Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
Verleden, heden en toekomst van het lichamelijk onderzoek hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

20. Het oriënterend buikonderzoek

Auteurs : Drs. M. J. T. Gerhardus, Drs. R. J. M. Claessen, Drs. L. L. F. G. Valke, Dr. K. Duitscher-Fransen, Prof. dr. E. P. Moll van Charante

Gepubliceerd in: Fysische diagnostiek

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

Het oriënterend buikonderzoek wordt systematisch uitgevoerd in de volgorde: inspectie, auscultatie, percussie en palpatie. De in dit hoofdstuk beschreven onderdelen behoren tot het oriënterend onderzoek van de buik waarbij op indicatie verder onderzoek kan worden verricht. Hierbij is er aandacht voor de huid en buikwand, en de inwendige organen en bloedvaten. Speciale aandacht is er voor percussie en palpatie van de lever en de milt.
vorige hoofdstuk De anatomie van de buik en buikorganen
volgende hoofdstuk Het buikonderzoek op indicatie
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Vizioli LH, Winckler FD, Da Luz LC, et al. Abdominal palpation does not modify the number of bowel sounds in healthy volunteers and gastrointestinal outpatients. Am J Med Sci. 2020;360(4):378–82.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Krebber ThFWA, Havas J. Het onderzoek van de buik. Lege artis – Vaardigheden in de geneeskunde. Utrecht: Bunge; 1994.
3.
Bohner H, Yang Q, Franke C, et al. Simple data from history and physical examination help to exclude bowel obstruction and to avoid radiographic studies in patients with acute abdominal pain. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:777–84.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Hamer JPM, Pieper PG, Van den Brink RBA. Anamnese en lichamelijk onderzoek van hart en perifere arteriën. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2014.CrossRef
5.
Zuin M, Rigatelli G, Andreotti AN, Fogato L, Roncon L. Is abdominal auscultation a still relevant part of the physical examination? Eur J Intern Med. 2017;43:e24–5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Felder S, Margel D, Murrell Z, Fleshner P. Usefulness of bowel sound auscultation: a prospective evaluation. J Surg Educ. 2014;71:768–73.PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
9.
10.
Vasseur C, Devroede G, Dalle D, et al. Postprandial bowel sounds. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1975;22:443–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Politzer JP, Devroede G, Vasseur C, et al. The genesis of bowel sounds: influence of viscous and gastrointestinal content. Gastroenterology. 1976;71:282–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
McGee SR. Evidence-based physical diagnosis. 3e druk. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2012.
13.
14.
15.
McLoughlin MJ, Colapinto RJ, Hobbs BB. Abdominal bruits. Clinical and angiographic correlation JAMA. 1975;232:1238–42.PubMed
16.
Carmichael DJ, Mathias CJ, Snell ME, Peart S. Detection and investigation of renal artery stenosis. Lancet. 1986;1(8482):667–70.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Julius S, Stewart BH. Diagnostic significance of abdominal murmurs. N Engl J Med. 1967;276:1175–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Krijnen P, Van Jaarsveld BC, Steyerberg EW, et al. A clinical prediction rule for renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:705–11.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Lederle FA, Walker JM, Reinke DB. Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms with physical examination and ultrasound. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:1753–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Fink HA, Lederle FA, Roth CS, et al. The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:833–6.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Okamoto M, Hashimoto M, Sueda T, et al. Renal artery aneurysm: the significance of abdominal bruit and use of color Doppler. Intern Med. 1992;31:1217–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
24.
Sarr MG, Dickson ER, Newcomer AD. Diastolic bruit in chronic intestinal ischemia. Recognition by abdominal phonoangiography. Dig Dis Sci. 1980;25:761–2.
25.
Mensink PBF, Moons LMG, Kuipers EJ. Chronic gastrointestinal ischaemia: shifting paradigms. Gut. 2011;60(5):722–37.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Grim CE, Luft FC, Weinberger MH, Grim CM. Sensitivity and specificity of screening tests for renal vascular hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91:617–22.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Hunter SA, Brimble J, Weatherall M, Galletly DC. Agreement of clinical measurements of liver size with ultrasound when performed by medical students. N Z Med J. 2014;127(1405):61–9.PubMed
28.
Huelsen A, Fischer J, Hegarty J, et al. The scratch test for identifying the lower liver edge is at least as accurate as percussion and is significantly more effective for young trainees-a randomised comparative trial. N Z Med J. 2016;129(1446):53–63.PubMed
29.
30.
31.
Zoli M, Magalotti D, Grimaldi M, et al. Physical examination of the liver: is it still worth it? Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1428–32.PubMed
32.
Patzak M, Porzner M, Oeztuerk S, et al.; EMIL Study Group. Assessment of liver size by ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014;42(7):399–404.
33.
Drenthe-Schonk A, Heineman E. Het onderzoek van de buik. Serie Vaardigheden in de Geneeskunde. Maastricht: Mediview; 2004.
34.
Kramer WLM. Handleiding chirurgisch onderzoek. 3e druk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2006.
35.
Levi M, Schreuder MCJ, Hart W. Fysische diagnostiek – percussie en palpatie van de lever. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000;144:835–8.PubMed
36.
Loloi J, Ankit Patel LJ, McDevitt M, Bruno MA, Riley T. How strongly do physical examination estimates and ultrasonographic measurements of liver size correlate? A prospective study. Am J Med. 2019;132(1):103–8.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Tamayo SG, Rickman LS, Mathews WC, et al. Examiner dependence on physical diagnostic tests for the detection of splenomegaly: a prospective study with multiple observers. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:69–75.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Grover SA, Barkun AN, Sackett DL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have splenomegaly? JAMA 1993;270:2218–21.
39.
Barkun AN, Camus M, Green L, et al. The bedside assessment of splenic enlargement. Am J Med. 1991;91:512–8.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Barkun AN, Camus M, Meagher T, et al. Splenic enlargement and Traube’s space: how useful is percussion? Am J Med. 1989;87:562–6.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Hershfield NB. The abdominal wall. A frequently overlooked source of abdominal pain. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;14:199–202.
42.
Rostas J, Cason B, Simmons J, et al. The validity of abdominal examination in blunt trauma patients with distracting injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(6):1095–100; discussion 1100-1.
43.
Lederle FA, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA 1999;281:77–82.
44.
Venkatasubramaniam AK, Mehta T, Chetter IC, et al. The value of abdominal examination in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27(1):56–60.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Lynch RM. Accuracy of abdominal examination in the diagnosis of non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004;12:99–107.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Joshi R, Singh A, Jajoo N, et al. Accuracy and reliability of palpation and percussion for detecting hepatomegaly: a rural hospital-based study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004;23:171–4.PubMed
47.
Rosenfield AT, Laufer I, Schneider PB. The significance of a palpable liver. A correlation of clinical and radioisotope studies. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1974;122:313–7.
48.
Swartz MH. Textbook of physical diagnosis, history and examination. 7e druk. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2014.
49.
Shapira Y, Porter A, Wurzel M, et al. Evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation severity: echocardiographic and clinical correlation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11:652–9.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Coralli RJ, Crawley IS. Hepatic pulsations in constrictive pericarditis. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:370–3.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Cessford T, Meneilly GS, Arishenkoff S, et al. Comparing physical examination with sonographic versions of the same examination techniques for splenomegaly. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(7):1621–9.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Godfried MH, Briët E. Fysische diagnostiek. Percussie en palpatie van de milt. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000;144:216–9.
53.
Verghese A, Krish G, Karnad A. Ludwig Traube. The man and his space. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:701–3.
54.
55.
Castell DO. The spleen percussion sign. A useful diagnostic technique. Ann Intern Med. 1967;67:1265–7.
56.
Sapira JD. The art and science of bedside diagnosis. In: Orient JM, editors, The abdomen, chapter 20. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1990.
57.
58.
Chow KU, Luxembourg B, Seifried E, Bonig H. Spleen size is significantly influenced by body height and sex: establishment of normal values for spleen size at us with a cohort of 1,200 healthy individuals. Radiology. 2016;279(1):306–13.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Het oriënterend buikonderzoek
Auteurs
Drs. M. J. T. Gerhardus
Drs. R. J. M. Claessen
Drs. L. L. F. G. Valke
Dr. K. Duitscher-Fransen
Prof. dr. E. P. Moll van Charante
Copyright
2022
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Fysische diagnostiek

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2786-7

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2787-4

Copyright: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2787-4_20