Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-09-2007 | Original Paper | Uitgave 7/2007

Quality of Life Research 7/2007

How can quality of life researchers make their work more useful to health workers and their patients?

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 7/2007
Auteurs:
Gordon Guyatt, Holger Schunemann

Abstract

To make optimal use of data from randomized trials in clinical decision-making, clinicians require knowledge of the magnitude of treatment effects. Reports of trials including quality of life data often fail to report results that provide interpretable estimates of magnitude of effect. Strategies that investigators could use to remedy this problem include reporting mean differences between groups in relation to the minimal important difference and reporting the proportion of patients who benefit from treatment and the associated number needed to treat. Techniques are available that allow investigators to use the same strategies in reporting pooled estimates from meta-analyses, even when studies use different instruments to measure the same construct. These reporting approaches, as well as ensuring access to data from individual items, will also help those developing decision aids to use quality of life data.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2007

Quality of Life Research 7/2007 Naar de uitgave