Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

5. Het meten van kwetsbaarheid (theorie)

Auteur : Nienke de Vries

Gepubliceerd in: Werken met thuiswonende kwetsbare ouderen

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

De manier waarop kwetsbaarheid in meetinstrumenten geoperationaliseerd wordt, is sterk afhankelijk van het onderliggende theoretische concept. Twee uitersten in denkwijze zijn de methoden die kwetsbaarheid benaderen als een medisch syndroom en benaderingen waarbij kwetsbaarheid gezien wordt als een risk factor approach, het idee van opeenstapeling van tekorten. Tussen deze twee uitersten zijn veel variaties mogelijk. Een groot gedeelte van de meetinstrumenten heeft enkele factoren geselecteerd die vanuit het gebruikte theoretische concept geacht worden het meest voorspellend te zijn voor kwetsbaarheid. In een tabel wordt een (niet uitputtend) overzicht gegeven van een aantal internationaal meest toegepaste meetinstrumenten op het gebied van kwetsbaarheid en meetinstrumenten die inzicht geven in de grote variatie ten aanzien van de inhoud en uitvoering van de verschillende metingen. Drie veel gebruikte methoden om kwetsbaarheid te meten, worden in meer detail besproken.

vorige hoofdstuk De ISCOPE-methode (praktijk)

volgende hoofdstuk Zorg uit Voorzorg (praktijk)

Andreasen J, Lund H, Aadahl M, Gobbens RJ, Sorensen EE. Content validation of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator from the perspective of frail elderly. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics: A qualitative explorative study; 2015.

Bagnall NM, Faiz O, Darzi A, Athanasiou T. What is the utility of preoperative frailty assessment for risk stratification in cardiac surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thoracic Surg. 2013;17(2):398–402.CrossRef

Boyd CM, Xue QL, Simpson CF, Guralnik JM, Fried LP. Frailty, hospitalization, and progression of disability in a cohort of disabled older women. Am J Med. 2005;118(11):1225–31.CrossRefPubMed

Carlson JE, Zocchi KA, Bettencourt DM, et al. Measuring frailty in the hospitalized elderly: concept of functional homeostasis. Am J Phy Med Rehabil/Assoc Acad Physiatrists. 1998;77(3):252–7.CrossRef

Chin APMJ, Dekker JM, Feskens EJ, Schouten EG, Kromhout D. How to select a frail elderly population? A comparisonof three working definitions. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(11):1015–21.CrossRef

Choi J, Ahn A, Kim S, Won CW. Global Prevalence of Physical Frailty by Fried’s Criteria in Community-Dwelling Elderly With National Population-Based Surveys. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(7):548–50.CrossRefPubMed

Cigolle CT, Ofstedal MB, Tian Z, Blaum CS. Comparing models of frailty: the Health and Retirement Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(5):830–9.CrossRefPubMed

Ensrud KE, Ewing SK, Taylor BC, et al. Frailty and risk of falls, fracture, and mortality in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J G Ser A, Biol. Sci. Med Sci. 2007;62(7):744–51.

Freitag S, Schmidt S, Gobbens RJ. Tilburg frailty indicator : German translation and psychometric testing. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2015;49(2):86–93.CrossRefPubMed

Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.CrossRefPubMed

Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol Ser A, Biol Sci. Med. Sci. 2004;59(3):255–63.

Gobbens RJ, Assen MA van, Luijkx KG, Schols JM. Testing an integral conceptual model of frailty. J Adv Nurs. 2011.

Gobbens RJ, Assen MA van, Luijkx KG, Schols JM. The predictive validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: disability, health care utilization, and quality of life in a population at risk. Gerontologist 2012;52(5):619–31.

Gobbens RJ, Assen MA van, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. Determinants of frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010e;11(5):356–64.

Gobbens RJ, Assen MA van, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Directors Assoc 2010a;11(5):344–55.

Gobbens RJ, Assen MA van, Schalk MJ. The prediction of disability by self-reported physical frailty components of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI). Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2014;59(2):280–87.

Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Assen MA van. Explaining quality of life of older people in the Netherlands using a multidimensional assessment of frailty. Qua Life Res.: Int J Qual Life Aspects Treat, Care Rehabil 2013;22(8):2051–61.

Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. Toward a conceptual definition of frail community dwelling older people. NursOutlook. 2010b;58(2):76–86.

Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. Towards an integral conceptual model of frailty. J Nutr Health Age. 2010c;14(3):175–81.CrossRef

Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. In search of an integral conceptual definition of frailty: opinions of experts. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010d;11(5):338–43.CrossRefPubMed

Joseph B, Pandit V, Rhee P, et al. Predicting hospital discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients: is frailty the answer? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(1):196–200.CrossRefPubMed

Kiely DK, Cupples LA, Lipsitz LA. Validation and comparison of two frailty indexes: The MOBILIZE Boston Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(9):1532–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Makizako H, Shimada H, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Suzuki T. Impact of physical frailty on disability in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2015;5(9):e008462.

