Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02161-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important concept to describe well-being of the general population and persons with diseases. The short form-36 (SF-36) is a widely used questionnaire assessing self-reported HRQOL in eight health domains. The aims of this study were to provide normative data for the SF-36 version 2 (SF-36v2) for all language regions in Switzerland and weighting coefficients to calculate two summary measures for physical and mental health.
A random representative (regarding age, sex, and language region) sample of people living in Switzerland aged 18–75 years in 2015 was eligible for our questionnaire survey. We calculated the eight health domain subscales for different subsamples based on sociodemographic characteristics. Two summary measures for physical and mental health were derived using data-based factor score coefficients and calculated for the subsamples.
A total of 1209 persons completed the SF-36v2 (mean age 48.7 years, 58.1% women). The SF-36v2 was valid and reliable in Switzerland. Physical health was better in men (p = 0.012) and younger persons (p < 0.001). Mental health was better in men (p < 0.001) and older persons (p < 0.001). Regarding regional differences, we found better physical (p = 0.002) and mental (p < 0.001) health in German speaking persons compared to French and Italian speaking persons.
This paper presents the first SF-36v2 normative data for Switzerland, which are based on a recent study in a representative sample. Our normative data and weighting coefficients will enable future studies to compare HRQOL assessed by the SF-36 in healthy and diseased persons to a representative Swiss sample.
Reeve, B. B., Mitchell, S. A., Dueck, A. C., Basch, E., Cella, D., Reilly, C. M., et al. (2014). Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju129. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Vives, A., Amable, M., Ferrer, M., Moncada, S., Llorens, C., Muntaner, C., et al. (2013). Employment precariousness and poor mental health: Evidence from Spain on a new social determinant of health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2013, 978656.
Laguardia, J., Campos, M. R., Travassos, C. M., Najar, A. L., Anjos, L. A., & Vasconcellos, M. M. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 (v.2) questionnaire in a probability sample of Brazilian households: Results of the survey Pesquisa Dimensoes Sociais das Desigualdades (PDSD), Brazil, 2008. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 61. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Laaksonen, M., Silventoinen, K., Martikainen, P., Rahkonen, O., Pitkaniemi, J., & Lahelma, E. (2007). The effects of childhood circumstances, adult socioeconomic status, and material circumstances on physical and mental functioning: A structural equation modelling approach. Annals of Epidemiology, 17(6), 431–439. CrossRefPubMed
Ware, J. E. Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483. CrossRef
Ware, J. E. Jr. (1993). SF-36 health survey manual & interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston, Massachusetts.
OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality (COPE) (2017). Understanding the socio-economic divide in Europe–Background report. 2017: Paris.
Federal Statistical Office, Sampling frame. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/population/surveys/census/natonal-census-integrated-system/sampling-frame.html. Accessed 19 December 2018
Maruish, M. E. (2011). User’s manual for the SF-36v2 health survey (3rd edn.). Lincoln: QualityMetric Incorporated.
Wagner, A. K., Gandek, B., Aaronson, N. K., Acquadro, C., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., et al. (1998). Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 925–932. CrossRefPubMed
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., Turner-Bowker, D. M., Gandek, B., & Maruish, M. E. (2008). SF-36v2® health survey: Administration guide for clinical traial investigators. Lincoln: QualityMetric Incorporated.
Morfeld, M., Kirchberger, I., Bullinger, M. (2011) SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand Deutsche Version des Short Form-36 Health Survey 2., ergänzte und überarbeitete Auflage Manual. Hogrefe Verlag: Göttingen.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2012). International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. Montreal.
StataCorp (2013). Stata survey data reference manual—Release 13. College Station, TX: Stata Press
Hawthorne, G., Osborne, R. H., Taylor, A., & Sansoni, J. (2007). The SF36 version 2: Critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms. Quality Life Research, 16(4), 661–673. CrossRef
Camenzind, P., & Wiedenmayer, G. (2016). Gesundheitsverhalten in der Schweiz—Sozioökonomische und kulturelle Unterschiede unter der Lupe (Obsan Bulletin 2/2016). Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium (Obsan): Neuchâtel.
Jeanneret, B., Goebel, V., (2012). Regionale Disparitäten in der Schweiz. Neuchâtel.
Ministry of Health. (2008). Methodology report for the 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey. Ministry of Health: Wellington.
Ministry of Health, A Portrait of Health. (2008). Key results of the 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey. Ministry of Health: Wellington.
- Health-related quality of life in Switzerland: normative data for the SF-36v2 questionnaire
Claudia E. Kuehni
- Springer International Publishing