Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 8/2016

01-08-2016

How different are composite and traditional TTO valuations of severe EQ-5D-5L states?

Auteurs: Feng Xie, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Kathy Gaebel, Nick Bansback, Stirling Bryan, Arto Ohinmaa, Lise Poissant, Jeffrey A. Johnson

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objective

Different variants of time trade-off (TTO) have been employed to elicit health state preferences and to create value sets for preference-based instruments. We compared composite TTO (cTTO) with traditional TTO (tTTO) in valuing severe EQ-5D-5L health states.

Methods

cTTO uses tTTO to elicit values for health states better than dead and the lead-time TTO for states worse than dead. Eighteen severe states were valued using both cTTO and tTTO. Participants meeting predefined inconsistency criteria were excluded from the analyses. Histograms were used to examine the distributions of cTTO and tTTO values. Mean difference between the cTTO and tTTO values was calculated. Bland–Altman plots were used to examine the agreement between the cTTO and tTTO values for each health state. We used a logistic mixed effects model with random intercepts to identify variables that were associated with the directional change between the two TTO values.

Results

A total of 1024 participants were included in the analysis with the mean age (SD) being 47.1 (17.4) years and 54.9 % female. For cTTO, 25 % of the values clustered at zero and there were few values between 0 and −0.5. In contrast, tTTO had fewer values at zero and more falling between −0.5 and 0. The distribution of positive values was similar between cTTO and tTTO. For worse than dead health states, the cTTO values tended to be higher than the tTTO values. In the logistic mixed effects model, those who did not agree that it was easy to understand the cTTO questions more likely changed from positive values in cTTO to zero or negative values in tTTO or change from zero cTTO values to negative values in tTTO compared with those who agreed (odds ratio 1.314, p = 0.037).

Conclusion

cTTO is an appealing technique in eliciting health state preferences, but further evidence is needed for its performance in valuing EQ-5D health states on a wide spectrum of health state severity.

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Al Sayah F., Mladenovic, A., Gaebel, K., Xie, F., & Johnson, J. A. (2015). How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations. Quality of Life Research, 25(1), 35–43. CrossRefPubMed Al Sayah F., Mladenovic, A., Gaebel, K., Xie, F., & Johnson, J. A. (2015). How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations. Quality of Life Research, 25(1), 35–43. CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Attema, A. E., Versteegh, M. M., Oppe, M., Brouwer, W. B., & Stolk, E. A. (2013). Lead time TTO: Leading to better health state valuations? Health Economics, 22, 376–392. CrossRefPubMed Attema, A. E., Versteegh, M. M., Oppe, M., Brouwer, W. B., & Stolk, E. A. (2013). Lead time TTO: Leading to better health state valuations? Health Economics, 22, 376–392. CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 1, 307–310. CrossRef Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 1, 307–310. CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Devlin, N. J., Tsuchiya, A., Buckingham, K., & Tilling, C. (2011). A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: Feasibility study of the ‘lead time’ approach. Health Economics, 20, 348–361. CrossRefPubMed Devlin, N. J., Tsuchiya, A., Buckingham, K., & Tilling, C. (2011). A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: Feasibility study of the ‘lead time’ approach. Health Economics, 20, 348–361. CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., et al. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20, 1727–1736. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., et al. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20, 1727–1736. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Janssen, B. M., Oppe, M., Versteegh, M. M., & Stolk, E. A. (2013). Introducing the composite time trade-off: A test of feasibility and face validity. The European Journal of Health Economics, 14(Suppl 1), S5–S13. CrossRefPubMed Janssen, B. M., Oppe, M., Versteegh, M. M., & Stolk, E. A. (2013). Introducing the composite time trade-off: A test of feasibility and face validity. The European Journal of Health Economics, 14(Suppl 1), S5–S13. CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lamers, L. M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P. F., Krabbe, P. F., & Busschbach, J. J. (2006). The Dutch tariff: Results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics, 15, 1121–1132. CrossRefPubMed Lamers, L. M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P. F., Krabbe, P. F., & Busschbach, J. J. (2006). The Dutch tariff: Results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics, 15, 1121–1132. CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pullenayegum, E., & Xie, F. (2013). Scoring the 5-Level EQ-5D: Can latent utilities derived from a discrete choice model be transformed to health utilities derived from time tradeoff tasks? Medical Decision Making, 33, 567–578. CrossRefPubMed Pullenayegum, E., & Xie, F. (2013). Scoring the 5-Level EQ-5D: Can latent utilities derived from a discrete choice model be transformed to health utilities derived from time tradeoff tasks? Medical Decision Making, 33, 567–578. CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Robinson, A., & Spencer, A. (2006). Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: Valuing states worse than dead. Health Economics, 15, 393–402. CrossRefPubMed Robinson, A., & Spencer, A. (2006). Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: Valuing states worse than dead. Health Economics, 15, 393–402. CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43, 203–220. CrossRefPubMed Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43, 203–220. CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Torrance, G. W. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5, 1–30. CrossRefPubMed Torrance, G. W. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5, 1–30. CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Xie, F., Gaebel, K., Perampaladas, K., Doble, B., & Pullenayegum, E. (2014). Comparing EQ-5D valuation studies: A systematic review and methodological reporting checklist. Medical Decision Making, 34, 8–20. CrossRefPubMed Xie, F., Gaebel, K., Perampaladas, K., Doble, B., & Pullenayegum, E. (2014). Comparing EQ-5D valuation studies: A systematic review and methodological reporting checklist. Medical Decision Making, 34, 8–20. CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
How different are composite and traditional TTO valuations of severe EQ-5D-5L states?
Auteurs
Feng Xie
Eleanor Pullenayegum
Kathy Gaebel
Nick Bansback
Stirling Bryan
Arto Ohinmaa
Lise Poissant
Jeffrey A. Johnson
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1242-5