Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2007 | Artikel

Het actiesociogram als methode voor assessment van hechtingsbelevingen bij kinderen

Auteurs: Let Dillen, Mieke Jespers, Leni Verhofstadt-Denève

Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie | Uitgave 3/2007

Abstract

De afgelopen decennia is het onderzoek naar gehechtheid (attachment) enorm toegenomen. Deze expansie zorgde voor verdere empirische ondersteuning van het gehechtheidsconcept en belichtte de potentiële implicaties ervan voor de klinische praktijk. Desondanks staat het wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar hechting in de basisschoolleeftijd nog in de kinderschoenen. Dit komt onder meer door het ontbreken van een diagnostisch instrument dat aansluit bij de eigenheid van deze leeftijdsgroep. In een poging om tegemoet te komen aan dit tekort wordt hier het actiesociogram voorgesteld. Bij deze methode ligt de nadruk op actiegerichte exploratie van de zelfbeleving in de gezinscontext. Vanuit theoretisch en praktisch oogpunt illustreren we hoe het actiesociogram – met gebruikmaking van poppen en actie – mogelijkheden biedt om op efficiënte en kindgerichte wijze de kwaliteit van hechtingsbelevingen te meten.

vorige artikel Inleiding

volgende artikel Narcisme, alcoholisme en tegenoverdracht

DR staat voor director, de psychodramatische term voor de psychotherapeut of hier de diagnosticus.

Voorbeelden van vragen aan de handpop Croco: ‘Croco, wie vind jij (naam van kind) aardig of lief?’ of ‘Croco, zou jij hem/haar beter willen maken?’ enzovoort.

Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1985). Attachments across the life span. The Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 61, 792-812.

Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709-716.CrossRefPubMed

Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1990). Some considerations regarding theory and assessment relevant to attachments beyond infancy. In M.T. Greenbert, D. Cicchetti & F.M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in preschool years: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 463-488). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment, a psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ammaniti, M., IJzendoorn, M.H. van, Speranza, A.M., & Tambelli, R. (2000). Internal working models of attachment during late childhood and early adolescence: an exploration of stability and change. Attachment & Human Development, 2, 328-346.CrossRef

Armsden, G.C., & Greenberg, M.T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427-454.CrossRef

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. Vol. 3. Loss. New York: Basic Books.

Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1. Attachment (2^nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

Bretherton, I. (1990). Open communication and internal working models: their role in the development of attachment relationships. In R.A. Thompson (Ed.), Socioemotional development. Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 38 (pp. 57-114). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K.A. (1999). Internal Working models in attachment relationships: a construct revisited. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment. Theory, Research and Clinical Applications (pp. 89-111). New York/Londen: Guilford Press.

Cassidy, J. (1988). Child-mother attachment and the self in six-year-olds. Child development, 59, 121- 134.CrossRefPubMed

Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child’s ties. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment. Theory, Research and Clinical Applications (pp. 3-20). New York: Guilford.

Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P.R. (1999). Handbook of Attachment. Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. New York/Londen: Guilford Press.

Dillen, L., & Serneels, A. (2002). De relatie van psychodrama tot psychosociaal welbevinden: een effectiviteitsstudie bij jong-volwassenen. Ongepubliceerde licentiaatverhandeling, Universiteit Gent.

Dillen, L., Siongers, M., Helskens, D., & Verhofstadt-Denève, L. (in druk). When puppets speak: Dialectical psychodrama within developmental child psychotherapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology.

Dwyer, K.M. (2005). The meaning and measurement of attachment in middle and late childhood. Human Development, 48, 155-182.CrossRef

Easterbrooks, M.A., & Abeles, R. (2000). Windows to the self in 8-year-olds: Bridges to attachment representation and behavioral adjustment. Attachment & Human Development, 2, 85-106.CrossRef

Fonagy, P. (1999). Transgenerational consistencies of attachment: A new theory. Paper to the developmental and psychoanalytic discussion group. American Psychoanalytic Association Meeting, Washington, DC.

Fonagy, P. (2001). Attachment theory and psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.

Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002), Affect regulation, mentalisation and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.

Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: their role in self organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 679-700.CrossRefPubMed

Fury, G., Carlson, E.A., & Sroufe, A. (1997). Children’s representation of attachment relationships in family drawings. Child Development, 68, 1154-1164.CrossRefPubMed

George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1996). The adult attachment interview protocol, 3rd edition. Unpublished manuscript. Dept. of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.

Gopnik, A. (1993). How we know our minds: The illustration of the first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 1-14.CrossRef

Granot, D., & Mayseless, O. (2001). Attachment security and adjustment to school in middle childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 530-541.CrossRef

Green, J., Stanley, C., Smith, V., & Goldwyn, R. (2000). A new method of evaluating attachment representations in young school-age children: The Manchester child attachment story task. Attachment & Human Development, 2, 48-70.CrossRef

Gullone, E., & Robinson, K. (2005). The inventory of parent and peer attachment-revised (IPPA-R) for children: A psychometric investigation. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 67-79.CrossRef

James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.

Jespers, M. (2004). Het sociaal atoom als assessmentmethode voor hechtingbelevingen bij kinderen. Ongepubliceerde licentiaatverhandeling, Universiteit Gent.

Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). Children’s internal representations of attachment as seen in family drawings and in separation anxiety interview. In M. Main (Chair), Attachment: a move to the level of representation. Symposium presented at the meeting of Society for research in child development, Toronto, april.

Karavasilis, L., Doyle, A.B., & Markiewicz, D. (2003). Associations between parenting style and attachment to mother in middle childhood and adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 153-164.CrossRef

Kerns, K.A., Aspelmeier, J.E., Gentzler, A.L., & Gabrill, C.M. (2001). Parent-child attachment and monitoring in middle childhood. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 69-81.CrossRefPubMed

Kerns, K.A., Klepac, L., & Cole, A. (1996). Peer relations and preadolescents perceptions of security in the child-mother relationship. Developmental Psychology, 32, 457-466.CrossRef

Kerns, K.A., Schlegelmilch, A., Morgan, T.A., & Abraham, M.M. (2005). Assessing attachment in middle childhood. In K.A. Kerns, & R.A. Richardson, Attachment in middle childhood (pp. 46-70). New York/Londen: Guilford Press.

Kerns, K.A., Tomich, P.L., Aspelmeier, J.E., & Contreras, J.M. (2000). Attachment-based assessments of parent-child relationships in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 36, 614-626.CrossRefPubMed

Madigan, S., Ladd, M., & Goldberg, S. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: children’s representations of family as indicators of early attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 5, 19-37.CrossRef

Main, M. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) versus multiple models of attachment. Findings and directions for future research. In C.M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & P. Maris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 127-159). Londen: Routledge.

Main, M. Kaplan, N. & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points in attachment theory and research (pp. 66-104). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Marvin, R.S., & Britner, P.A. (1999). Normative development: the ontogeny of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment. Theory, Research, and Clinical applications (pp. 44- 67). New York: Guilford Press.

Mayseless, O. (2005). Ontogeny of attachment in middle childhood. In K.A. Kerns, & R.A. Richardson, Attachment in middle childhood (pp. 1-23). New York/Londen: Guilford Press.

Moreno, J.L. (1934). Who shall survive?: A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous & Mental Disease Publishing.CrossRef

Moreno, J.L. (1936). Organization of the social atom. Sociometric Review, 4, 10-13.

Murray, L., Woolgar, M., Briers, S., & Hipwell, A. (1999). Children's social representations in dolls' house play and theory of mind tasks, and their relation to family adversity and child disturbance. Social Development, 8, 179-200.CrossRef

Pianta, R.C., & Longmaid, K. (1999). Attachment-based classifications of children’s family drawings: psychometric properties and relations with children’s adjustment in kindergarten. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 244- 259.CrossRefPubMed

Remer, R. (2001). Social atom theory revisited. The International Journal of Action Methods, 54, 74-83.

Schneider, B.H., Atkinson, L., & Tardif, C. (2001). Child-parent attachment and children’s peer relations: a quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 37, 86-100.CrossRefPubMed

Shields, A., Ryan, R.M., & Cichetti, D. (2001). Narrative representations of caregivers and emotion dysregulation as predictors of maltreated children’s rejection by peers. Developmental Psychology, 37, 321-337.CrossRefPubMed

Slough, N.M., & Greenberg, M.T. (1990). Five-year-olds’ representations of separation from parents: responses from the perspective of self and others. In I. Bretherton & M.W. Watson (Eds.), Children’s perspectives on the family. Serie new directions for child development 48 (pp. 67-84). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Solomon, J., & George, C. (1999). The measurement of attachment security in infancy and childhood. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment. Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 287-318). New York: Guilford Press.

Sroufe, L.A. (1990). An organizational perspective on the self. In D. Cichetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: infancy to childhood (pp. 281-307). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Target, M., Fonagy, P., & Shmueli-Goetz, Y. (2003). Attachment representations in school-age children: the development of the child attachment interview (CAI). Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 29, 171-186.CrossRef

Verhofstadt-Denève, L. (2001a). Zelfreflectie en persoonsontwikkeling: Een handboek voor ontwikkelingsgerichte psychotherapie. Leuven/Amersfoort: Acco.

Verhofstadt-Denève, L. (2001b). Affective processes in a multivoiced self in action. In H. Bosma & S. Kunnen (Eds.), Identity and emotions: A self-organizational perspective (pp. 141-150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Verhofstadt-Denève, L. (2001c). Hoe werkt de ‘Toverwinkel’ in psychodrama? Een ontwikkelingsgerichte, existentieel-dialectische visie. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 27, 263-277.

Verhofstadt-Denève, L. (2003). The psychodramatic ‘social atom method’: Dialogical self in dialectical action. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16, 183-212.CrossRef

Verhofstadt-Denève, L., Dillen, L., Helskens, D., & Siongers, M. (2004). The psychodramatical ‘social atom method’ with children: Dialogical self in dialectical action. In H. Hermans & G. Dimaggio, The dialogical self in psychotherapy (pp. 152-170). New York: Brunner.

Verschueren, K., Buyck, P., & Marcoen, A. (2001). Self-representations and Socioemotional Competence in Young Children: A 3 year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 37, 126-134.CrossRefPubMed

Verschueren, K. & Marcoen, A. (1999). Representations of self and socioemotional competence in kindergartners: differential and combined effects of attachment to mother and to father. Child Development, 70, 183-201.CrossRefPubMed

Verschueren, K., & Marcoen, A. (2000). Gehechtheid in de kleuterleeftijd. In J.D. Bosch, H.A. Bosma, R.J. van der Gaag, A. Vyt & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaar (red.), Jaarboek ontwikkelingspsychologie, orthopedagogiek en kinderpsychiatrie, 5, 2000-2001 (pp. 294-328). Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.

Verschueren, K., Marcoen, A., & Schoefs, V. (1996). The internal working model of the self, attachment and competence in five-year-olds. Child development, 67, 2489-2511.CrossRef

Waters, E., & Cummings, E.M. (2000). A secure base from which to explore close relationships. Child Development, 71, 164-172.CrossRefPubMed

Weinfield, N.S. (2005). Assessment of attachment in middle childhood: A return to theory. Human Development, 48, 188-194.CrossRef

IJzendoorn, M.H. van, Kranenburg, M.J., Zwart-Woudstra, H.A., Busschbach, A.M. van, & Lambermon, M.W.E. (1991). Parental attachment and children’s socio-emotional development: Some findings on the validity of the adult attachment interview in the Netherlands. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 375-394.

Zevalkink, J. (2005). Het meten van gehechtheidsrepresentaties bij basisschoolleerlingen. Gehechtheidsverhalen in de klinische praktijk. Kind en Adolescent, 26, 352-367.CrossRef

Titel: Het actiesociogram als methode voor assessment van hechtingsbelevingen bij kinderen
Auteurs: Let Dillen
Mieke Jespers
Leni Verhofstadt-Denève
Publicatiedatum: 01-06-2007
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie / Uitgave 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0165-1188
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5637
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03062271

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2007

Willem Heuves (2006). Pubers. Ontwikkeling en problemen. Assen: Van Gorcum. 104 pp., € 15,–

Franny Moene & Matthijs Rümke (2004). Behandeling van de conversiestoornis. Een interdisciplinaire benadering. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum. 107 pp., € 23,50

Over gebrek aan helderheid van tegenargumenten

Reactie op ‘Onheldere onrust over DBC’s’

Inleiding

The good enough couple. Internationaal congres. Leuven, 1 en 2 juni 2006