Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

03-06-2021 | Empirical Research

Heterogeneity of Social Marginalization in Early Adolescence: Longitudinal Associations with Behavioral and Social Adjustment

Auteurs: Kate E. Norwalk, Helen M. Milojevich, Molly Dawes, Jill V. Hamm, Thomas W. Farmer

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 11/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Integration into formal and informal peer groups is a key developmental task during early adolescence. As youth begin to place greater value on attaining acceptance and popularity among peers, social status among one’s peer group becomes an important marker of social functioning during this developmental period. Whereas much empirical research has been devoted to understanding heterogeneity among youth holding high status positions, similar distinctions have largely not been examined among socially marginalized youth. The present study sought to address this gap in the research by examining the extent to which two aspects of social marginalization, peer rejection and social network isolation, were differentially associated with trajectories of social and behavioral adjustment across two school years in early adolescence. Peer nominations were used to assess rejection, isolation, and the behavioral outcomes of interest (i.e., aggression, internalizing behaviors, and victimization), and participants self-reported the extent to which peers would come to their aid in bullying situations (i.e., peer protection from bullying). Using a longitudinal sample of early adolescents (n = 1075; 53.0% female; 47.2% White; 27.1% African American; 12.7% Hispanic) in grades 5 through 7, preliminary analyses revealed little overlap between rejection and isolation at each time point. Moreover, a series of multilevel models revealed that rejection and isolation were associated with somewhat distinct behavioral and social adjustment trajectories. Peer rejection was positively associated with peer-nominated aggression, both within and across time points, and negatively associated with prosocial behaviors. Conversely, isolation was positively associated with peer-nominated internalizing behaviors, both within and across time points. Rejection and isolation were each positively associated with peer nominations of victimization; however, only isolation was related to lower perceptions of peer protection from bullying. In general, support was found for assessing rejection and isolation as two distinct forms of social marginalization in early adolescence.
Literatuur
go back to reference Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. 00333123/87/0900 SS01 00333123/87/0900 SS01 00333123/87/0900 SS01 00333123/87/0900 SS01 $00.75/0.75/0.75/0.75/0.CrossRef Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. 00333123/87/0900 SS01 00333123/87/0900 SS01 00333123/87/0900 SS01 00333123/87/0900 SS01 $00.75/0.75/0.75/0.75/0.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 74–103). New York: Wiley. Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 74–103). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S. D., & Gariepy, J. L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823. O012-1649/88/SO0.75.CrossRef Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S. D., & Gariepy, J. L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823. O012-1649/88/SO0.75.CrossRef
go back to reference Cairns, R. B., Leung, M. C., Buchanan, L., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Development, 66, 1330–1345.CrossRef Cairns, R. B., Leung, M. C., Buchanan, L., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Development, 66, 1330–1345.CrossRef
go back to reference Cillessen, A. H. N. (2011). Toward a theory of popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (p. 273–299). The Guilford Press. Cillessen, A. H. N. (2011). Toward a theory of popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (p. 273–299). The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child development, 75, 147–163.CrossRef Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child development, 75, 147–163.CrossRef
go back to reference Coie, J. D. (1990). Towards a theory of peer rejection. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 365–398). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Coie, J. D. (1990). Towards a theory of peer rejection. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 365–398). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.CrossRef Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.CrossRef
go back to reference Farmer, T. W., & Rodkin, P. C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5, 174–188.CrossRef Farmer, T. W., & Rodkin, P. C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5, 174–188.CrossRef
go back to reference Gest, S. D., Davidson, A. J., Rulison, K. L., Moody, J., & Welsh, J. A. (2007). Features of groups and status hierarchies in girls’ and boys’ early adolescent peer networks. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 118, 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.200.CrossRef Gest, S. D., Davidson, A. J., Rulison, K. L., Moody, J., & Welsh, J. A. (2007). Features of groups and status hierarchies in girls’ and boys’ early adolescent peer networks. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 118, 43–60. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cd.​200.CrossRef
go back to reference Harter, S. (2012). Emerging self-processes during childhood and adolescence. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 680–715). The Guilford Press. Harter, S. (2012). Emerging self-processes during childhood and adolescence. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 680–715). The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Hooijsma, M., Huitsing, G., Kisfalusi, D., Dijkstra, J. K., Flache, A., & Veenstra, R. (2020). Multidimensional similarity in multiplex networks: friendships between same-and cross gender bullies and same-and cross-gender victims. Network Science, 8, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2020.1.CrossRef Hooijsma, M., Huitsing, G., Kisfalusi, D., Dijkstra, J. K., Flache, A., & Veenstra, R. (2020). Multidimensional similarity in multiplex networks: friendships between same-and cross gender bullies and same-and cross-gender victims. Network Science, 8, 79–96. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1017/​nws.​2020.​1.CrossRef
go back to reference Leung, M. C. (1996). Social networks and self-enhancement in Chinese children: a comparison of self reports and peer reports of group membership. Social Development, 6, 146–157.CrossRef Leung, M. C. (1996). Social networks and self-enhancement in Chinese children: a comparison of self reports and peer reports of group membership. Social Development, 6, 146–157.CrossRef
go back to reference McDonald, K. L., & Asher, S. R. (2018). Peer acceptance, peer rejection, and popularity: Social cognitive and behavioral perspectives. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (p. 429–446). The Guilford Press. McDonald, K. L., & Asher, S. R. (2018). Peer acceptance, peer rejection, and popularity: Social cognitive and behavioral perspectives. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (p. 429–446). The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Mikami, A. Y., Lerner, M. D., & Lun, J. (2010). Social context influences on children’s rejection by their peers. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 123–130.CrossRef Mikami, A. Y., Lerner, M. D., & Lun, J. (2010). Social context influences on children’s rejection by their peers. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 123–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, J. G, Rubin, K. H, Erath, S. A, Wojslawowicz, J. C. & & & Buskirk, A. A. In: In D. Cicchetti D. J. Cohen, (eds.) 2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: a developmental psychopathology perspective. Developmental psychopathology. (10.1002/9780470939383.ch12. (pp. 419–493). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Parker, J. G, Rubin, K. H, Erath, S. A, Wojslawowicz, J. C. & & & Buskirk, A. A. In: In D. Cicchetti D. J. Cohen, (eds.) 2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: a developmental psychopathology perspective. Developmental psychopathology. (10.1002/9780470939383.ch12. (pp. 419–493). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
go back to reference Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist, 37, 151–163. 10.1207/S15326985EP3703_2.CrossRef Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist, 37, 151–163. 10.1207/S15326985EP3703_2.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Ecological settings and processes. 7th ed. (pp. 175–222). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Ecological settings and processes. 7th ed. (pp. 175–222). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
go back to reference Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annuls of Statistics, 6, 461–464. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annuls of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
go back to reference Song, S. Y. (2005). Protective Peer Ecology Scale: Middle School. Unpublished measure, Yale Child Study Center. Song, S. Y. (2005). Protective Peer Ecology Scale: Middle School. Unpublished measure, Yale Child Study Center.
go back to reference van den Berg, Y. H., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2015). Identifying subtypes of peer status by combining popularity and preference: A cohort-sequential approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 1108–1137.CrossRef van den Berg, Y. H., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2015). Identifying subtypes of peer status by combining popularity and preference: A cohort-sequential approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 1108–1137.CrossRef
go back to reference Veenstra, R., & Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics: A tool to examine selection and influence processes. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 598–619). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Veenstra, R., & Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics: A tool to examine selection and influence processes. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 598–619). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Witvliet, M., van Lier, P. A., Brendgen, M., Koot, H. M., & Vitaro, F. (2010). Longitudinal associations between clique membership status and internalizing and externalizing problems during late childhood. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9426-x.CrossRef Witvliet, M., van Lier, P. A., Brendgen, M., Koot, H. M., & Vitaro, F. (2010). Longitudinal associations between clique membership status and internalizing and externalizing problems during late childhood. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 693–704. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10802-010-9426-x.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Heterogeneity of Social Marginalization in Early Adolescence: Longitudinal Associations with Behavioral and Social Adjustment
Auteurs
Kate E. Norwalk
Helen M. Milojevich
Molly Dawes
Jill V. Hamm
Thomas W. Farmer
Publicatiedatum
03-06-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01457-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2021

Journal of Youth and Adolescence 11/2021 Naar de uitgave