Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-02-2007

Hostility, Anger, and Marital Adjustment: Concurrent and Prospective Associations with Psychosocial Vulnerability

Auteurs: Kelly Glazer Baron, Timothy W. Smith, Jonathan Butner, Jill Nealey-Moore, Melissa W. Hawkins, Bert N. Uchino

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 1/2007

Abstract

Hostility may contribute to risk for disease through psychosocial vulnerability, including the erosion of the quality of close relationships. This study examined hostility, anger, concurrent ratings of the relationship, and change in marital adjustment over 18 months in 122 married couples. Wives’ and husbands’ hostility and anger were related to concurrent ratings of marital adjustment and conflict. In prospective analyses, wives’ but not husbands’ hostility and anger were related to change in marital adjustment. In hierarchical regression and SEM models wives’ anger was a unique predictor of both wives’ and husbands’ change in marital adjustment. The association between wives’ anger and change in husbands’ marital satisfaction was mediated by husbands’ ratings of conflict in the marriage. These results support the role of hostility and anger in the development of psychosocial vulnerability, but also suggest an asymmetry in the effects of wives’ and husbands’ trait anger and hostility on marital adjustment.

volgende artikel Specificity of Social Support for Back Pain Patients: Do Patients Care Who Provides What?

Baucom, D. H., Shoham, V., Mueser, K. T., et al. (1998). Empirically supported couple and family interventions for marital distress and adult mental health problems. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 66(1): 53–88.PubMedCrossRef

Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., et al. (1989). The Cook-Medley Hostility scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosom. Med. 51(1): 46–57.PubMed

Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35(6): 1173–1182.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indicies in structural models. Psych. Bull. 107(2): 238–246.CrossRef

Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A., and Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 136–162

Bushman, B. J., Cooper, H. M., and Lemke, K. M. (1991). Meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration using the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(3): 344–349.

Buss, A. H., and Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. J. Consult. Psychol. 21: 343–349.PubMedCrossRef

Buss, A. H., and Perry, M. (1982). The aggression questionnaire. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63: 452–459.

Cook, W. W., and Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic virtue scales for the MMPI. J. App. Psychol. 38: 414–418.CrossRef

Crane, D. R., Allgood, S. M., and Larson, J. H. (1990). Assessing marital quality with distressed and nondistressed couples: A comparison and equivalency table for three frequently used measures. J. Marriage Fam. 52(1): 87–93.CrossRef

Freeston, M. H., and Pléchaty, M. (1997). Reconsiderations of the locke-wallace marital adjustment test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s? Psych. Rep. 81(2): 419–434.CrossRef

Gallo, L. C., and Smith, T. W. (1998). Construct validation of health-relevant personality traits: Interpersonal circumplex and five-factor model analyses of the Aggression Questionnaire. Intern. J. Beh. Med. 5: 129–147.CrossRef

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., et al. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. J. Marriage Fam. 60(1): 5–22.CrossRef

Harris, J. A. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the aggression questionnaire. Beh. Res. Ther. 33(8): 991–993.CrossRef

Hart, K. E. (1999). Cynical hostility and deficiencies in functional support: The moderating role of gender in psychosocial vulnerability to disease. Pers. Ind. Diff. 27: 69–83.CrossRef

Houston, B. K., and Kelly, K. E. (1989). Hostility in employed women: Relation to work and marital experiences, social support, stress, and anger expression. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 15(2): 175–182.

Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 76–99.

Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., and Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychol. Bull. 127: 472–503.PubMedCrossRef

Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Predictive validation of a telephone version of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test. J. Marriage Fam. 51(3): 767–775.CrossRef

Locke, H. J., and Wallace, E. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage Fam. Living 21: 251–255.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., and Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate. Behav. Res. 30(1): 41–62.CrossRef

Miller, T. Q., Marksides, K. S., Chiriboga, D. A., et al. (1995). A test of the psychosocial vulnerability and health behavior models of hostility: Results from an 11-year follow-up study of Mexican Americans. Psychosom. Med. 57: 572–581.PubMed

Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., et al. (1995). A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychol. Bull. 119: 322–348.CrossRef

Musante, L., MacDougall, J. M., Dembroski, T. M., et al. (1989). Potential hostility and dimensions of anger. Health Psychol. 8(3): 343–354.PubMedCrossRef

Muthén, L. K., and Muthén, B. O. (2001). Mplus user’s guide. (2nd edn.). Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.

