Top

Gepubliceerd in:

19-11-2022

Health-related quality of life in various health conditions: two consecutive surveys of older Japanese adults

Auteurs: Takaaki Ikeda, Yoshimune Hiratsuka, Natsuyo Yanagi, Yasunori Komaki, Masayasu Murakami, Jun Aida, Katsunori Kondo, Ken Osaka

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2023

Abstract

Purpose

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in various health conditions in different countries is important given the regional differences. This study employed large-scale nationwide data targeting older adults in Japan to estimate the HRQOL in the key health conditions that are the major causes of disability.

Methods

Our data were derived from two survey waves (2016 and 2019 surveys) of cross-sectional data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, an ongoing nationwide study targeting functionally independent older adults in Japan. A total of 28,345 individuals from 27 of the 47 Japanese provinces were analyzed. The EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level instrument (EQ-5D-5L) was employed to assess the HRQOL utility scores. The targeted minimum loss-based estimator with sampling weighting methods was applied to estimate the utility score in eight major health conditions, including sensory organ disease, musculoskeletal disease, oral disorders, and depressive disorders.

Results

The estimated HRQOL utility score for those with the poorest health conditions in self-rated health, hearing loss, vision loss, number of remaining teeth (e.g., no teeth with no denture use), oral dysfunction, depressive symptoms, chronic low back pain, and chronic knee pain was 0.576 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.555–0.598), 0.768 (95% CI 0.737–0.800), 0.680 (95% CI 0.662–0.699), 0.809 (95% CI 0.796–0.821), 0.776 (95% CI 0.764–0.788), 0.723 (95% CI 0.710–0.737), 0.715 (95% CI 0.690–0.739), and 0.742 (95% CI 0.722–0.763), respectively.

Conclusion

We successfully provided a catalog for the HRQOL utility score in key health conditions that are the leading causes of disability among older adults.

vorige artikel An experience- and preference-based EQ-5D-3L value set derived using 18 months of longitudinal data in patients who sustained a fracture: results from the ICUROS

volgende artikel Correction: Health utilities in pediatric cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta‑analysis for clinical implementation

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. (2018). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 392(10159), 1789–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7CrossRef

GBD 2019 Ageing Collaborators. (2022). Global, regional, and national burden of diseases and injuries for adults 70 years and older: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study. BMJ, 376, e068208. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068208CrossRef

Lee, S. Y., Franchetti, M. K., Imanbayev, A., Gallo, J. J., Spira, A. P., & Lee, H. B. (2012). Non-pharmacological prevention of major depression among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review of the efficacy of psychotherapy interventions. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 55, 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.003CrossRefPubMed

Feltner, C., Wallace, I. F., Kistler, C. E., Coker-Schwimmer, M., & Jonas, D. E. (2021). Screening for hearing loss in older adults: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA, 325, 1202–1215. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.24855CrossRefPubMed

Brettschneider, C., Luck, T., Fleischer, S., Roling, G., Beutner, K., Luppa, M., Behrens, J., Riedel-Heller, S. G., & König, H. H. (2015). Cost-utility analysis of a preventive home visit program for older adults in Germany. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0817-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Davis, J. C., Marra, C. A., Robertson, M. C., Khan, K. M., Najafzadeh, M., Ashe, M. C., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2011). Economic evaluation of dose-response resistance training in older women: A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. Osteoporosis International, 22, 1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1356-5CrossRefPubMed

Bae, J.-M. (2015). Value-based medicine: Concepts and application. Epidemiology and Health, 37, e2015014. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2015014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Brown, G. C., Brown, M. M., & Sharma, S. (2003). Value-based medicine: Evidence-based medicine and beyond. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, 11, 157–170.CrossRefPubMed

Basch, E. (2010). The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(10), 865–869.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bulamu, N. B., Kaambwa, B., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015). A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8CrossRef

11.

Szende, A., Janssen, B., & Cabases, J. (2014). Self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7596-1CrossRef

12.

Kondo, K. (2016). Progress in aging epidemiology in Japan: The JAGES project. Journal of Epidemiology, 26(7), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20160093CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Devlin, N., Parkin, D., & Janssen, B. (2020). Methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D data. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47622-9CrossRef

14.

Ikeda, S., Shiroiwa, T., Igarashi, A., Noto, S., Fukuda, T., Saito, S., & Shimozuma, K. (2015). Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, 64(1), 47–55.

15.

Burke, W. J., Roccaforte, W. H., & Wengel, S. P. (1991). The short form of the geriatric depression scale: A comparison with the 30-item form. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 4, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/089198879100400310CrossRefPubMed

16.

Matsui, D., Yamamoto, T., Nishigaki, M., Miyatani, F., Watanabe, I., Koyama, T., Ozaki, E., Kuriyama, N., Kanamura, N., & Watanabe, Y. (2016). Validity of self-reported number of teeth and oral health variables. BMC Oral Health, 17, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0248-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Kiuchi, S., Kusama, T., Sugiyama, K., Yamamoto, T., Cooray, U., Yamamoto, T., Kondo, K., Osaka, K., & Aida, J. (2022). Longitudinal association between oral status and cognitive decline using fixed-effects analysis. Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20200476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Igarashi, A., Aida, J., Yamamoto, T., Hiratsuka, Y., Kondo, K., & Osaka, K. (2021). Associations between vision, hearing and tooth loss and social interactions: The JAGES cross-sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214545CrossRefPubMed

19.

Inoue, A., Hiratsuka, Y., Takesue, A., Aida, J., Kondo, K., & Murakami, A. (2022). Association between visual status and the frequency of laughter in older Japanese individuals : The JAGES cross- sectional study. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 7, e000908. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000908CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Zimdars, A., Nazroo, J., & Gjonça, E. (2012). The circumstances of older people in England with self-reported visual impairment: A secondary analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 30, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619611427374CrossRef

21.

Dionne, C. E., Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., Nachemson, A. L., Buchbinder, R., Walker, B. F., Wyatt, M., Cassidy, J. D., Rossignol, M., Leboeuf-Yde, C., & Hartvigsen, J. (2008). A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine, 33, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e7f94CrossRefPubMed

22.

Jones, K. R., Vojir, C. P., Hutt, E., & Fink, R. (2007). Determining mild, moderate, and severe pain equivalency across pain-intensity tools in nursing home residents. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 44(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2006.05.0051CrossRefPubMed

23.

Tsuchiya, A., Ikeda, S., Ikegami, N., Nishimura, S., Sakai, I., Fukuda, T., Hamashima, C., Hisashige, A., & Tamura, M. (2002). Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: The case of Japan. Health Economics, 11(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/HEC.673CrossRefPubMed

24.

Shiroiwa, T., Fukuda, T., Ikeda, S., Igarashi, A., Noto, S., Saito, S., & Shimozuma, K. (2016). Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D. Quality of Life Research, 25, 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1108-2CrossRefPubMed

25.

Shiroiwa, T., Noto, S., & Fukuda, T. (2021). Japanese population norms of EQ-5D-5L and health utilities index mark 3: Disutility catalog by disease and symptom in community settings. Value in Health, 24, 1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.010CrossRefPubMed

26.

Tabuchi, T., Gallus, S., Shinozaki, T., Nakaya, T., Kunugita, N., & Colwell, B. (2018). Heat-not-burn tobacco product use in Japan: Its prevalence, predictors and perceived symptoms from exposure to secondhand heat-not-burn tobacco aerosol. Tobacco Control, 27, E25–E33. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053947CrossRefPubMed

27.

Díaz, I., Williams, N., Hoffman, K. L., & Schenck, E. J. (2021). Nonparametric causal effects based on longitudinal modified treatment policies. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2021.1955691CrossRef

28.

Schuler, M. S., & Rose, S. (2017). Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for causal inference in observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 185(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww165CrossRefPubMed

29.

Polley, E., LeDell, E., & van der Laan, M. (2017). Package “SuperLearner.” Retrieved from https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2018-03-03/web/packages/SuperLearner/SuperLearner.pdf

30.

Schonlau, M., Van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., & Couper, M. (2009). Selection bias in web surveys and the use of propensity scores. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108327128CrossRef

31.

Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. (n.d.). Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions. Retrieved from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hss/cslc.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2022

32.

Henry, E. B., Barry, L. E., Hobbins, A. P., McClure, N. S., & O’Neill, C. (2020). Estimation of an instrument-defined minimally important difference in EQ-5D-5L index scores based on scoring algorithms derived using the EQ-VT version 2 valuation protocols. Value in Health, 23, 936–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.003CrossRefPubMed

33.

Miller, D. R., Rogers, W. H., Kazis, L. E., Spiro, A., Ren, X. S., & Haffer, S. C. (2008). Patients’ self-report of diseases in the medicare health outcomes survey based on comparisons with linked survey and medical data from the Veterans Health Administration. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 31(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAC.0000314707.88160.9cCrossRefPubMed

34.

Berkman, L. F., Kawachi, I., & Glymour, M. M. (2014). Social Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

35.

Davies, N. M., Dickson, M., Smith, G. D., Van Den Berg, G. J., & Windmeijer, F. (2018). The causal effects of education on health outcomes in the UK Biobank. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0279-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Silles, M. (2015). The causal effect of schooling on smoking behavior. Economics of Education Review, 48, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.06.004CrossRef

37.

Schisterman, E. F., Cole, S. R., & Platt, R. W. (2009). Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 20(4), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Van Hout, B., Janssen, M. F., Feng, Y. S., Kohlmann, T., Busschbach, J., Golicki, D., Lloyd, A., Scalone, L., Kind, P., & Pickard, A. S. (2012). Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value in Health, 15(5), 708–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Health-related quality of life in various health conditions: two consecutive surveys of older Japanese adults
Auteurs: Takaaki Ikeda
Yoshimune Hiratsuka
Natsuyo Yanagi
Yasunori Komaki
Masayasu Murakami
Jun Aida
Katsunori Kondo
Ken Osaka
Publicatiedatum: 19-11-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03295-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2023

Correction: Health utilities in pediatric cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta‑analysis for clinical implementation

Hypothetical versus experienced health state valuation: a qualitative study of adult general public views and preferences

Developing an Australian utility value set for MacNew-7D health states

The effects of greater frequency of two most prevalent bothersome acute respiratory symptoms on health-related quality of life in the 2020 US general population

Relationship between health-related quality of life and physical fitness in Norwegian adolescents

Different effects between the current capability of and changes in self-management strategies on improving health behavior and psychological health after 6 months: evidence from a prospective cohort study of patients with cancer