Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2021

Health-related quality of life in women after colposcopy: results from a longitudinal patient survey

Auteurs: M. O’Connor, A. Ó. Céilleachair, K. O’Brien, J. O’Leary, C. Martin, T. D’Arcy, G. Flannelly, J. McRae, W. Prendiville, C. Ruttle, C. White, L. Pilkington, L. Sharp

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2021

Abstract

Background

Information concerning the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) consequences of colposcopy is limited, particularly over time. In a longitudinal study, we investigated women’s HRQoL at 4, 8 and 12 months post colposcopy and the factors associated with this.

Methods

Women attending colposcopy at two large hospitals affiliated with the national screening programme in Ireland were invited to complete questionnaires at 4, 8 and 12 months post colposcopy. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-3L and compared across a range of socio-demographic, clinical and attitudinal variables. A mixed-effects logistic multivariable model was employed to investigate associations between these variables and low HRQoL.

Results

Of 584 women initially recruited, 429, 343 and 303 completed questionnaires at 4, 8 and 12 months, respectively. The mean overall HRQoL score for the sample across all time points was 0.90 (SD 0.16). Approximately 18% of women experienced low HRQoL at each of the three time points. In multivariable testing, over the entire 12-month follow-up period, non-Irish nationals (OR 8.99, 95% CI 2.35–34.43) and women with high-grade referral cytology (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.08–7.13) were at higher odds of low HRQoL. Women who were past (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07–0.58) or never (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.16–1.12) smokers were at lower odds of low HRQoL than current smokers. As women’s satisfaction with their healthcare increased their odds of experiencing low HRQoL fell (OR per unit increase 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.75).

Conclusions

Women’s HRQoL did not change over the 12 months post colposcopy, but some subgroups of women were at higher risk of experiencing low HRQoL. These subgroups may benefit from additional support.

vorige artikel Diabetes and health-related quality of life among American Indians: the role of psychosocial factors

volgende artikel The association between nonrestorative sleep and health-related quality of life in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

IARC. (2005). IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention Volume 10 Cervix Cancer Screening. Retrieved August 25, 2020 from https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Handbooks-Of-Cancer-Prevention/Cervix-Cancer-Screening-2005

PHE Screening. (2019). Cervical screening programme England, 2018–19—report. Retrieved August 13, 2020 from https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/cervical-screening-annual/england---2018-19

Galaal, K., Bryant, A., Deane, K. H., Al-Khaduri, M., & Lopes, A. D. (2011). Interventions for reducing anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review Online, 12, CD006013.

O’Connor, M., O’Leary, E., Waller, J., Gallagher, P., D’arcy, T., Flannelly, G., et al. (2016). Trends in, and predictors of, anxiety and specific worries following colposcopy: A 12-month longitudinal study. Psycho-Oncology, 25(5), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3980. CrossRefPubMed

Sparić, R., Papoutsis, D., Kadija, S., Stefanović, R., Antonakou, A., Nejković, L., & Kesić, V. (2019). Psychosexual outcomes in women of reproductive age at more than two-years from excisional cervical treatment—A cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 40(2), 128–137. CrossRef

Hellsten, C., Sjöström, K., & Lindqvist, P. G. (2009). A longitudinal 2-year follow-up of quality of life in women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 147(2), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.09.002. CrossRefPubMed

O’Connor, M., O’Brien, K., Waller, J., Gallagher, P., D’Arcy, T., Flannelly, G., et al. (2017). Physical after-effects of colposcopy and related procedures, and their inter-relationship with psychological distress: A longitudinal survey. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 124(9), 1402–1410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14671. CrossRef

Swancutt, D. R., Greenfield, S. M., Luesley, D. M., & Wilson, S. (2011). Women’s experience of colposcopy: A qualitative investigation. BMC Women’s Health, 11, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-11. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002087. CrossRefPubMed

10.

