Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Multiple studies have shown that Multisystemic Therapy (MST) is, at group level, an effective treatment for adolescents showing serious externalizing problem behavior. The current study expands previous research on MST by, first, examining whether subgroups of participants who respond differently to treatment could be identified. Second, we investigated if the different trajectories of change during MST could be predicted by individual (hostile attributions) and contextual (parental sense of parenting competence and deviant and prosocial peer involvement) pre-treatment factors. Participants were 147 adolescents (mean age = 15.91 years, 104 (71%) boys) and their parents who received MST. Pre-treatment assessment of the predictors and 5 monthly assessments of externalizing behavior during treatment took place using both adolescent and parents’ self-reports. Six distinct subgroups, showing different trajectories of change in externalizing problem behavior during MST, were identified. Two of the 6 trajectories of change showed a poor treatment response, as one class did not change in externalizing problem behavior and the other class even increased. The remaining 4 trajectories displayed a positive effect of MST, by showing a decrease in externalizing behavior. Most of these trajectories could be predicted by parental sense of parenting competence. Additionally, lower involvement with prosocial peers was a predictor of the group that appeared to be resistant to MST. Adolescents do respond differently to MST, which indicates the importance of personalizing treatment. Protective factors, such as parental sense of parenting competence and prosocial peers, seem to require additional attention in the first phase of MST.
Abidin, R. R. (1983). Parenting stress index: manual. Charlottesville: Pediatric Psychology Press.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: three-step approaches using M plus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 329–341. CrossRef
Asscher, J. J., Deković, M., Manders, W. A., Van der Laan, P. H., & Prins, P. J. M. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of Multisystemic therapy in the Netherlands: post-treatment changes and moderator effects. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 196–187. CrossRef
Bailey, C. A., & Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 713–722. CrossRef
Boxer, P., Kubik, J., Ostermann, M., & Veysey, B. (2015). Gang involvement moderates the effectiveness of evidence-based intervention for justice involved youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 52, 26–33. CrossRef
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (1997). Self-efficacy and parenting quality: findings and future applications. Developmental Review, 18, 47–85. CrossRef
Connell, A. M., & Frye, A. A. (2006). Growth mixture modelling in developmental psychology: overview and demonstration of heterogeneity in developmental trajectories of adolescent antisocial behaviour. Infant and Child Development, 15, 609–621. CrossRef
Galatzer-Levy, I. R., Brown, A. D., Henn-Haase, C., Metzler, T. J., Neylan, T. C., & Marmar, C. R. (2013). Positive and negative emotion prospectively predict trajectories of resilience and distress among high-exposure police officers. Emotion, 15, 545–553. CrossRef
Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Reviews, 60, 549–576.
Henggeler, S. W., Rowland, M. D., Randall, J., Ward, D. M., Pickrel, S. G., Phillippe, M. P. H., et al. (1999). Home-based Multisystemic therapy as an alternative to the hospitalization of youths in psychiatric crisis: clinical outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1331–1339. CrossRefPubMed
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 302–317. CrossRef
Kellam, S. G., Wang, W., Mackenzie, A. C. L., Hendricks Brown, C., Ompad, D. C., Or, F., et al. (2014). The impact of the good behavior game, a universal classroom-based preventive intervention in first and second grades, on high-risk sexual behaviors and drug abuse and dependence disorders into young adulthood. Prevention Science, 15, S6–S18. CrossRefPubMed
Muthén, B. (2000). Methodological issues in random coefficient growth modelling using a latent variable framework : application to the development of heavy drinking. In J. Rose, L. Chassin, L. C. Presson, & J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: new method for new questions (pp. 113–140). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891. CrossRef
Muthén, B., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modelling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267-316.
Na, C., Loughran, T. A., & Paternoster, R. (2015). On the importance of treatment effect heterogeneity in experimentally-evaluated criminal justice interventions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 289–310. CrossRef
Pereira, A. I., Muris, P., Mendonça, D., Barros, L., Goes, A. R., & Marques, T. (2016). Parental involvement in cognitive-behavioral intervention for anxious children: parents’ in-session and out-session activities and their relationship with treatment outcome. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 47, 113–123. CrossRefPubMed
Simpson, D. D., & McBride, A. A. (1992). Family, friends, and self (FFS) assessment scales for Mexican American youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 14, 327–340. CrossRef
Stepp, S. D., Pardini, D. A., Loeber, R., & Morris, N. A. (2011). The relations between adolescent social competence and young adult delinquency and educational attainment among at-risk youth: the mediating role of peer delinquency. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 457–465. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Weerman, F. M., & Smeenk, W. H. (2005). Peer similarity in delinquency of different types of friends: a comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology, 43, 499–524. CrossRef
- Heterogeneity in Response during Multisystemic Therapy: Exploring Subgroups and Predictors
Esther C. A. Mertens
Jessica J. Asscher
Willeke A. Manders
- Springer US