McGee HM, O’Hanlon A, Barker M, et al. Vulnerable older people in the community: relationship between the Vulnerable Elders Survey and health service use. Jo Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(1):8–15.CrossRef

Metzelthin SF, Daniëls R, Rossum E van, et al. A nurse-led interdisciplinary primary care approach to prevent disability among community-dwelling frail older people: a large-scale process evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013a;50(9):1184–1196.

Metzelthin SF, Rossum E van, Hendriks MR, et al. Reducing disability in community-dwelling frail older people: cost-effectiveness study alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial. Age Age. 2015;44(3):390–396.

Metzelthin SF, Rossum E van, Witte LP de, et al. Effectiveness of interdisciplinary primary care approach to reduce disability in community dwelling frail older people: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2013b;347:f5264.

Mitnitski ABM. The mortality rate as a function of accumulated deficits in a frailty index. Mech Age Dev. 2002;123(11):Sep.

Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci World J. 2001;1:323–36.CrossRef

Mitnitski AB, Song X, Rockwood K. The estimation of relative fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults using self-report data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(6):M627–32.CrossRefPubMed

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res: Int J Qual Life Aspects Treat, Care Rehabil. 2010;19(4):539–49.CrossRef

Mulasso A, Roppolo M, Gobbens RJ, Rabaglietti E. The Italian Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Analysis of Psychometric Properties. Research on aging 2015.

Op het Veld LP, Rossum E van, Kempen GI, Vet HC de, Hajema K, Beurskens AJ. Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:77.

Puts MT, Lips P, Deeg DJ. Sex differences in the risk of frailty for mortality independent of disability and chronic diseases. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(1):40–7.CrossRefPubMed

Ravaglia G, Forti P, Lucicesare A, Pisacane N, Rietti E, Patterson C. Development of an easy prognostic score for frailty outcomes in the aged. Age Age. 2008;37(2):161–6.CrossRef

Ravindrarajah R, Lee DM, Pye SR, et al. The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality: results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;57(3):360–8.CrossRefPubMed

Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A. A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol Ser A, Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(7):738–43.CrossRef

Schuurmans H, Steverink N, Lindenberg S, Frieswijk N, Slaets JP. Old or frail: what tells us more? J Gerontol Ser A, Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(9):M962–5.CrossRef

Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008;8:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shamliyan T, Talley KM, Ramakrishnan R, Kane RL. Association of frailty with survival: a systematic literature review. Age Res Rev. 2013;12(2):719–36.CrossRef

Singh I, Gallacher J, Davis K, Johansen A, Eeles E, Hubbard RE. Predictors of adverse outcomes on an acute geriatric rehabilitation ward. Age and Age. 2012;41(2):242–6.CrossRef

Stel VS, Smit JH, Pluijm SM, Visser M, Deeg DJ, Lips P. Comparison of the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(3):252–8.CrossRefPubMed

Studenski S, Hayes RP, Leibowitz RQ, et al. Clinical Global Impression of Change in Physical Frailty: development of a measure based on clinical judgment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(9):1560–6.CrossRefPubMed

Sutton JF, Gould RL, Daley S, Coulson MC, Ward EV, Butler AM, Nunn SP, Howard RJ. Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review. BMC Geriatrics. 2016;16:55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Theou O, Cann L, Blodgett J, Wallace LM, Brothers TD, Rockwood K. Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: Systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the Survey of Health. Age Retirement Eur Age Res Rev. 2015;21:78–94.CrossRef

Vries NM de, Ravensberg CD van, Hobbelen JS, et al. The Coach2Move Approach: Development and Acceptability of an Individually Tailored Physical Therapy Strategy to Increase Activity Levels in Older Adults With Mobility Problems. J Geriatr Phys Ther (2001) 2015b.

Vries NM de, Staal JB, Ravensberg CD van, Hobbelen JS, Olde Rikkert MG, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Age Res Rev. 2011;10(1):104–14.

Vries NM de, Staal JB, Olde Rikkert MG, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Evaluative frailty index for physical activity (EFIP): a reliable and valid instrument to measure changes in level of frailty. Phy Ther. 2013;93(4):551–61.

Vries NM de, Staal JB, Wees PJ van, Adang EMM, Akkermans R, Olde Rikkert MGM, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG. Patient- centered care is effective in improving physical activity in frail elderly: a randomized controlled trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Press. 2015. ePub ahead of print.

Woo J, Leung J, Morley JE. Comparison of frailty indicators based on clinical phenotype and the multiple deficit approach in predicting mortality and physical limitation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1478–86.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Het meten van kwetsbaarheid (theorie)
Auteur: Nienke de Vries
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Werken met thuiswonende kwetsbare ouderen
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1155-2

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1156-9

Copyright: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1156-9_5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen