Beni
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg