Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Article

Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting

Auteurs: Fabio Paglieri, Anna M. Borghi, Lorenza S. Colzato, Bernhard Hommel, Claudia Scorolli

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Evidence suggests that religious systems have specific effects on attentional and action control processes. The present study investigated whether religions also modulate choices that involve higher-order knowledge and the delay of gratification in particular. We tested Dutch Calvinists, Italian Catholics, and Atheists from both countries/cultures using an intertemporal choice task where participants could choose between a small immediate and a larger delayed monetary reward. Based on the Calvinist theory of predestination and the Catholic concept of a cycle of sin–confession–expiation, we predicted a reduced delay tolerance, i.e., higher discount rate, for Italian Catholics than for Dutch Calvinists, and intermediate rates for the two atheist groups. Analyses of discount rates support our hypotheses. We also found a magnitude effect on temporal discounting and faster responses for large than for small rewards across religions and countries/cultures. We conclude that temporal discounting is specifically modulated by religious upbringing rather than by generic cultural differences.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
As one anonymous reviewer suggested, it could be argued that these results should not be explained in terms of individualism versus collectivism, but rather as resulting from the opposition between materialism versus spiritualism. The suggestion here would be to stress that the USA and China share a long tradition of materialism, whereas Japanese culture, in spite of its recent consumeristic turn, is much more rooted in metaphysical concepts like “muga-mushin” (no-self, no-mind) that transcend the boundaries of the physical self. This could help explaining why Chinese and Americans are more attracted by tempting short-term options (thus exhibiting higher delay discounting) than Japanese. Regardless of the merit of this hypothesis, the very fact that multiple interpretations of cultural differences are often possible and even plausible strengthens our point: a more precise and fine-grained understanding of what drives such differences is needed, and religious beliefs offer a very promising domain in that respect.
 
2
Due to the practical difficulties involved in testing subjects belonging to different religious groups across two countries, we were unable to have exactly the same number of participants for each group. However, we managed to keep numerical variation across groups within reasonable limits.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Berns, G., Laibson, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Intertemporal choice—toward an integrative framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 482–488.PubMedCrossRef Berns, G., Laibson, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Intertemporal choice—toward an integrative framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 482–488.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In I. Brocas & J. Carrillo (Eds.), The psychology of economic decisions (Vol. 1, pp. 105–126)., Rationality and well-being Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In I. Brocas & J. Carrillo (Eds.), The psychology of economic decisions (Vol. 1, pp. 105–126)., Rationality and well-being Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Chen, H., Ng, S., & Rao, A. (2005). Cultural differences in consumer impatience. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 291–301.CrossRef Chen, H., Ng, S., & Rao, A. (2005). Cultural differences in consumer impatience. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 291–301.CrossRef
go back to reference Colzato, L., van Beest, I., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Scorolli, C., Dorchin, S., Meiran, N., et al. (2010). God, do I have your attention? Cognition, 117, 87–94.PubMedCrossRef Colzato, L., van Beest, I., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Scorolli, C., Dorchin, S., Meiran, N., et al. (2010). God, do I have your attention? Cognition, 117, 87–94.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Curry, O., Price, M. E., & Price, J. G. (2008). Patience is a virtue: cooperative people have lower discount rates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 780–785.CrossRef Curry, O., Price, M. E., & Price, J. G. (2008). Patience is a virtue: cooperative people have lower discount rates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 780–785.CrossRef
go back to reference Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Record, 52, 479–492. Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Record, 52, 479–492.
go back to reference Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.CrossRef Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.CrossRef
go back to reference Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J., & Soutter, C. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.CrossRef Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J., & Soutter, C. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.CrossRef
go back to reference Green, L., Fry, A., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.CrossRef Green, L., Fry, A., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting. In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 67–92). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting. In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 67–92). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
go back to reference Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 418–427.PubMedCrossRef Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 418–427.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Harris, A., & Madden, G. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychological Record, 52, 429–440. Harris, A., & Madden, G. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychological Record, 52, 429–440.
go back to reference Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 simple societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–78.CrossRef Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 simple societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–18.CrossRef Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2010). Religion as a control guide: on the impact of religion on cognition. Zygon. Journal of Religion & Science, 45, 596–604. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2010). Religion as a control guide: on the impact of religion on cognition. Zygon. Journal of Religion & Science, 45, 596–604.
go back to reference Hommel, B., Colzato, L., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2011). Action control and religion: faith-specific modulation of the Simon effect but not stop-signal performance. Cognition, 120, 177–185.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Colzato, L., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2011). Action control and religion: faith-specific modulation of the Simon effect but not stop-signal performance. Cognition, 120, 177–185.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385–392.PubMedCrossRef Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385–392.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ito, M., Saeki, D., & Green, L. (2011). Sharing, discounting and selfishness: a Japanese–American comparison. The Psychological Record, 60, 59–76. Ito, M., Saeki, D., & Green, L. (2011). Sharing, discounting and selfishness: a Japanese–American comparison. The Psychological Record, 60, 59–76.
go back to reference Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129–146.CrossRef Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129–146.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2009). Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 61–73.PubMedCrossRef Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2009). Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 61–73.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kacen, J., & Lee, J. (2002). The influence of culture on consumer impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 163–176.CrossRef Kacen, J., & Lee, J. (2002). The influence of culture on consumer impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 163–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, B., Sung, Y. S., & McClure, S. (2012). The neural basis of cultural differences in delay discounting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 650–656.CrossRef Kim, B., Sung, Y. S., & McClure, S. (2012). The neural basis of cultural differences in delay discounting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 650–656.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirby, K. (1997). Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54–70.CrossRef Kirby, K. (1997). Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirby, K. (2009). One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 457–462.CrossRef Kirby, K. (2009). One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 457–462.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirby, K., & Marakovic, N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100–104.CrossRef Kirby, K., & Marakovic, N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirby, K., & Petry, N. (2004). Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. Addiction, 99, 461–471.PubMedCrossRef Kirby, K., & Petry, N. (2004). Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. Addiction, 99, 461–471.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: a cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201–206.PubMedCrossRef Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: a cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201–206.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lagorio, C. H., & Madden, G. J. (2005). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioral Processes, 69, 173–187.CrossRef Lagorio, C. H., & Madden, G. J. (2005). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioral Processes, 69, 173–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Levine, R., Norenzayan, A., & Philbrick, K. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 543–560.CrossRef Levine, R., Norenzayan, A., & Philbrick, K. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 543–560.CrossRef
go back to reference Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.CrossRef Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.CrossRef
go back to reference Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 139–145.PubMedCrossRef Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 139–145.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Madden, G., & Johnson, P. (2010). A delay-discounting primer. In G. Madden & W. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 11–37). Washington: APA.CrossRef Madden, G., & Johnson, P. (2010). A delay-discounting primer. In G. Madden & W. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 11–37). Washington: APA.CrossRef
go back to reference Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A., Mueller, A., Hehli, D., et al. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards. Part II: between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 251–261.PubMedCrossRef Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A., Mueller, A., Hehli, D., et al. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards. Part II: between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 251–261.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mahajna, A., Ben-Zion, U., Bogaire, R., & Shavit, T. (2007). Subjective discount rates among Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews. Working Papers 07–10, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics. Mahajna, A., Ben-Zion, U., Bogaire, R., & Shavit, T. (2007). Subjective discount rates among Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews. Working Papers 07–10, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
go back to reference Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.PubMedCrossRef Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McCullough, M., & Willoughby, B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69–93.PubMedCrossRef McCullough, M., & Willoughby, B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69–93.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H., & Fehr, E. (2010). Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 1858–1863.PubMedCrossRef McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H., & Fehr, E. (2010). Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 1858–1863.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moyer, R., & Bayer, R. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect. Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 228–246.CrossRef Moyer, R., & Bayer, R. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect. Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 228–246.CrossRef
go back to reference Nisbett, R., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11163–11170.CrossRef Nisbett, R., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11163–11170.CrossRef
go back to reference Nisbett, R., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467–473.PubMedCrossRef Nisbett, R., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467–473.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in Ultimatum Game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171–188.CrossRef Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in Ultimatum Game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171–188.CrossRef
go back to reference Paglieri, F. (in press). The costs of delay. Waiting vs. postponing in intertemporal choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, forthcoming. Paglieri, F. (in press). The costs of delay. Waiting vs. postponing in intertemporal choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, forthcoming.
go back to reference Petry, N. (2001). Pathological gamblers, with and without substance abuse disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 482–487.PubMedCrossRef Petry, N. (2001). Pathological gamblers, with and without substance abuse disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 482–487.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rachlin, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rachlin, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. (2008). Social discounting and delay discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 29–43.CrossRef Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. (2008). Social discounting and delay discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 29–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Rachlin, H., & Raineri, A. (1992). Irrationality, impulsiveness, and selfishness as discount reversal effects. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 93–118). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Rachlin, H., & Raineri, A. (1992). Irrationality, impulsiveness, and selfishness as discount reversal effects. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 93–118). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
go back to reference Rosati, A. G., Stevens, J. R., Hare, B., & Hauser, M. D. (2007). The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults. Current Biology, 17, 1663–1668.PubMedCrossRef Rosati, A. G., Stevens, J. R., Hare, B., & Hauser, M. D. (2007). The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults. Current Biology, 17, 1663–1668.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sozou, P. (1998). On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 2015–2020.CrossRef Sozou, P. (1998). On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 2015–2020.CrossRef
go back to reference Stevens, J., & Hauser, M. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 60–65.CrossRef Stevens, J., & Hauser, M. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 60–65.CrossRef
go back to reference Strotz, R. (1956). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–180.CrossRef Strotz, R. (1956). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time-perception. Medical Hypotheses, 65, 691–693.PubMedCrossRef Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time-perception. Medical Hypotheses, 65, 691–693.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Takahashi, T., Hadzibeganovic, T., Cannas, S., Makino, T., Fukui, H., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Cultural neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 30(2), 185–191.PubMed Takahashi, T., Hadzibeganovic, T., Cannas, S., Makino, T., Fukui, H., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Cultural neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 30(2), 185–191.PubMed
go back to reference Tan, C., & Johnson, R. (1996). To wait or not to wait: the influence of culture on discounting behavior. In W. Loke (Ed.), Perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 297–305). Maryland: Scarecrow Press. Tan, C., & Johnson, R. (1996). To wait or not to wait: the influence of culture on discounting behavior. In W. Loke (Ed.), Perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 297–305). Maryland: Scarecrow Press.
go back to reference Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. (2003). Religion: an overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 377–394.CrossRef Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. (2003). Religion: an overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 377–394.CrossRef
go back to reference Tsukayama, T., & Duckworth, A. L. (2010). Domain-specific temporal discounting and temptation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 72–82. Tsukayama, T., & Duckworth, A. L. (2010). Domain-specific temporal discounting and temptation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 72–82.
go back to reference Weber, M. (1958/2003). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. Weber, M. (1958/2003). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
go back to reference Zauberman, G., Kim, B., Malkoc, S., & Bettman, J. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 543–556.CrossRef Zauberman, G., Kim, B., Malkoc, S., & Bettman, J. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 543–556.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting
Auteurs
Fabio Paglieri
Anna M. Borghi
Lorenza S. Colzato
Bernhard Hommel
Claudia Scorolli
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0473-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2013

Psychological Research 6/2013 Naar de uitgave