Cullen, J., Schwartz, M. D., Lawrence, W. F., Selby, J. V., & Mandelblatt, J. S. (2004). Short-term impact of cancer prevention and screening activities on quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 22(5), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.05.191. CrossRef

11.

Heinonen, A., Tapper, A. M., Leminen, A., Sintonen, H., & Roine, R. P. (2013). Health-related quality of life and perception of anxiety in women with abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: An observational study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 169(2), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.033. CrossRefPubMed

12.

Korfage, I. J., Essink-Bot, M. L., Westenberg, S. M., Helmerhorst, T., Habbema, J. D., & van Ballegooijen, M. (2014). How distressing is referral to colposcopy in cervical cancer screening? A prospective quality of life study. Gynecologic Oncology, 132(1), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.001. CrossRefPubMed

13.

Whynes, D. K., Sharp, L., Cotton, S. C., Cruickshank, M., Gray, N. M., Little, J., & Waugh, N. (2013). Impact of alternative management policies on health-related quality of life in women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 169(1), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.02.006. CrossRefPubMed

14.

Bosch, F. X., Burchell, A. N., Schiffman, M., Giuliano, A. R., de Sanjose, S., Bruni, L., Tortolero-Luna, G., Kjaer, S. K., & Muñoz, N. (2008). Epidemiology and natural history of human papillomavirus infections and type-specific implications in cervical neoplasia. Vaccine, 26(Suppl 10), K1–K16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.05.064. CrossRefPubMed

15.

Nguyen-Huu, N. H., Thilly, N., Derrough, T., Sdona, E., Claudot, F., Pulcini, C., Agrinier, N., & HPV Policy working group. (2020). Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage, policies, and practical implementation across Europe. Vaccine, 38(6), 1315–1331. CrossRef

16.

Lew, J. B., Simms, K. T., Smith, M. A., Hall, M., Kang, Y. J., Xu, X. M., Caruana, M., Velentzis, L. S., Bessell, T., Saville, M., Hammond, I., & Canfell, K. (2017). Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: Effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program. The Lancet Public Health, 2(2), e96–e107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30007-5. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Barré, S., Massetti, M., Leleu, H., & De Bels, F. (2017). Organised screening for cervical cancer in France: A cost-effectiveness assessment. British Medical Journal Open, 7(10), e014626. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014626. CrossRef

18.

Termrungruanglert, W., Khemapech, N., Tantitamit, T., & Havanond, P. (2019). Cost effectiveness analysis of HPV primary screening and dual stain cytology triage compared with cervical cytology. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 30(2), e17. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e17. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Edwards, P. J., Roberts, I., Clarke, M. J., Diguiseppi, C., Wentz, R., Kwan, I., Cooper, R., Felix, L. M., & Pratap, S. (2009). Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, MR000008. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4. CrossRef

20.

EuroQol Research Foundation. (2018). Eq-5D-3L User Guide. EuroQol Research Foundation. Retrieved August 13, 2020 from https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/EQ-5D-3L-User-Guide_version-6.0.pdf

21.

Szende, A., Oppe, M., Devlin, N. J., & EuroQol Group. (2007). EQ-5D value sets: Inventory, comparative review, and user guide. . Springer. CrossRef

22.

McCaffery, K. J., Irwig, L., Turner, R., Chan, S. F., Macaskill, P., Lewicka, M., Clarke, J., Weisberg, E., & Barratt, A. (2010). Psychosocial outcomes of three triage methods for the management of borderline abnormal cervical smears: An open randomised trial. BMJ (Clinical Research edition), 340, b4491. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4491. CrossRef

23.

Brown, H., & Prescott, R. (2006). Applied mixed models in medicine, in statistics in practice. . Wiley. CrossRef

24.

von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, S. T. R. O. B. E. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet (London, England), 370(9596), 1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. CrossRef

25.

Feng, Y., Devlin, N., & Herdman, M. (2015). Assessing the health of the general population in England: How do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Pickard, A. S., Neary, M. P., & Cella, D. (2007). Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-70. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Heiskanen, J., Tolppanen, A. M., Roine, R. P., Hartikainen, J., Hippeläinen, M., Miettinen, H., & Martikainen, J. (2016). Comparison of EQ-5D and 15D instruments for assessing the health-related quality of life in cardiac surgery patients. Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes, 2(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw002. CrossRef

28.

Vartiainen, P., Mäntyselkä, P., Heiskanen, T., Hagelberg, N., Mustola, S., Forssell, H., Kautiainen, H., & Kalso, E. (2017). Validation of EQ-5D and 15D in the assessment of health-related quality of life in chronic pain. Pain, 158(8), 1577–1585. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000954. CrossRefPubMed

29.

Sintonen, H. (2001). The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: Properties and applications. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002086. CrossRefPubMed

30.

Payakachat, N., Ali, M. M., & Tilford, J. M. (2015). Can the EQ-5D detect meaningful change? A systematic review. PharmacoEconomics, 33(11), 1137–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0295-6. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

O’Connor, M., Waller, J., Gallagher, P., Martin, C. M., O’Leary, J. J., D’Arcy, T., Prendiville, W., Flannelly, G., Sharp, L., & Irish Screening Research Consortium (CERVIVA). (2015). Understanding women’s differing experiences of distress after colposcopy: A qualitative Interview Study. Women’s Health Issues, 25(5), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.05.009. CrossRefPubMed

32.

O’Connor, M., Gallagher, P., Waller, J., Martin, C. M., O’Leary, J. J., Sharp, L., & Irish Cervical Screening Research Consortium (CERVIVA). (2016). Adverse psychological outcomes following colposcopy and related procedures: A systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and gynaecology, 123(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13462. CrossRef

33.

Sharp, L., Cotton, S., Cruickshank, M., Gray, N., Smart, L., Whynes, D., Little, J., & TOMBOLA Group. (2016). Impact of post-colposcopy management on women’s long-term worries: Results from the UK population-based TOMBOLA trial. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 42(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101170. CrossRefPubMed

34.

Whynes, D. K., & TOMBOLA Group. (2009). Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to HADS-identified anxiety and depression. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15(5), 820–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01102.x. CrossRefPubMed

35.

Idehen, E. E., Koponen, P., Härkänen, T., Kangasniemi, M., Pietilä, A. M., & Korhonen, T. (2018). Disparities in cervical screening participation: A comparison of Russian, Somali and Kurdish immigrants with the general Finnish population. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0768-2. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Moser, K., Patnick, J., & Beral, V. (2009). Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: Analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ (Clinical Research Edition), 338, b2025. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2025. CrossRef

37.

Vahabi, M., Lofters, A. K., Kopp, A., & Glazier, R. H. (2021). Correlates of non-adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among screen-eligible women: A population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Causes & Control: CCC, 32(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-020-01369-y. CrossRefPubMed

38.

Central Statistics Office (2018) Census 2016—Non-Irish nationals in Ireland. Cork. Retrieved September 01, 2020 from https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-cpnin/cpnin/

39.

Bamm, E. L., Rosenbaum, P., & Wilkins, S. (2013). Is health related quality of life of people living with chronic conditions related to patient satisfaction with care? Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(9), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.707746. CrossRefPubMed

40.

Vogl, M., Wenig, C. M., Leidl, R., & Pokhrel, S. (2012). Smoking and health-related quality of life in English general population: Implications for economic evaluations. BMC Public Health, 12, 203. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-203. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Maheswaran, H., Petrou, S., Rees, K., & Stranges, S. (2013). Estimating EQ-5D utility values for major health behavioural risk factors in England. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 67(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201019. CrossRefPubMed

42.

Orji, C. C., Ghosh, S., Nwaobia, O. I., Ibrahim, K. R., Ibiloye, E. A., & Brown, C. M. (2021). Health behaviors and health-related quality of life among U.S. Adults Aged 18–64 Years. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.10.020. CrossRefPubMed

43.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta. Retrieved August 20, 2020 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK179276/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK179276.pdf

44.

Matsumoto, K., Oki, A., Furuta, R., Maeda, H., Yasugi, T., Takatsuka, N., Hirai, Y., Mitsuhashi, A., Fujii, T., Iwasaka, T., Yaegashi, N., Watanabe, Y., Nagai, Y., Kitagawa, T., Yoshikawa, H., & Japan HPV And Cervical Cancer (JHACC) Study Group. (2010). Tobacco smoking and regression of low-grade cervical abnormalities. Cancer Science, 101(9), 2065–2073. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01642.x. CrossRefPubMed

45.

Lamb, J., Dawson, S. I., Gagan, M. J., & Peddie, D. (2013). Cigarette smoking and the frequency of colposcopy visits treatments and re-referral. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand inc, 29(1), 24–33. PubMed

46.

Marcellusi, A., Capone, A., Favato, G., Mennini, F. S., Baio, G., Haeussler, K., Bononi, M., & HPV Italian Collaborative Study Group. (2015). Health utilities lost and risk factors associated with HPV-induced diseases in men and women: The HPV Italian collaborative study group. Clinical Therapeutics, 37(1), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.11.002. CrossRefPubMed

47.

Cotton, S. C., Sharp, L., Little, J., Duncan, I., Alexander, L., Cruickshank, M. E., Gray, N. M., Jenkins, D., Philips, Z., Robertson, A., & Seth, R., & TOMBOLA group (2006). Trial of management of borderline and other low-grade abnormal smears (TOMBOLA): Trial design. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 27(5), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.001. CrossRefPubMed

48.

Brooks, R. G. (2013). The EuroQol group after 25 years. . Springer. CrossRef

49.

Gray, N. M., Sharp, L., Cotton, S. C., Masson, L. F., Little, J., Walker, L. G., Avis, M., Philips, Z., Russell, I., Whynes, D., Cruickshank, M., & Woolley, C. M, & TOMBOLA group (2006). Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: Anxiety and associated factors. British Journal of Cancer, 94(9), 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603086. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Sharp, L., Cotton, S., Cruickshank, M., Gray, N. M., Harrild, K., Smart, L., Walker, L. G., & Little, J, & TOMBOLA group (2014). The unintended consequences of cervical screening: Distress in women undergoing cytologic surveillance. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 18(2), 142–150. CrossRef

51.

Pocnet, C., Antonietti, J. P., Strippoli, M. F., Glaus, J., Preisig, M., & Rossier, J. (2016). Individuals’ quality of life linked to major life events, perceived social support, and personality traits. Quality of Life Research, 25(11), 2897–2908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1296-4. CrossRefPubMed

52.

Staniute, M., Brozaitiene, J., & Bunevicius, R. (2013). Effects of social support and stressful life events on health-related quality of life in coronary artery disease patients. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 28(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e318233e69d. CrossRefPubMed

53.

Singer, E., & Ye, C. (2013). The use and effects of incentives in surveys. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645, 112–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/23479084. CrossRef

Titel: Health-related quality of life in women after colposcopy: results from a longitudinal patient survey
Auteurs: M. O’Connor
A. Ó. Céilleachair
K. O’Brien
J. O’Leary
C. Martin
T. D’Arcy
G. Flannelly
J. McRae
W. Prendiville
C. Ruttle
C. White
L. Pilkington
L. Sharp
Publicatiedatum: 01-04-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02831-3

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Health-related quality of life in women after colposcopy: results from a longitudinal patient survey

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2021

The impact of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis on health state utility values: evidence from Australia

Prospective analysis of disability and quality of life in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

The influence of frailty syndrome on quality of life in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes

The association between nonrestorative sleep and health-related quality of life in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

Exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

Correction to: Financial difficulties and patient‑reported outcomes among patients with advanced heart failure