Newton, T. L., and Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1995). Hostility and erosion of marital quality during early marriage. J. Behav. Med. 18: 601–619.PubMedCrossRef

O’Neil, J. N., and Emery, C. F. (2002). Psychosocial vulnerability, hostility, and family history of coronary heart disease among male and female college students. Int. J. Beh. Med. 9: 17–36.CrossRef

Pierce, G. R., Saronson, I. G., and Saronson, B. R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one? J. Per. Soc. Psychol. 61(6): 1028–1039.CrossRef

Pierce, G. R., Sarason, I. G., and Sarason, B. R. (1997). Assessing the quality of personal relationships. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 14(3): 339–356.

Ruiz, J. M., Smith, T. W., and Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Distinguishing narcissism and hostility: Similarities and differences in interpersonal circumplex and five-factor correlates. J. Pers. Ass. 76(3): 537–555.CrossRef

Roberts, L. J., and Krokoff, J. L. (1990). A time-series analysis of withdrawal, hostility, and displeasure in satisfied and dissatisfied marriages. J. Mar. Fam. 52(1): 95–105.CrossRef

Satorra, A., and Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. ASA Proceedings of the Business and Economic Section, pp. 308–313.

Schafer, J. L., and Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychol. Meth. 7(2): 147–177.CrossRef

Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and Health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychol. 11: 139–150.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, T. W. (1994). Concepts and methods in the study of anger, hostility, and health. In Siegman, A. W., and Smith, T. W. (Eds.), Anger, hostility and the heart. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 23–42.

Smith, T. W., and Gallo, L. C. (1999). Hostility and cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Psychosom. Med. 61: 436–445.PubMed

Smith, T. W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, J. M., and Gallo, L. C. (2004). Hostility, anger, aggressiveness and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. J. Pers. 72: 1217–1270.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, T. W., Nealey-Moore, J., Uchino, B., et al. (2003). Hostility, anger, and cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychosomatic Society, Phoenix, AZ March 5–8, 2003.

Smith, T. W., Pope, M. K., Sanders, J. D., et al. (1988). Cynical hostility at home and work: Psychosocial vulnerability across domains. J. Res. Pers. 22: 525–548.CrossRef

Smith, T. W., and Ruiz, J. M. (2002). Psychosocial influences on the development and course of coronary heart disease: Current status and implications for research and practice. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 70(3): 548–568.PubMedCrossRef

Uchino, B. N. (2004). Social support and physical health outcomes; Understanding the health consequences of our relationships. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Uchino, B. N., Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. W., and Bloor, L. (2004). Heterogeneity in social networks: A comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes. J. Soc. Clin. Psych. 23: 123–139.CrossRef

Titel: Hostility, Anger, and Marital Adjustment: Concurrent and Prospective Associations with Psychosocial Vulnerability
Auteurs: Kelly Glazer Baron
Timothy W. Smith
Jonathan Butner
Jill Nealey-Moore
Melissa W. Hawkins
Bert N. Uchino
Publicatiedatum: 01-02-2007
Uitgeverij: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9086-z

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2007

Perceived Ethnic Discrimination in Relation to Daily Moods and Negative Social Interactions

Acknowledgment of Reviewers, January 1, 2006—December 31, 2006

Specificity of Social Support for Back Pain Patients: Do Patients Care Who Provides What?

The Fear-Avoidance Model of Musculoskeletal Pain: Current State of Scientific Evidence

Associations among Salivary Cortisol, Melatonin, Catecholamines, Sleep Quality and Stress in Women with Breast Cancer and Healthy Controls

Effects of Opioid Blockade with Naltrexone and Distraction on Cold and Ischemic Pain in Hypertension