Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) uses traditional time trade-off (tTTO) for health states better than dead and lead-time TTO (LT-TTO) for states worse than dead to elicit a value (−1.0 to +1.0) for each health state. In the Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation study which used the EQVT platform, we observed an unexpected peak in frequency of “0” values and few negative values, particularly in the range of 0 to −0.5. To better understand this finding, we sought to explore respondents’ thought processes while valuing a health state, and their understanding of the tTTO and LT-TTO exercises.
Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with EQVT task respondents. Questions focused on valuations of health states as: (a) Same as dead in tTTO, (b) Worse than dead in tTTO but changed to same as dead in LT-TTO, (c) Worse than dead in LT-TTO, and (d) Worse than dead in LT-TTO with trading off all 10 years. Data were analyzed using content and thematic analysis.
Mean age of participants (N = 70) was 40 ± 18.1 years, 60 % female, and 76 % Caucasian. Participants provided similar reasons for valuing a health state same as or worse than dead. Many participants expressed confusion about worse than dead valuations, distinction between same as and worse than dead, and the transition from tTTO to LT-TTO. A few indicated that the addition of 10 years of full health in the LT-TTO influenced their valuations.
The transition from tTTO to LT-TTO in the EQVT was confusing to participants, whereby some health state valuations around this transition appeared to be arbitrary.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Xie, F., Pullenayegum, E., Gaebel, K., Bansback, N., Bryan, B., Ohinmaa, A., et al. A time trade-off-derived value set of EQ-5D-5L for Canada. Medical Care (in press).
San Miguel, F., Ryan, M., & Amaya-Amaya, M. (2005). ‘Irrational’ stated preferences: A quantitative and qualitative investigation. Health Economics, 14, 307–322. CrossRef
Mulhern, B., Tsuchiya, A., Brazier, J., & Rowen, D. (2012). How do respondents perceive health state valuation exercises? A ‘think aloud’ study investigating time trade off and discrete choice experiments. Paper for presentation at EuroQol Plenary 2012.
Jansen, S. J., Stiggelbout, A. M., Wakker, P, P., Nooij, M. A., Noordijk, E. M., & Kievit, J. (2000). Unstable preferences: A shift in valuation or an effect of the elicitation procedure. Medical Decision Making, 20(1), 62–71.
Edelaar-Peeters, Stiggelbout, A. M., & Van Den Hout, W. B. (2014). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of interviewer help answering the time tradeoff. Medical Decision Making, 34(5), 655–665.
Xie, F., Pullenayegum, E., Li, H., Al Sayah, F., Gaebel, K., Ohinmaa, A., et al. Too easy to be reliable? Test-retest reliability of the TTO and DCE tasks in the EuroQol Group Valuation Technology (under review).
Janssen, B. M., Oppe, M., Versteegh, M. M., & Stolk, E. A. (2013). Introducing the composite time trade-off: A test of feasibility and face validity. The European Journal of Health Economics, 14(Suppl 1), S5–S13.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2005). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 81–92.
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 10 ed2012.
- How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations
Fatima Al Sayah
Jeffrey A. Johnson
- Springer International Publishing