Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

volgende artikel The role of executive control in the activation...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

12-09-2016 | Original Article | Uitgave 6/2017 Open Access

HiTEC: a connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning

Tijdschrift:: Psychological Research > Uitgave 6/2017

Auteurs:: Pascal Haazebroek, Antonino Raffone, Bernhard Hommel

» Naar de volledige tekst

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that perception and action planning do not represent separable stages of a unidirectional processing sequence, but rather emerging properties of highly interactive processes. To capture these characteristics of the human cognitive system, we have developed a connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning: HiTEC, based on the Theory of Event Coding (Hommel et al. in Behav Brain Sci 24:849–937, 2001). The model is characterized by representations at multiple levels and by shared representations and processes. It complements available models of stimulus–response translation by providing a rationale for (1) how situation-specific meanings of motor actions emerge, (2) how and why some aspects of stimulus–response translation occur automatically and (3) how task demands modulate sensorimotor processing. The model is demonstrated to provide a unitary account and simulation of a number of key findings with multiple experimental paradigms on the interaction between perception and action such as the Simon effect, its inversion (Hommel in Psychol Res 55:270–279, 1993), and action–effect learning.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Amit, D. J., & Brunel, N. (1999). Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 237–252. CrossRef

Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377. PubMed

Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3–51). New York: Guilford Press.

Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. CrossRefPubMed

Botvinick, M. M., Buxbaum, L. J., Bylsma, L., & Jax, S. A. (2009). Toward an integrated account of object and action selection: A computational analysis and empirical findings from reaching-to-grasp and tool use. Neuropsychologia, 47, 671–683. CrossRefPubMed

Braitenberg, V., & Schüz, A. (1991). Anatomy of the cortex: Statistics and geometry. Heidelberg: Springer. CrossRef

Butz, M. V. & Pezzulo, G. (2008). Benefits of anticipations in cognitive agents. In G. Pezzulo., M. V. Butz., & C. Castelfranchi (Eds.), The challenge of anticipation, a unifying framework for the analysis and design of artificial cognitive systems, LNAI (Vol. 5225, pp. 45–62). Heidelberg: Springer

Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361. CrossRefPubMed

Cowey, A. (1985). Aspects of cortical organization related to selective attention and selective impairments of visual perception: A tutorial review. In M. I. Poster & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 41–62). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Deco, G., & Rolls, E. T. (2004). A neurodynamical cortical model of visual attention and invariant object recognition. Vision Research, 44, 621–642. CrossRefPubMed

Dehaene, S., Sergent, C., & Changeux, J.-P. (2003). A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 8520–8525. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

DeJong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.

DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11, 219–226. CrossRef

Donders, F. C. (1868). Over de snelheid van psychische processen. Onderzoekingen, gedaan in het physiologisch laboratorium der Utrechtsche hoogeschool, 2. reeks, 2, 92–120.

Duncan, J., Humphreys, G., & Ward, R. (1997). Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 255–261. CrossRefPubMed

Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 475–483. CrossRefPubMed

Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240. PubMed

Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research, 71, 22–29. CrossRefPubMed

Grossberg, S., & Grunewald, A. (1997). Cortical synchronization and perceptual framing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 117–132. CrossRefPubMed

Grossberg, S., & Somers, D. (1991). Synchronized oscillations during cooperative feature linking in a cortical model of visual perception. Neural Networks, 4, 453–466. CrossRef

Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331–342. CrossRefPubMed

Haazebroek, P., & Hommel, B. (2009). Anticipative control of voluntary action: Towards a computational model. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 5499, 31–47.

Haazebroek, P., van Dantzig, S., & Hommel, B. (2009). Towards a computational account of context mediated affective stimulus-response translation. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Haazebroek, P., van Dantzig, S., & Hommel, B. (2011). A computational model of perception and action for cognitive robotics. Cognitive Processing, 12, 355–365. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Haazebroek, P., van Dantzig, S., & Hommel, B. (2013). How task goals mediate the interplay between perception and action. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 247. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2012). Too good to be true? Ideomotor theory from a computational perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 494. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279. CrossRef

Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance (Vol. XVIII, pp. 247–273). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. CrossRefPubMed

Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. J. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 121–140). Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef

Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon task as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136, 189–202. CrossRefPubMed

Hommel, B., & Elsner, B. (2009). Acquisition, representation, and control of action. In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 371–398). New York: Oxford University Press.

Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937. CrossRefPubMed

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover Publications. CrossRef

Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387–403. CrossRef

Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. CrossRefPubMed

Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli 1: The time course of stimulus–stimulus and stimulus–response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688–714.

Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 87–106. CrossRefPubMed

Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C. (2010). Cognitive illusions of authorship reveal hierarchical error detection in skilled typists. Science, 330, 683–686. CrossRefPubMed

Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.

MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. CrossRefPubMed

Melcher, T., Weidema, M., Eenshuistra, R. M., Hommel, B., & Gruber, O. (2008). The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: an event-related fMRI analysis. Neuroimage, 39, 1274–1288. CrossRefPubMed

Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179–192. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259. CrossRefPubMed

Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. CrossRefPubMed

Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind: tutorial essays in cognition (pp. 93–148). Hove: Erlbaum.

Murre, J. M. J., Phaf, R. H., & Wolters, G. (1992). CALM: Categorizing and learning module. Neural Networks, 5, 55–82. CrossRef

Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872. PubMed

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Nuxoll, A., & Laird, J. E. (2004). A cognitive model of episodic memory integrated with a general cognitive architecture. In Proceedings of the international conference on cognitive modeling.

O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–972. CrossRefPubMed

Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2013). Dissecting the response in response–effect compatibility. Experimental Brain Research, 224(4), 647–655. CrossRefPubMed

Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167–201). Berlin: Springer. CrossRef

Prinz, J. (2006). Is the mind really modular? In R. Stainten (Ed.), Contemporary debates in cognitive science (pp. 22–36). New York: Blackwell.

Proctor, R. W. (2010). Playing the Simon game: Use of the Simon task for investigating human information processing. Acta Psychologica, 136, 182–188. CrossRefPubMed

Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus–response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Raffone, A., & Pantani, M. (2010). A global workspace model for phenomenal and access consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 580–596. CrossRefPubMed

Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L. D. G., & Umiltà, C. (1986). What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? Acta Psychologica, 62, 89–100. CrossRef

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (pp. 45–76). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304. CrossRefPubMed

Sternberg, S. (1969) The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.

Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68, 176–188. CrossRefPubMed

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 643–662. CrossRef

Tononi, G., Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. M. (1992). Reentry and the problem of integrating multiple cortical areas: Simulation of dynamic integration in the visual system. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 310–335. CrossRefPubMed

Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178. CrossRefPubMed

Tubau, E., Hommel, B., & López-Moliner, J. (2007). Modes of executive control in sequence learning: From stimulus-based to plan-based control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 43–63. CrossRef

Umiltà, C., & Zorzi, M. (1997). Commentary on Barber and O’Leary: Learning and attention in S–R compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus response compatibility (pp. 173–178). Amsterdam: North-Holland. CrossRef

Valle-Inclán, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35, 366–371. CrossRefPubMed

van Dantzig, S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2011). Acquiring contextualized concepts: A connectionist approach. Cognitive Science, 35, 1162–1189. CrossRefPubMed

van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation: Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20, 1473–1477. CrossRefPubMed

Wallace, R. A. (1971). S–R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360. CrossRefPubMed

Wang, X. J. (1999). Synaptic basis of cortical persistent activity: The importance of NMDA receptors to working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 9587–9603. PubMed

Ward, R. (1999). Interactions between perception and action systems: a model for selective action. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ward, R. (2002). Coordination and integration in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIV. Oxford: Oxford Press.

Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. CrossRefPubMed

Wickens, J., Hyland, B., & Anson, G. (1994). Cortical cell assemblies: A possible mechanism for motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 66–82. CrossRefPubMed

Wilson, H., & Cowan, J. (1972). Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysics Journal, 12, 1–24. CrossRef

Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217. CrossRefPubMed

Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2009). How you move is what you see: Action planning biases selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755–1769. PubMed

Young, M. P. (1995). Open questions about the neural mechanisms of visual pattern recognition. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: Bradford.

Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193–205. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: HiTEC: a connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning
Auteurs:: Pascal Haazebroek
Antonino Raffone
Bernhard Hommel
Publicatiedatum: 12-09-2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0803-0
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Tijdschrift: Psychological Research An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Uitgave 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2017

Reading sentences describing high- or low-pitched auditory events: only pianists show evidence for a horizontal space-pitch association

Approaching behavior reduces gender differences in the mental rotation performance

Do experts see it in slow motion? Altered timing of action simulation uncovers domain-specific perceptual processing in expert athletes

Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self–other distinction

Erratum to: No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching

How serially organized working memory information interacts with timing